Tittenbrun, Jacek S. (2011): Economic Sociology or Economic Imperialism? The Case of Gary C. Becker.
Download (210kB) | Preview
The paper is devoted to a critical analysis of a number of key theories by Gary S. Becker. It is commonly believed that his main accomplishment lies in the extension of the scope of an economic analysis to include numerous traditionally considered as non-economic phenomena. This extension, however, is only feasible at the expense of another extension – this time of the scope of the concepts used. This over-inclusiveness , in turn, makes his theories impossible to falsify, thus calling into question their scientific quality. In the process of considering particular Becker’s conceptions, i.e. human and social capital, the family, marriage and household and the polity a host of other specific drawbacks of Becker’s economic approach to social processes, often related to his ideological bias are indicated.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Economic Sociology or Economic Imperialism? The Case of Gary C. Becker|
|English Title:||Economic Sociology or Economic Imperialism? The Case of Gary C. Becker|
|Keywords:||Becker, human capital, social capital, marriage, altruism, self-interest family|
|Subjects:||A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines|
|Depositing User:||j.s. tittenbrun|
|Date Deposited:||26. Sep 2011 13:56|
|Last Modified:||21. Oct 2015 11:13|
Antonovics, Kate and Robert Town; (2004), "Are All the Good Men Married? Uncovering the Sources of the Marital Wage Premium," The American Economic Review, May. Becker, G. S. (1971), The Economics of Discrimination, The University of Chicago Press. Becker, Gary S., 1985. "Public Policies, Pressure Groups, and Dead-weight Costs," Journal of Public Economics, 28(3), pp. 329–347. Abstract and reprinted in George J. Stigler, ed., 1988, Chicago Studies in Political Economy, pp. 85-105. Cornwell, Christopher and Peter Rupert; (1997), "Unobservable Individual Effects, Marriage and the Earnings of Young Men", Economic Inquiry, Vol. 35. April., pp. 285-294. Das, Raju J.( Sep 22, 2006(), Putting Social Capital in Its Place, Capital and Class. Fine, B. 2001. Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. London:Routledge. Gray, Jeffrey S.; (1997) "The Fall in Men's Return to Marriage: Declining Productivity Effects or Changing Selection?", The Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1997, pp. 481-504 Hyde A. Notes on Human Capital < andromeda.rutgers.edu/~hyde/humancap.html Korenman, Sanders and David Neumark, (1991) "Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive?", in Journal of Human Resources, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 282-307 Loh, Eng Seng (1996), "Productivity Differences and the Marriage Wage Premium for White Males" in the Journal of Economic Resources, Summer 1996, vol. 31, no. 3, pp 566 590. Regan, m. 1999. Alone Together: Law and the Meanings of Marriage. New York. Rights. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger.