Keswani Mehra, Meeta and Mukherjee, Saptarshi and Dutta, Monica (2012): Toward a framework for implementation of climate change treaty through self-enforcing mechanisms. Published in: ICRIER Working Paper Series , Vol. Workin, (December 2011): pp. 1-29.
Download (295kB) | Preview
Global warming caused by accumulation of emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is a public bad, addressing which requires collective action by all the countries of the world. Under the United Nations Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), most countries have negotiated the Kyoto Protocol for GHG emissions control to stabilize climate change. Several issues about the Protocol remain unresolved -- first, most of the significant countries are required to take a decision on whether or not to sign such a protocol, which has large-scale implications for their energy and industrial sectors and economic well-being; second, climate change mitigation is a public good entailing that all the countries would stand to gain due to mitigation action taken by a sub-group of one or more countries; and third, there exists no supra-national authority to enforce such a protocol for the individual sovereign nations. Thus, commitment to cooperate on an international agreement on climate change control remains tenuous. Formally, such a cooperative model is likely to be unstable. The paper discusses the pros and cons of the already proposed international cooperative mechanisms toward climate change mitigation and highlights the problem of information revelation, particularly related to the abatement issues. In this context, it attempts to outline a structure of a self-enforcing burden sharing mechanism for climate change mitigation in an incomplete information framework. The mechanism is an adoption of the well-known Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism, widely used in mechanism design theory.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Toward a framework for implementation of climate change treaty through self-enforcing mechanisms|
|English Title:||Toward a Framework for Implementation of Climate Change Treaty through Self-enforcing Mechanisms|
|Keywords:||Climate change negotiations; cooperative games; stable coalitions; self-enforcing mechanism|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations
D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||Meeta Kewani Mehra|
|Date Deposited:||30. Jan 2012 07:47|
|Last Modified:||22. Feb 2013 16:53|
1.Barret, S (1994). Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements. Oxford Economic Papers. 46, Pp 804-878.
2.Barrett, S. (1997). Toward a Theory of International Environmental Cooperation. Carraro, C. and Siniscalco (Eds.). New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment. Cambridge University Press. Pp 239 – 280.
3.BBC News (2010). Australia Shelves Key Emissions Trading Scheme. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8645767.stm
4.Berset, S. and Blaser, V. (2010). The Copenhagen Global Climate Change Negotiations: Did they Fail? Department of Economics, Working Papers, Faculty Economics and Social Sciences, Universitat Friburgensis.
5.Byrd-Hagel Resolution, 105th Congress, 1st Session http://www.nationalcenter.org/ KyotoSenate.html.
6.Carraro, C. (2000). Roads towards International Environmental Agreements. In Seibert, H. (Ed). The Economics of International Environmental Problems. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck. Pp 169-202.
7.Carraro, C, and Siniscalco, D. (1991). Strategies for International Protection of Environment. Working Paper 56:98. FEEM, Milan.
8.Carraro and Siniscalco, D. (1993). Strategies for International Protection of Environment. Journal of Public Economics. 52. Pp 309-328.
9.Chander, Prakash and Tulken, Henry (1997). The Core of the Economy with Multilateral Externalities. International Journal of Game Theory. 26(3). Pp 379-401.
10.Clarke, E. 1971. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice 8 19–33.
11.Climate Policy Post-Copenhagen: A Three-Level Strategy for Success, Policy Paper No. 6, German Advisory Council on Global Change, April 2010.
12.Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office (2008). Policy Options for Reducing CO2 Emissions. A CBO Study. February 2008. Pub. No. 2930.
13.Coopes, A. (2009). Australia Delays Emissions Trading. Available at http://news.theage.com.au/breaking-news-world/australia-delays-emissions-trading-20090504-asf5.html
14.D’Asperemont, C., A. Jacquemin, J.J. Gabszeweiz and J.A. Weymark (1983), On the Stability of Collusive Price Leadership. Canadian Journal of Economics. 16. Pp 17-25.
15.Dunne, P. (2009). Review of the Emissions Trading Scheme and Related Matters. Report of the Emissions Trading Scheme Review Committee. Forty-ninth Parliament. August 2009. Presented to the House of Representatives.
16.Ellerman, A. D. and Joskow, P.,L. (2008). The European Union’s Emissions Trading System in Perspective. Policy brief prepared for the Pew Center on Global Climate Change. May 2008.
17.Finus, M. (2001). Game Theory and International Environmental Cooperation. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, U.K.
18.Finus, M. (2003). Stability and Design of International Environmental Cooperation: the Case of Transboundary Pollution. Pp 82-158. In Folmer, H and Tietenberg, T (Eds). International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham, UK.
19.Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP (2010). Post-Copenhagen: Four Unavoidable Truths. January 2010. http://www.freshfields.com/publications/pdfs/2010/jan10/27416.pdf
20.Garnaut Climate Change Review (2008). Interim Report to the Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments of Australia. February 2008.
21.Grainger, C., A. and Kolstad, C. D. (2009). Who Pays A Price on Carbon? NBER Working Paper Series. August 2009. Working Paper 15239.
22.Government of India (GoI) (2009). The Road to Copenhagen: India’s Position on Climate Change Issues. Public Diplomacy Division, Ministry of External Affairs. Available at http://www.meaindia.nic.in.
23.Groves, T. 1973. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica 41 617–631.
24.Gurnsey, P. (2008). New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS). New Zealand Ministry for Environment. New Zealand Government. Available at http://www.icao.int/2008wacm/Docs/3_Gurnsey.pdf
25.Hasan, A. and Funston, L. (2008). The Introduction of Australia’s Emissions Trading Scheme. Report prepared by the Australian Institute of Management VT. July 2008.
