Globalization and its Effects on Regional Variations in Factor Substitution and Returns to Scale in the Indian Factory Sector

Mishra, SK (2007): Globalization and its Effects on Regional Variations in Factor Substitution and Returns to Scale in the Indian Factory Sector.

Abstract

The issue of inequality or imbalance in sectional, sectoral or regional distribution of economic and social variables is connected to welfare implications of the functioning of an economy responsible for allocation of resources, and production, distribution and consumption of the material requisites of well-being. Economic development and technological progress may or may not deliver justice in the Rawls’ sense although such development and progress might be perfectly just in Mill’s or Nietzsche’s sense.

Inequalities and their dynamics are often studied in terms of collectives of gross variables – income, amenities and facilities, infrastructure, etc. – that directly impinge on the welfare of the people. However, deeper parameters are seldom studied in this regard. Nevertheless, these parameters - such as propensities to consume and save, rate and direction of substitution of factors of production, returns to scale, bias of technical progress, concentration of monopoly power, etc are altered in the process of development and determine the gross economic variables for a fairly long period.

In this study we make an attempt to look into the spatial/regional distribution of a few structural parameters in the factory sector of India and purport to examine if, in the wake of globalization, there have been substantial changes in their distribution. Our main apparatus of analysis is ‘production functions’ that permit variable elasticities of factor substitution and returns to scale. We use data at the state level for 1990-91 and 2003-04 for our analysis.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong (India)
• Language: English
• Keywords: Globalization; liberalization; industrialization; manufacturing sector; regional distribution; inequality; production function; variable returns to scale; substitution; factors of productions; India; state-level data
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies; L - Industrial Organization > L0 - General > L00 - General

References

· Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.S. and Solow, R.M. (1961) “Capital Labour Substitution and Economic Efficiency”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, pp. 225-250. · Bruno, M. (1968) “Estimation of Factor Contribution to Growth under Structural Disequilibrium”, International Economic Review, 9, pp. 49-62. · Dutt, A.K. and Rao, J.M. (2000) “Globalization and its Social Discontents: The Case of India”, Working Paper No. 16, CEPA Working Paper Series I: Globalization, Labor Markets, and Social Policy. Center for Economic Policy Analysis, New School University, New York. · Felipe, J. and Fisher, F.M. (2001) "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists Should Know", Metroeconomica, 54, pp. 208-262. Reprint available at Social Science Research Network (SSRN) http://ssrn.com/abstract=422067. · Felipe, J. and Adams, F.G. (2005) "'A Theory of Production': The Estimation of the Cobb-Douglas Function: A Retrospective View", Eastern Economic Journal, 31(5), pp. 427-445. · Felipe, J. and McCombie, J.S.L. (2005) "How Sound Are The Foundations of the Aggregate Production Function?", Eastern Economic Journal, 31(5), pp. 467-488. · Fisher, F.M. (2005) "Aggregate Production Functions - A Pervasive, But Unpersuasive, Fairytale", Eastern Economic Journal, 31(5), pp. 489-491. · Hensman, R. (2001) “The Impact of Globalisation on Employment in India and Responses from the Formal and Informal Sectors” IIAS/IISG, CLARA Working Paper, No. 15, Amsterdam, 2001. · Humphrey, T.M. (1997). “Algebraic Production Functions and their Uses before Cobb-Douglas”, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 83(1), pp. 51-83. Available at http://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedreq/y1997iwinp51-83.html · Kadiyala, K.R. (1972) “Production Functions and Elasticity of Substitution” Southern Economic Journal, 38(3), pp. 281-284. · Kundu, A (1997). “Trends and Structure of Employment in the 1990s. Implications for Urban Growth”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 14, 1399-1405. · Lall, S., Shalizi, Z. and Deichmann, U.(2001) “Agglomeration Economies and Productivity in Indian Industry”, Social Science Research Network, http://ssrn.com/abstract=632732. · Mishra, SK. (2006-a) "Global Optimization by Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Methods: Evaluation on Some Benchmark Functions", Social Science Research Network, http://ssrn.com/abstract=933827. · Mishra, S. K. (2006-b) "Globalization and Structural Changes in the Indian Industrial Sector: An Analysis of Production Functions" SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=952675 · Mishra, S.K. (2007) "Estimation of Zellner-Revankar Production Function Revisited." Economics Bulletin, Vol. 3, No. 14, pp. 1-7 · Mishra, S.K. and Nayak, P. (2007) "Socioeconomic Dimensions of Globalization in India," The Icfai Journal of Managerial Economics, Icfai Press, vol. v(1), pp 63-80. · Nietzsche, F. (1879): Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, Republished (1995) Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy, Cambridge Univ. Press, London. · Pressman, S. (2005) "What is Wrong with the Aggregate Production Function?", Eastern Economic Journal, 31(5), pp. 422-425. · Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. Mass. · Revankar, N.S. (1971) “A Class of Variable Elasticity of Substitution Production Functions”, Econometrica, 39(1), pp. 61-71. · Robinson, J. (1953) “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital”, The Review of Economic Studies, 21, pp. 81-106. · Samuelson, P.A. (1962) “Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Production Function”, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), pp. 193-206. · Saptari, R. (2001) “The Impact of Globalization on Employment in India and Responses from the Formal and Informal Sectors”, Seminar of CLARA fellow: Rohini Hensman, Bombay. · Sato, R. (1970) “The Estimation of Biased Technical Progress and the Production Function”, International Economic Review, 11, pp. 179-208. · Sato, R. (1975) “The Most General Class of CES Functions”, Econometrica, 43 (5-6), pp. 999-1003. · Shaikh, A. (1974) "Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra: The Humbug Production Function", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56(1), pp. 115-120. Reprint available at the website http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/humbug.pdf · Shaikh, A. (1980) "Laws of Production and Laws of Algebra—Humbug II", in Growth, Profits and Property (ed.) Nell. E.J., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. Reprint available at the website http://homepage.newschool.edu/~AShaikh/humbug2.pdf. · Shaikh, A. (2005) "Nonlinear Dynamics and Pseudo-Production Functions", Eastern Economic Journal, 31(5), pp. 447-466. · Storn, R. and Price, K. (1995) "Differential Evolution - A Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces": Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkley. · Zellner, A. and Revankar, N.S.(1969) “Generalized Production Functions”, The Review of Economic Studies, 36(2), pp. 241-250.