Muhammad, Shahbaz and Tiwari, Aviral and Muhammad, Nasir (2011): The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on environment performance in South Africa.
Download (173kB) | Preview
This paper explores the effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on environmental performance using annual data over the period of 1965-2008 for South African economy. ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration has used to test the long run relationship among the variables while short run dynamics have been investigated by applying error correction method (ECM). Unit root problem is checked through Saikkonen and Lutkepohl  structural break unit root test.
Our findings confirmed long run relationship among the variables. Results showed that a rise in economic growth increases energy emissions while financial development lowers it. Coal consumption has significant contribution to deteriorate environment significantly. Trade openness improves environmental quality by lowering the growth of energy pollutants. EKC is also existed.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on environment performance in South Africa|
|English Title:||The Effects of Financial Development, Economic Growth, Coal Consumption and Trade Openness on Environment Performance in South Africa|
|Keywords:||Coal Consumption, Economic Growth, Environment|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F18 - Trade and Environment
P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P28 - Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment
|Depositing User:||Muhammad Shahbaz|
|Date Deposited:||10. Aug 2011 04:18|
|Last Modified:||04. Jan 2016 01:55|
 O. Saikkonen, H. Lutkepohl, Testing for a unit root in a time series with a level shift at unknown time, Econometric Theory. 18 (2002) 313-348.
 G. Grossman, A. Krueger, Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement, National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 3194, NBER, Cambridge. (1991)
 World Bank, (2007).
 BP Statistical Review of World Energy, Recession drove 2009 energy demand lower, (2010). www.energysights.net
 V. Shukla, K. Parikh, The environmental consequences of urban growth: cross-national perspectives on economic development, air pollution, and city size, Urban Geography. 12 (1992) 422– 449.
 N. Shafik, Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis, Oxford Economic Papers. 46 (1994) 757– 773.
 T. Selden, D. Song, Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 29 (1995) 162–168.
 W. Jaeger, S. Patel, T. Pinckney, Smallholder wood production and population pressure in East Africa: evidence of an Environmental Kuznets Curve?, Land Economics. 71 (1995) 1 –21.
 M. Tucker, Carbon dioxide emissions and global GDP, Ecological Economics. 15 (1995) 215-223.
 S.K. Jha, The Kuznets Curve: a reassessment, World Development. 24 (1996) 773–780.
 R.J. Horvath, Energy consumption and the Environmental Kuznets Curve debate. Department of Geography, University of Sydney, Australia, Mimeo. (1997)
 E. Barbier, Introduction to the Environmental Kuznets curve special issue, Environment and Development Economics. 2 (1997) 369–381.
 L. Matyas, L. Konya, L. Macquaries, The Kuznets U-Curve hypothesis: some panel data evidence, Applied Economics Letters. 5 (1998) 693– 697.
 A. Ansuategi, E. Barbier, C. Perrings, The Environmental Kuznets Curve, in: J.C.J.M. van den Bergh, M.W. Hofkes (Eds.), Theory and Implementation of Sustainable Development Modelling, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht., 1998
 M.T. Heil, T.M. Selden, Panel stationarity with structural breaks: carbon emissions and GDP, Applied Economic Letters. 6 (1999) 223–225.
 J.A. List, C.A. Gallet, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: does one size fit all?, Ecological Economics. 31 (1999) 409– 423.
 D.F. Brandoford, R. Schlieckert, S.H. Shore, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: exploring a fresh specification, NBER Working paper 8001. (2000)
 D.I. Stern, M.S. Common, Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulphur?, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 41 (2001) 162–178.
 J. Roca, Do individual preferences explain Environmental Kuznets Curve?, Ecological Economics. 45 (2003) 3– 10.
 B. Friedl, M. Getzner, Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy, Ecological Economics. 45 (2003) 133–148.
 S. Dinda, D. Coondoo, Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics. 57 (2006) 167–181.
 S. Managi, P.R. Jena, Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India, Ecological Economics. 65 (2008) 432–440.
 D. Coondoo, S. Dinda, The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns, Ecological Economics. 65 (2008) 375–385.
 E. Akbostanci, S. Turut-Asik, G.I. Tunc, The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?, Energy Policy. 37 (2009) 861–867.
 G. Grossman, A. Krueger, Economic environment and the economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110 (1995) 353–377.
 A. Tamazian, J.P. Chousaa, K.C. Vadlamannatia, Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries, Energy policy. 37 (2009) 246-253.
 F. Halicioglu, An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey, Energy Policy. 37 (2009) 1156–1164.
 A. Tamazian, B.B. Rao, Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? evidence from transitional economies, Energy Economics. 32 (2010) 137-145.
 A. Jalil, M. Feridun, The impact of growth, energy and financial development on the environment in China: a cointegration analysis, Energy Economics. 33 (2011) 284-291.
 J. Frankel, D. Romer, Does trade cause growth? The American Economic Review. 89 (1999) 379–399.
 R. King, R. Levine, Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right, Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108 (1993) 717–737.
 S. Tadesse, Financial development and technology, William Davidson Institute Working Paper no. 749. (2005).
 G. Kumbaroglu, N. Karali, Y. Arıkan, CO2, GDP and RET: an aggregate economic equilibrium analysis for Turkey, Energy Policy. 36 (2008) 2694-2708.
