On the distributional properties of size, pro fit and growth of Icelandic firms

Erlingsson, Einar Jón and Alfarano, Simone and Raberto, Marco and Stefánsson, Hlynur (2012): On the distributional properties of size, pro fit and growth of Icelandic firms.

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the distributional properties of the balance sheets of Icelandic firms by performing an empirical analysis of total assets, profit rates and growth rates using a data set of 2818 Icelandic firms during the period 2000-2009. We find that the firms size measure, i.e. total assets, have the same heavy tail characteristics as various studies have shown, e.g. for U.S. and Italian firms. The heavy tail nature of the total assets distribution seems to be robust w.r.t. a boom-bust cycle of the economy as well as special characteristics of Icelandic firms, e.g. their relatively small size and private ownership. Another important finding is that the profit rates, or return on assets, of Icelandic firms follow a Laplace like distribution similar to U.S. firms. Additionally, we identified deviations from the distributional regularities, namely the power law behavior of firms' size and laplacian distributions of growth and profit rates, during the booming period of the economy 2005-2007.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Firm size; Profit rates; Growth rates; Power law; Laplace distribution; Icelandic firms
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

References

Alfarano S, Milakovic M (2008) Does classical competition explain the statistical features of rm growth? Economics Letters 101(3):272-274.

Alfarano S, Milakovic M, Irle A, Kauschke J (2012) A statistical equilibrium model of competitive firms. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 36:136-149.

Atalay E, Hortasu A, Roberts J, Syverson C (2011) Network structure of production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(13):5199.

Axtell R (2001) Zipf distribution of us rm sizes. Science 293(5536):1818.

Baek S, Bernhardsson S, Minnhagen P (2011) Zipf's law unzipped. New Journal of Physics 13:043,004.

Bottazzi G, Secchi A (2006) Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates. The RAND Journal of Economic 37(2):235{256.

Champernowne D (1953) A model of income distribution. Economic Journal 83:318{351. Cincotti S, Raberto M, Teglio A (2010) Credit money and macroeconomic instability in the agent-based model and simulator eurace. The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 4(2010-26).

Cirillo P (2010) An analysis of the size distribution of italian rms by age. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 389(3):459{466.

Cirillo P, H�usler J (2009) On the upper tail of italian rms' size distribution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388(8):1546{1554.

De Wit G (2005) Firm size distributions:: An overview of steady-state distributions resulting from rm dynamics models. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23(5-6):423{450.

Farmer J, Foley D (2009) The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460(7256):685{686.

Gabaix X (2009) Power laws in economics and nance. Annual Review of Economics 1(1):255{294.

Gatti DD, Guilmi C, Gaeo E, Giulioni G, Gallegati M, Palestrini A (2005) A new approach to business fluctuations: heterogeneous interacting agents, scaling laws and nancial fragility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 56(4):489{512.

Gibrat R (1931) Les Ingalits Economique. Sirely, Paris

Ijiri Y, Simon HA (1974) Interpretations of departures from the pareto curve rm-size distributions. Journal of Political Economy 82(2):315{31.

M L Goldstein GGY S A Morris (2004) Problems with tting to the power-law distribution. The European Physical Journal B 41(2):255{258.

Myers S (1984) The capital structure puzzle. The Journal Of Finance 39(3).

Podobnik B, Horvatic D, Petersen A, Uroevi B, Stanley H (2010) Bankruptcy risk model and empirical tests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(43):18,325.

Puig P, Stephens M (2000) Tests of t for the laplace distribution, with applications. Technometrics pp 417{424.

Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2011) Debt deleveraging and business cycles. an agent-based perspective (2011-31), URL http://www.economics ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2011-31.

Simon H, Bonini C (1958) The size distribution of business rms. The American Economic Review 48(4):607{617.

Smets F, Wouters R, Europeo BC (2002) An estimated stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model of the euro area. European Central Bank.

Stanley M, Amaral LAN, Buldyrev SV, Leschhorn H, Maass P, Salinger M, Stanley HE (1996) Scaling behavior in the growth of companies. Nature 379:804{806.