Potgieter, Petrus H. and Rosinger, Elemér E. (2007): Is Economics Entering its PostWitchcraft Era?
There is a more recent version of this item available. 

PDF
MPRA_paper_3340.pdf Download (176kB)  Preview 
Abstract
Recently, an awareness is emerging in economics about the fact that important problems are not solvable algorithmically, that is, by any finite number of steps. This statement can be made mathematically exact and this paper reviews the contributions that have been made in this regard, related to standard topics in economics.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Institution:  University of South Africa 
Original Title:  Is Economics Entering its PostWitchcraft Era? 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Computability economics; general equilibrium theory; Arrow's impossibility theorem; Debreu's theorem; Malleus Maleficiarum 
Subjects:  A  General Economics and Teaching > A1  General Economics > A11  Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists A  General Economics and Teaching > A1  General Economics > A12  Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0  General > C02  Mathematical Methods 
Item ID:  3340 
Depositing User:  Petrus H Potgieter 
Date Deposited:  28. May 2007 
Last Modified:  19. Feb 2013 04:39 
References:  1 Baigger, Günter. 1985. Die Nichtkonstruktivität des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. Arch. Math. Logik Grundlag., 25(34):183188. 2 BBC NEWS (AsiaPacific): Vanuatu cargo cult marks 50 years. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asiapacific/6363843.stm (accessed March 31, 2007). 3 Brattka, Vasco. 2001. Recursion and Computability over Topological Structures. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 40:5. 4 Bridges, Douglas S., and Fred Richman. 1991. A recursive counterexample to Debreu's theorem on the existence of a utility function. Mathematical Social Sciences 21, no. 2 (April): 179182. 5 Canning, David. 1992. Rationality, Computability, and Nash Equilibrium. Econometrica 60, no. 4 (July): 877888. 6 Debreu, Gerard. 1970. Economies with a Finite Set of Equilibria. Econometrica 38, no. 3 (May): 387392. 7 Fishburn, Peter C. 1970. Arrow's impossibility theorem: Concise proof and infinite voters. Journal of Economic Theory 2, no. 1 (March): 103106. 8 Gneezy, U., and A. Rustichini. 2000. A Fine is a Price. The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (1): 118. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/gneezy98fine.html (accessed March 29, 2007) 9 Government of South Africa. 2006. Report on Incentive Structures of Social Assistance Grants in South Africa. Pretoria: Department of Social Development. http://www.welfare.gov.za/documents/2006/gps.pdf (accessed March 31, 2007). 10 Feynman, Richard. 1974. Cargo Cult Science. http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/02/CargoCult.htm (accessed March 31, 2007). 11 Hayek, F. A. 1945. The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review 35, no. 4 (September): 519530. 12 Jeffry L. Hirst. Notes on Reverse Mathematics and Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem. available online: http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~jlh/snp/pdfslides/bfp.pdf. 13 Mihara, H. Reiju. 1999. Arrow's theorem, countably many agents, and more visible invisible dictators. Journal of Mathematical Economics 32, no. 3 (November): 267287. 14 Orevkov, V.P. A constructive map of the square into itself, which moves every constructive point. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 152:5558, 1963. 15 Rassenti, Stephen, Stanley S. Reynolds, Vernon L. Smith, and Ferenc Szidarovszky. 2000. Adaptation and convergence of behavior in repeated experimental Cournot games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 41, no. 2 (February): 117146. 16 Wong, KamChau and Richter, Marcel K. 1996. Bounded rationalities and computable economies. Discussion paper 297, Minnesota  Center for Economic Research, December 1996. Available online: http://ideas.repec.org/p/fth/minner/297.html [accessed 20041230]. 17 Wong, KamChau and Richter, Marcel K. 1999. Noncomputability of competitive equilibrium. Economic Theory, 14(1):127. 18 Wong, KamChau and Richter, Marcel K. 1999. Computable preference and utility. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 32(3):339354. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/3340 
Available Versions of this Item
 Is Economics Entering its PostWitchcraft Era? (deposited 28. May 2007) [Currently Displayed]