Buddin, Richard (2011): Measuring teacher and school effectiveness at improving student achievement in Los Angeles elementary schools.
Download (2MB) | Preview
This study uses longitudinal student-level test score data to examine the effectiveness of elementary teachers and schools in Los Angeles. The results show that teacher effectiveness varies widely both across the Los Angeles school district and within district schools. Controlling for student background and preparation, we find only modest difference across schools in improving student achievement. We explore the sensitivity of teacher and school effectiveness measures to alternative regression controls. We find that teacher and school effectiveness measures are relatively insensitive to detailed controls for student and peer heterogeneity.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Measuring teacher and school effectiveness at improving student achievement in Los Angeles elementary schools|
|Keywords:||Student achievement; Teacher effectiveness; Value-added;|
|Subjects:||J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J08 - Labor Economics Policies
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J0 - General > J01 - Labor Economics: General
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education
|Depositing User:||Richard Buddin|
|Date Deposited:||01. Jul 2011 21:47|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 21:42|
Aaronson, D., Barrow, L., Sander, W., 2007. Teachers and Student Achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools, Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1), 95-135.
Angrist, J., Guryan, J., 2003. Does Teacher Testing Raise Teacher Quality? Evidence from State Certification Requirements, NBER working paper 9545.
Borjas, G., 1987. Self-selection and the earnings of immigrants, American Economic Review, 77(4), 531-553.
Boyd, D., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Wyckoff, J., 2005. The draw of home: how teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 (1), 113–132.
Buddin, R., McCaffrey, D., Kirby, S., Xia, N., 2007. Merit Pay for Florida Teachers: Design and Implementation Issues, Working paper, RAND WR-508-FEA.
Buddin, R., Zamarro, G., 2008. Teacher Quality, Teacher Licensure Tests, and Student Achievement, Working paper, RAND WR-555-IES. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR555/.
Buddin, R., Zamarro, G., 2009a. Teacher Qualifications and Student Achievement in Urban Elementary Schools, Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 103-115.
Buddin, R., Zamarro, G., 2009b. Teacher Qualifications and Middle School Student Achievement, RAND Corporation, WR-671-IES. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR671/.
Buddin, R., Zamarro, G., 2009c. Teacher Effectiveness in Urban High Schools, RAND Corporation, WR-693-IES, Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR693/.
Buddin, R. (2010). How Effective Are Los Angeles Teachers and Schools?, Los Angeles Times, unpublished working paper. Available at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27366/1/MPRA_paper_27366.pdf.
Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H., Vigdor, J., 2007. How and Why Do Teacher Credentials Matter for Student Achievement? NBER Working Paper 12828.
Dee, T., 2005. A teacher like me: does race, ethnicity, or gender matter? American Economic Review, 95(2), 558-565
Ehrenberg, R., Brewer, D., 1995. Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960’s? Coleman revisited, Economics of Education Review, 141, 1-21.
Ferguson, R. 1991. Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters, Harvard Journal on Legislation, 282, 465-498.
Ferguson, R., Ladd, H. 1996. How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama schools, In H.Ladd (Ed.), Holding schools accountable: Performance-based reform in education, 265-298. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
Goldhaber, D., 2007. Everyone’s Doing It, But What Does Teacher Testing Tell Us About Teacher Effectiveness? Journal of Human Resources, 42(4), 765-794.
Gordon, R., Kane, T., Staiger, D. (2006). Identifying Effective Teachers Using Performance on the Job, Brookings Institution Discussion Paper 2006-1.
Hanushek, E., 1986. The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools, Journal of Economic Literature, 24(4), 1141-1177.
Hanushek, E., 2008. Teacher Deselection. In Creating a New Teaching Profession, edited by Dan Goldhaber and Jane Hannaway, Urban Institute: Washington, D.C.
Harris, D., Sass, T., 2006. The Effects of Teacher Training on Teacher Value-Added, Working paper, Florida State University.
Hill, C., Bloom, H., Black, A., Lipsey, M. (2008). Empirical Benchmarks for Interpreting Effect Sizes in Research, Child Development Perspectives, Volume 2, Number 3, Pages 172–177.
Jacob, B., Lefgren, L., 2008. Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education, Journal of Labor Economics, 26(1), 101-136.
Jacobson, P., Suckow, M., 2006. Report on Passing Rates of Commission-Approved Exams For 2000-01 to 2004-05, California Commission on Teacher Credentialing.
Kane, T., Staiger, D. (2008). Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation. NBER Working Paper 14607.
Koedel, C., Betts, J., 2007. Re-Examining the Role of Teacher Quality in the Educational Production Function, Working paper, University of California, San Diego.
Le, V., Buddin, R., 2005., Examining the Validity Evidence for California Teacher Licensure Exams, Working paper, RAND WR-334-EDU.
McCaffrey, D., Sass, T., Lockwood, J., and Mihaly, K. (2009). The Inter-Temporal Variability of Teacher Effects Estimates, Education Finance and Policy, Fall 2009, Vol. 4, No. 4: 572–606.
Mehrens, W.A., Klein, S.P., & Gabrys, R, E. (2002). Report on the Technical Advisory Committee on the Massachusetts Tests for Educator Licensure. Paper by the Massachusetts State Department of Education and Commissioner of Education.
MET Project (2010). Learning about Teaching: Initial Findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Murnane, R. & Steele, J., 2008. What Is the Problem? The Challenge of Providing Effective Teachers for All Children, Project Muse, 17(1), 15-43.
National Council on Teacher Quality, 2004. Increasing the Odds: How Good Policies can Yield Better Teachers.
Newton, S., 2004. Stull Evaluations and Student Performance, Los Angeles Unified School District, Planning, Assessment and Research Division Publication No. 186
Ouazad, A., 2007. Assessed by a teacher like me: Race, gender and subjective evaluations, Working paper, London School of Economics.
Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., Kain, J., 2005. Teachers, schools, and academic achievement, Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher Quality in Educational Production: Tracking, Decay, and Student Achievement, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1): 175–214.
Rowan, B., Chaing, F., Miller, R.J., 1997. Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on students’ achievement, Sociology of Education, 704, 256-284.
Rowan, B., Correnti R., Miller, R. J. 2002. What large-scale research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools, Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525-1567.
Strauss, R., Sawyer, E., 1986. Some New Evidence on Teacher and Student Competencies, Economics of Education Review, 5(1), 41-48.
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn: The New Teacher Project. Available online at http://widgeteffect.org/