Growth and election outcomes in a developing country

Gupta, Poonam and Panagariya, Arvind (2011): Growth and election outcomes in a developing country.

Abstract

With the exception Brander and Drazen (2008), who use a comprehensive cross-country database consisting of both developed and developing countries, the hypothesis that rapid growth helps incumbents win elections has been tested exclusively for the developed countries (e.g., Ray Fair 1978). But since sustained rapid growth offers the prospect of pulling vast numbers of the voters out of poverty within a generation, such an effect is far more likely to be present in the developing rather than developed countries. In this paper, we offer the first test of the hypothesis on a large developing and poor country, India, which has seen its economy grow 8 to 9 percent recently. We first generalize the Fair model to allow for multiple candidates instead for just two and then test it using cross-state data. We find quantitatively large and statistically robust effect of growth on the prospects of the candidates of the state incumbent parties to win elections. Specifically, we use the data on 422 candidates in the 2009 parliamentary elections and show that the candidates of incumbent parties in high-growth states have much better prospects of victory than those in low-growth states.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: India, elections, growth, incumbents
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

References

Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. (1989). "Moderating Elections," NBER Working Papers 3072.

Bhagwati and Panagariya (2004), Great Expectations, Wall Street Journal, May 24, 2004.

Brender, Adi and Allan Drazen. (2008). “How Do Budget Deficits and Economic Growth Affect Reelection Prospects? Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries,” American Economic Review, 98:5, 2203–2220.

Fair, Ray C., 1978, The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for Presidents, The Review if Economic and Statistics, Vol. LX, Number 2, 159-173.

Gupta, Poonam and Arvind Panagariya. (2011). Economic reforms and Election Outcomes,” forthcoming in Bhagwati, Jagdish and Arvind Panagariya, ed., India: Trade, Poverty, Inequality and Democracy, New York: Oxford university Press.

Kaare Strom and Seymour M. Lipset (1984), “Macroeconomics and Macropolitics: The Electoral Performance of Democratic Governments.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.

Kramer, Gerald H., 1971, “Short Term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896-1964, The American Political Science Review 65, 131-143

Lewis-Beck, Michael S. 1988. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.

Paldam, Martin. 1991. “How Robust Is the Vote Function? A Study of Seventeen Nations over Four Decades.” In Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support, ed. H. Norpoth, M. S. Lewis-Beck, and J.-D. Lafay, 9–31. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Powell, Jr., G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.

Stigler, George J. 1973, “General Economic Conditions and National Elections”, The American Economic Review 63, 160-167.