Mislan, Nora and Kosnin, Azlina Mohd and Jiar, Yeo Kee and Shariffudin, Rio Sumarni (2010): Teachers in action: delivering individualized education plan.
Download (281kB) | Preview
The role of teachers involved is very important for an individualised education plan (IEP) to serve its purpose to children with special needs. This is because they are engaged directly in the programme's implementation and in determining the children's learning. Additionally, the role would require them to forge collaboration with the parents for a successful programme. The objective of this research is to investigate the teachers' perceived role in the IEP. Two types of instruments were used; semi-structured interview on seven teachers and questionnaires on 17. Results indicate that the teachers believe they understood their roles and have met them. They also feel that involving parents in the programme is important. Planning and reporting on activities carried out is also important, but they should be receptive and sensitive in the process. Furthermore, they admit that they could improve further become more effective. To this, it is concluded that the school plays and important role in support of the teachers' growth and competency in the field.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Teachers in action: delivering individualized education plan|
|Keywords:||Teachers, individualized education plan, collaboration|
|Subjects:||L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L84 - Personal, Professional, and Business Services
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J24 - Human Capital ; Skills ; Occupational Choice ; Labor Productivity
|Depositing User:||nora mislan|
|Date Deposited:||12. Oct 2011 16:07|
|Last Modified:||15. Feb 2013 06:01|
1. Bateman, B. D., & Linden, M. A. (1998). Better IEPS: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programmes (3rd ed.). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
2. Brabeck, M. M., & Shirley, D. (2003). Excellence in schools of education: An oxymoron? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(5), 368-373.
3. Bratlien, M. J., & McGuire, M. A. (2002). Teachers for our nation’s schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Phi Delta Kappa District III, Tulsa, OK. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 471012).
4. Callicott, K. J. (2003). Culturally sensitive collaboration within person-centered planning. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18(1), 60-68.
5. Conoley, J. C. (1989). Professional communication and collaboration among educators. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
6. Couchenour, D., & Chrisman, K. (2004). Families, schools and communities together for young children (2nd ed.). Canada: Delmar Learning.
7. Cramer, S. F. (2006). The special educator’s guide to collaboration. USA: Cormin Press.
8. Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(2), 701-712.
9. Epstein, J., L., & Dauber, S. (1991). School programmes and teacher practices of parent involvement in Inner-City Elementary and Middle Schools. Elementary School Journal, 91, 289-306.
10. Foster, J. E. & Loven, R. G. (1992). The need and directions for parent involvement in the 90s: Undergraduate perspectives and expectations. Action in Teacher Education, 14 (3), 13-18.
11. Galinsky, E. (1990). Why Are Some Parent-Teacher Relationships Clouded with Difficulties? Young Children, 45, 38-39.
12. Gartin, B. C., Murdick, N. L., Thompson, J. R. & Dyches, T. T. (2002). Issues and challenges facing educators who advocate for students with learning disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37(1), 3-13.
13. Gerber, S. (1991). Supporting the collaborative process. Preventing School Failure, 35, 48-52.
14. Guernsey, T. F., & Klare, K. (1993). Special education law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
15. Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. W., Kauffman, J. M., Weiss, M. P., & Martinez, E. A. (2005). Learning disabilities: Foundations, characteristics, and effective teaching. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
16. Harris, B. J. G. (1998). Educators’ perceptions of the usefulness of the individualized education planning committee (IEPC) progress in special education in Michigan Public Schools. USA: University of Michigan.
17. Hasazi, S. B., Furney, K. S., & DeStefano, L. (1999). Implementing the IDEA transition mandates. Exceptional Children, 65, 555-566.
18. Hudson, P., Correa, V., Morsink, C., & Dykes, M. (1987). A new model for preservice training: Teachers as collaborators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 191-193.
19. Idol, L., & West, J. F. (1987). Consultation in special education (Part 2): Training and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 474-494.
20. Idol-Maestas, L., & Ritter, S. (1985). A follow-up study of resource/consulting teachers: Factors that facilitate and inhibit teacher consultation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 8, 121-131.
21. Lee-Tarver, A. (2005). Are individualized education plan a good thing? A survey of teachers’ perceptions of the utility of IEPs in regular education settings. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 263-272.
22. Lerner, J. (2002). Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies. (8th ed.). USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
23. Lynch, E. W., & Hanson, M. J. (1992). Parent participation by ethnicity: A comparison of Hispanic, black, and Anglo families. Exceptional Children, 54(2), 105-111.
24. Malone, D. M., Gallagher, P. A. & Long, S. R. (2001). General education teachers’ attitudes and perceptions of teamwork supporting children with developmental concerns. Early Education & Development, 12(4), 577-592.
25. Midkiff, R. B. & Lawler-Prince, D. (1992). Preparing tomorrow's teachers: Meeting the challenge of diverse family structures. Action in Teacher Education, 14 (3), 1-5.
26. National Council on Disability (1996). Improving the Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Making Schools Work for All of America’s Children. Washington, DC: National Council Disability (NCD).
27. Olive, M. L., & McEvoy, M. A. (2004). Issues, trends, and challenges in early intervention. in Sorrells, A. M., Rieth, H. J., & Sindelar, P. T. (Eds.), Critical issues in special education (pp. 92-105). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
28. O’Shea, D. J., & Lancaster, P. L. (2001). Families of students from diverse backgrounds. In O’Shea, D. J., O’Shea, L. J., Algozzine, R., & Hammitte, D. J. (Eds.), Families and teachers of individual disabilities: Collaborative orientations and responsive practices (pp.51-76). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Parke, R. D., & Locke, V. O. (2003). Child psychology: A contemporary viewpoint (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Phillip, V., & McCullough, L. (1990). Consultation-based programmeming: Instituting the collaborative ethic. Exceptional Children, 56, 291-304.
31. Rivera, D. P., & Smith, D. D. (1997). Teaching students with learning and behaviour problems. USA: Allyn & Bacon.
32. Shapiro, D. R. & Sayers, L. K. (2003). Who does what on the interdisciplinary team regarding physical education for students with learning disabilities? Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(6), 32-38.
33. Shea, T. M., & Bauer, A. M. (2003). Parents and schools: Creating a successful partnership for students with special needs. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
34. Shearin, A., Roessler, R., & Schriner, K. (1999). Evaluating the transition component in IEPs of secondary students with learning disabilities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 18, 22-35.
35. Smith, C. R. (2004). Learning disabilities: The interaction of students and their environments (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
36. Steinberg, L. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37. Swap, S. (1990). Schools reaching out and success for all children: Two case studies. Boston: Institute for Responsive Education.
38. Thomas, C. C., Correa, V. I., & Morsink, C. V. (1995). Interactive teaming: Consultation and collaboration in special programmes. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. Welch, M., & Sheridan, S. M. (1995). Educational partnerships: Serving students at risk. Orlando, USA: Harcourt Brace & Company.
40. Yi Ding, Gerken, K. C., VanDyke, D. C., & Fei Xiao (2006). Parents’ and special education teachers’ perspectives of implementing individualized instruction in P. R. China -an empirical and socio cultural approach. International Journal of Special Education, 21(3).