 S. Claessens, E. Feijen, Financial sector development and the millennium development goals, World Bank Working Paper No. 89. ( 2007)
 S. Dasgupta, A. Mody, S. Roy, D. Wheeler, environmental regulation and development: a cross-country empirical analysis, Oxford Development Studies. 29 (2001) 173-187.
 P. Lanoie, B. Laplante, M. Roy, Can capital markets create incentives for pollution control?, Ecological Economics. 26 (1998) 31–41.
 S. Dasgupta, J.H. Hong, B. Laplante, N. Mamingi, Disclosure of environmental violations and stock market in the Republic of Korea, Ecological Economics. 58 (2004) 759-777.
 W. Antweiler, B.R. Copeland, M.S. Taylor, Is free trade good for the environment?, American Economic Review. 91 (2001) 877–908.
 R.E.B. Lucas, D. Wheeler, H. Hettige, Economic development, environmental regulation and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution: 1960 – 1988, in: P. Low (Eds.), International Trade and the Environment, World Bank discussion paper, 159, 1992, 67– 87.
 N. Shafik, S. Bandyopadhyay, Economic growth and environmental quality: time series and cross-country evidence, Background Paper for the World Development Report, The World Bank, Washington, DC. (1992)
 N. Birdsall, D. Wheeler, Trade policy and industrial pollution in Latin America: where are the pollution havens?, Journal of Environment and Development. 2 (1993) 137–149.
 M.J. Ferrantino, International trade, environmental quality and public policy, The World Economy. 20 (1997) 43-72.
 J. M. Grether, A. Nicole, J.D. Melo, Is trade bad for the environment? Decomposing world-wide SO2 emissions 1990-2000, Discussion Paper, University of Geneva. (2007)
 V. Suri, D. Chapman, Economic growth, trade and the environment: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve, Ecological Economics. 25 (1998) 195– 208.
 D.G. Abler, A. G. Rodriguez, J. S. Shortle, Trade liberalization and the environment in Costa Rica, Environment and Development Economics. 4 (1999) 357-73.
 R. Lopez, The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade liberalization, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 27 (1994) 163–184.
 M.A. Cole, R.J.R. Elliott, A.K. Azhar, The determinants of trade in pollution intensive industries: North– South evidence, University of Birmingham, UK, Mimeo. (2000)
 S. Dhakal, Urban energy use and carbon emissions from cities in China and policy implications, Energy Policy. 37 (2009) 4208-4219.
 S. S. Sharma, Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries, Applied Energy. 88 (2011) 376–382.
 I. Martínez-Zarzoso, A. Maruotti, The impact of urbanization on CO2 emissions: evidence from developing countries, Ecological Economics. 70 (2011) 1344-1353.
 K. Menyah, Y. Wolde-Rufael, Energy consumption, pollutant emissions and economic growth in South Africa, Energy Economics. 32 (2010) 1374–1382.
 M. Shahbaz, H.H. Lean, M.S. Shabbir, Environmental Kuznets Curve and the role of energy consumption in Pakistan, Discussion Paper DEVDP 10/05, Development Research Unit, Monash University, Australia. (2010).
 S. Cameron, A review of the econometric evidence on the effects of capital punishment, Journal of Socio-economics. 23 (1994) 197-214.
 I. Ehrlich, The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment Reply, American Economics Review. 67 (1977) 452–58.
 I. Ehrlich, The deterrent effect of capital punishment-a question of life and death, American Economic Review. 65 (1975) 397-417.
 A. Bello, A.M. Abimbola, Does level of economic growth influence environmental quality in Nigeria: A test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis, Pakistan Journal of Social Science. 7 (2010) 325-327.
 M. Lanne, H. Lütkepohl, P. Saikkonen, Comparison of unit root tests for time series with level shifts, Journal of Time Series Analysis. 27 (2002) 663-685.
 M.H. Pesaran, Y. Shin, R.J. Smith, Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal Applied Econometrics. 16 (2001) 289–326
 M. Shrestha, A, Chowdhury, ARDL modeling approach to testing the financial liberalization hypothesis, University of Wollongong Economics Working Paper Series 2005, http://www.uow.edu.au/commerce/econ/wpapers.html (2005).
 S. Ng, P. Perron, LAG length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power, Econometrica. 69 (2001) 1519-1554.
 H. Luetkepohl, Structural Vector Autoregressive Analysis for Cointegrated Variables, Economics Working Papers ECO2005/02, European University Institute. (2005).
 P.K. Narayan, The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from co-integration tests, Applied Economics. 37 (2005) 1979-1990.
 H. Winkler, Energy policies for sustainable development in South Africa, Energy for Sustainable Development. 11 (2007) 26-34.
 M. Fodha, O. Zaghdoud, Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve, Energy Policy. 38 (2010) 1150-1156.
 M. Nasir, F. Rehman, Environmental Kuznets Curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation, Energy Policy. 39 (2011) 1857-1864.
 D. Maddison, K. Rehdanz, Carbon emissions and economic growth: homogeneous causality in heterogeneous panels, Kiel Working Papers, No: 1437, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. (2008)
 X. P. Zhang, X-M. Cheng, Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in China, Ecological Economics. 68 (2009) 2706-2712.
 A. Jalil, S.F. Mahmud, Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China, Energy Policy. 37 (2009) 5167-5172.
 S. Ghosh, Examining carbon emissions-economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach, Energy Policy. 38 (2010) 2613-3130.
 J.G. Blanford, R&D investment strategy for climate change, Energy Economics. (forthcoming) (2008).