Remoundou, Kyriaki and Drichoutis, Andreas and Koundouri, Phoebe (2010): Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?
This is the latest version of this item.
Download (115kB) | Preview
Running conventional laboratory experiments (i.e., with a standard student subject pool) is common practice in economic experiments, especially when methodological enquiries are explored. However, the generalization of the results from such experiments to the entire population is a highly controversial issue in the literature. In this study we investigate and measure warm glow motivations behind giving in charitable auctions in a conventional lab experiment and an artefactual field experiment (i.e., lab experiment using subjects from the general population). Using a novel experimental design that allows isolation of warm glow from contributions motivated by pure altruism, we find that warm glow is only evident in the student population. Our findings cast doubt on the validity of generalizing the conclusions from conventional lab experiments to the general population.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results?|
|Keywords:||warm glow; charitable auctions; lab experiment; WEIRDos|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
|Depositing User:||Andreas Drichoutis|
|Date Deposited:||28 Jul 2011 07:20|
|Last Modified:||23 May 2016 11:09|
Anderson, J., S.V. Burks, J. Carpenter, L. Goette, K. Maurer, D. Nosenzo, R. Potter, K. Rocha and A. Rustichini. 2010. ''Self Selection Does Not Increase Other-Regarding Preferences among Adult Laboratory Subjects, but Student Subjects May Be More Self-Regarding than Adults'' In: IZA Discussion Paper Series, No 5389.
Andreoni, J. 1989. ''Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence'', Journal of Political Economy 97:1447-1458.
Andreoni, J. 2006. ''Philanthropy'' In: S.-C. Kolm, J.M. Ythier (Eds.) Handbook of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Belot, M., R. Duch and L. Miller. 2010. ''Who Should be Called to the Lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games'' In: Nuffield centre for experimental social sciences, University of Oxford, Discussion paper series.
Burks, S., J. Carpenter and L. Goette. 2009. ''Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment'' Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70: 458-469.
Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2001. ''Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments? Application to the valuation of the environment.'' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41:179-192.
Carpenter, J., S. Burks and E. Verhoogen. 2004. ''Comparing Students to Workers: The Effects of Social Framing on Behavior in Distribution Games.'' In: IZA Discussion Papers No 1341.
Carpenter, J., C. Connolly and C.K. Myers. 2008. ''Altruistic behavior in a representativedictator experiment.'' Experimental Economics 11:282-298.
Carpenter, J., and E. Seki. 2011. ''Do Social Preferences Increase Productivity? Field Experimental Evidence from Fishermen in Toyama Bay.'' Economic Inquiry 49(2):612-630.
Cleave, B.L., N. Nikiforakis and R. Slonim, 2010. ''Is There Selection Bias in Laboratory Experiments?'' In: University of Melbourne Department of Economics Working Papers Series Number 1106.
Corrigan, J.R. and M.C. Rousu. 2006. ''The effect of initial endowments in experimental auctions'' American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88:448-457.
Crumpler, H. and P.J. Grossman. 2008. ''An experimental test of warm glow giving.'' Journal of Public Economics 92:1011-1021.
Cunningham, W.H., W.T. Anderson and J.H. Murphy. 1974. ''Are students real people?'' Journal of Business 47:399-409.
Depositario, D.P.T, R.M. Nayga, X.M. Wu and T.R. Laude. 2009. ''Should students be used as subjects in experimental auctions?'' Economics Letters, 102:122-124.
Drichoutis, A.C, and R.M. Nayga. 2011. Marginal changes in random parameters ordered response models with interaction terms, Econometric Reviews 30 (5): 565-576.
Eckel, C.C and P.J. Grossman. 2000. ''Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments.'' Experimental Economics 3:107-120.
Elfenbein, D.W., and B. McManus. 2007. ''A Greater Price for a Greater Good? The Charity Premium in Online Auctions'' In: Washington University in St. Louis School of Business.
Enis, B.M., K.K. Cox and J.E. Stafford. 1972. ''Students as Subjects in Consumer Behavior Experiments.'' Journal of Marketing Research 9:72-74.
Feltovich, N. 2011. ''What's To Know About Laboratory Experimentation In Economics?'' Journal of Economic Surveys 25: 371-379.
Falk, A., E. Fehr, and C. Zehnder. 2011. ''Did We Overestimate the Role of Social Preferences? The Case of Self-Selected Student Samples.'' IZA Discussion Paper No. 5475.
Fischbacher, U. 2007. ''z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments'' Experimental Economics 10:171-178.
Gachter, S., B. Herrmann and C. Thoni. 2004. ''Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence.'' Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55:505-531.
Haigh, M.S., and J.A. List. 2005. ''Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis.'' The Journal of Finance 60:523-534.
Harbaugh, W.T., U. Mayr and D.R. Burghart. 2007. ''Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations'' Science 316:1622-1625.
Harrison, G.W., and J. List. 2004. ''Field Experiments.'' Journal of Economic Literature 48:1009-1055.
Healy, A. 2009. ''How effectively do people learn from a variety of different opinions?'' Experimental Economics 12:386-416.
Henrich, J., S.J. Heine and A. Norenzayan. 2010. ''The weirdest people in the world?'' Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33:61-135.
Isaac, R.M., S. Pevnitskaya and T.C. Salmon. 2010. ''Do preferences for charitable giving help auctioneers?'' Experimental Economics 13:14-44.
Isoni, A., G. Loomes and R. Sugden. 2011. ''The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect", Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations: A Reassessment'' American Economic Review, (Forthcoming).
Levitt, S.D., and J.A. List. 2007.'' What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?'', Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 153-174.
J.L. Lusk, J.L., M. Jamal, L. Kurlander, M. Roucan and L. Taulman. 2005. ''A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies.'' Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 30: 28-44.
Lusk, J.L., and J.F. Shogren. 2007. Experimental Auctions: Methods and Applications in Economic and Marketing Research, Cambridge University Press, UK.
McNemar, Q. 1946. ''Opinion-Attitude Methodology'' Psychological Bulletin 43:289-374.
Nunes, P.A.L.D., and E. Schokkaert. 2003. ''Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation.'' Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45:231-245.
Plott, C.R., and K. Zeiler. 2005. ''The willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap, the endowment effect," subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations'' American Economic Review 95:530-545.
Sears, D.O. 1986. ''College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of Human Nature'' Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51:515-530.
Spencer, M.A., S.K. Swallow and C.J. Miller. 1988. ''Valuing Water Quality Monitoring: A Contingent Valuation Experiment Involving Hypothetical And Real Payments'' Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 27: 28-42.
Tonin, M., and M. Vlassopoulos. 2011. ''An Experimental Investigation of Intrinsic Motivations for Giving'' IZA Discussion Paper No. 5461.
Umberger, W.J., and D.M. Feuz. 2004. ''The Usefulness of Experimental Auctions in Determining Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay for Quality-Differentiated Products'' Review of Agricultural Economics 26:170-185.
Available Versions of this Item
Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results? (deposited 04 Oct 2010 21:05)
- Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results? (deposited 28 Jul 2011 07:20) [Currently Displayed]