26.The Japan Times (2010). Emissions Trading Plan Shelved until after ’13. Available at http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nb20101229a6.html
27.Joanna I. Lewis (2007). China’s Strategic Priorities in International Climate Change Negotiations. The Center for Strategic and International Studies and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Washington Quarterly, Winter 2007-08, 31:1 pp. 155-174.
28.Jiang, N., Sharp, B. and Sheng, M. (2009). New Zealand’s Emissions Trading Scheme. New Zealand economic papers, Apr 2009; v. 43, n. 1: p. 69-79. Available at http://www.business.auckland.ac.nz/Portals/4/Research/ResearchCentresGroups/Energy%20centre/Sharp-NZEP-on-ETS%20(2).pdf
29.Kruger, J. , Oates, W., E. and Pizer, W., A. (2007). Decentralization in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Lessons for Global Policy. Resources for the Future. February 2007. Discussion Paper 07-02.
30.Maleug, D., A. and Yates, A., J. (2009). Strategic Behaviour, Private Information, and Decentralization in the European Union Emissions Trading System. Environmental and Resource Economics (2009). Volume 43, Number 3, 413-432.
31.Maskin, E. (1999): “Nash Equilibrium and Welfare Optimality,” The Review of Economic Studies, 66 (1), 23–38.
32.Metcalf, G., E. (2009). Designing a Carbon Tax to Reduce U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, volume 3, issue 1, winter 2009, pp. 63-83. Downloaded from http://www.reep.oxfordjournals.org.
33.Moulin, H. (1979): “Dominance Solvable Voting Schemes, Econometrica, 47, 1337– 1351.
34.Nordhaus, W., D. (2007). To Tax or Not to Tax: Alternative Approaches to Slowing Global Warming. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, volume 1, issue 1, winter 2007, pp. 26-44. Downloaded from reep.oxfordjournals.org.
35.Nordhaus, W., D. (2006). After Kyoto: Alternative Mechanisms to Control Global Warming. Study Prepared for American Economic Association Session on Global Warming and the Kyoto Protocol. January 2006.
36.Oberthur, S. and Kelly, C. R. (2008). EU Leadership in International Climate Policy: Achievements and Challenges. The International Spectator, Vol. 43, No. 3, September 2008, pp 35-50.
37.Osborne, M.J., and Rubinstein, A. (1994). A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press.
38.Parker, L. (2010). Climate Change and the EU Emissions trading Scheme (ETS): Looking to 2020. CRS Report for Congress. Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress. Congressional Research Service. R41049. September 2010.
39.Ravindranath, N H and Sathaye, Jayant A (2002). Climate Change and Developing Countries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2002.
40.The Reality of Carbon Taxes in the 21st Century (2008). A Joint Project of the Environmental Tax Policy Institute and the Vermont Journal of Environmental Law. Western Newspaper Publishing Co. Available at http://www.vermontlaw.edu/Documents/020309-carbonTaxPaper(0).pdf
41.Shrum, T. (2007). Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Policy and Economics. A Report Prepared for the Kansas Energy Council Goals Committee. June 2007.
42.Stavins, R. N. (2008). Addressing Climate Change with a Comprehensive US Cap-and-Trade System. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 24, Number 2, 2008. Pp. 298-321.
43.Stavins, R. N. (2003). Market-Based Environmental Policies: What Can We Learn from U.S. Experience (and Related Research)? Resources for the Future. August 2003. Discussion Paper 03-43.
44.Stavins, R. N. (2001). Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments. Resources for the Future. November 2001. Discussion Paper 01-58.
45.Stern, Nicholas (2009). Action and Ambition for a Global Deal in Copenhagen. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Grantham Research Institute for Climate Change and the Environment. In collaboration with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
46.Sudo, T. (2006). Japanese Voluntary Emissions Trading Scheme (JVETS) ‒ Overview and Analysis. Presentation made at the US-Japan Workshop on Climate Actions and Co-benefit, March 22-23, 2006. Available at http://www.iges.or.jp/en/cp/pdf/activity06/07.pdf
47.Terrell, R. (2010). Japan Rejects Cap and Trade. Available at http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/tech-mainmenu-30/environment/5707-japan-rejects-cap-and-trade
48.UNFCCC website, GHG Data from UNFCCC. Available at: http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/items/3800.php . 49. UNFCCC website, GHG Data 2006, Highlights of GHG Emissions Data from 1990-2004 for Annex I Parties, Available at http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/ghg_booklet_06.pdf .
50.UNFCCC website (2010). Copenhagen Accord. Available at http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf
51.Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance 16 (1) 8–37.
52.Weitzman, Martin L. (1974). Prices vs. Quantities. The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 41(4). 1974. Pp. 477-491.
53.Wilder, M. and Fitz-Gerald, L. (2008). Overview of Policy and Regulatory Emissions Trading Frameworks in Australia. Australian Resources and Energy Law Journal (ARELJ), (2008), 27(1).
54.William Chandler (2008). Breaking the Suicide Pact: U.S. ‒ China Cooperation on Climate Change. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. May 2008.
55.Wood, P.J. (2010). Climate Change and Game Theory. Research Report No 62. Environmental Economics Research Hub. Crawford School of Economics and Government, The Australian National University. ISSN 1853-9728.
56.Wong, P. (2008). Climate Change: A Responsibility Agenda. Speech by the Minister for Climate Change and Water to the Australian Industry Group Luncheon. Melbourne. February 2008.