Impact of social capital on flexible work organisation models: comparative study of european countries

Ferreira, Pedro and Vieira, Elvira and Neira, Isabel (2009): Impact of social capital on flexible work organisation models: comparative study of european countries. Published in: Investigaciones de Economia de la Educación No. 4 (2009): pp. 171-180.

Abstract

The present economic context is heavily marked by a global crisis without precedents. Facing this constraint, companies feel pressured to undertake even greater efforts in order to optimize available resources. Work organisation is one of the mechanisms that managers use to align human resources with that kind of constraints and, thus, develop a better response to the market. Organisational literature shows that flexible and decentralized work organisation models are better suited to this need. These models stress the importance of human resources in promoting a flexible organization capable of change and adapt to market contingencies. This perspective can be seen on the adoption of participation, decentralization of the decision process and information, cooperation among workers through the implementation of working teams. The characteristics of human resources, namely their social and technical skills, knowledge and their ability to learn new things, are frequently pointed out as a key factor for the success of these models. The main goal of this paper is to understand the role of human and social capital for the success of flexible organisation practices. In order to accomplish this goal, it is developed an analysis of European countries from 1990 to 2005, using data from World Values Survey (WVS) and European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Work Organisation; HPWS; Social Capital; Europe
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L23 - Organization of Production; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M5 - Personnel Economics > M54 - Labor Management; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe

References

Adam, F. (2008). “Mapping social capital across Europe: findings, trends and methodological shortcomings of cross-national surveys”, Social Science Information, 47 (2), 159-186

Adler & Kwon (2002). “Social Capital: prospects for a new concept”, Academy of Management Review, 27 (1), 17-40

Akdere, M. & Roberts, P. B. (2008). “Economics of Social Capital: implications for organizational performance”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10 (6), 802-816

Appelbaum, E. & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace. Ithaca, New York: ILR Press

Arthur, J. B. (1994). “Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 670–687

Becker, B. E. & Huselid, M. A. (1998). “High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications”, Research in personnel and human resource management, 16, 53–101

Beltrán-Martín, I. et al. (2008). “Human Resource Flexibility as a Mediating Variable Between High Performance Work Systems and Performance”, Journal of Management, 34 (5), 1009- 1044

Boxall, P. & Macky, K. (2007). “High-performance work systems and organisational performance: bridging theory and practice”, Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45 (3), 261-270

Burt, R. S. (1997). “The contingent value of social capital”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (2), 339-365

Collins, C & Clark, K. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: the role of human resources practices in creating organizational competitive advantage, Academy of Management Journal, 46, 740-751

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, Harvard University Press

Dess, G. G. & Shaw, J. D. (2001). “Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance”, Academy of Management Review, 26 (3), 446-456

Evans, W. R. & Davis, W. D. (2005). “High-Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Internal Social Structure”, Journal of Management, 31 (5), 758-775

Fukuyama, F. (1995) Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity, New York, Free Press

Gant, J.; Ichniowski, C. & Shaw, K. (2002). “Social capital and organizational change in highinvolvement and traditional work organizations”, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11 (2), 289-328

Gittell, J. H.; Seidner, R. & Wimbush, J. (2007). “A social capital model of high performance work systems”, Sloan Industry Studies, Working Papers, No WP-2007-19 (http://www.industry.sloan.org/industrystudies/workingpapers)

Goshal, S. & Moran, P. (1996). “Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory, Academy of Management Review, 21, 13-47

Granovetter, M. (1985). “Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness”, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (3), 481-510

Guthrie, J. (2001). “High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand”, Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1), 180–190

Hirsch, P.& Levin, D. (1999). “Umbrella advocates versus validity police: a life-cycle model”, Organization Science, 10, 199-212

Ichniowsky, C. et al. (1997). “The effects of human resources management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines”, American Economic Review, 87 (3), 291–313.

Kaasa, A. & Parts, E. (2008). “Individual-Level Determinants of Social Capital in Europe. Differences between country groups”, Acta Sociologica, 51 (2), 145-168

Lawler, E. (1986). High-involvement management. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Leana, C. R. & Pil, F. K. (2006). “Social capital and organizational performance: evidence from urban public schools”, Organization Studies, 17, (3), 353-366

Leana, C. R. & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). “Organizational social capital and employment practices”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 538-555

Lindbeck, A. & Snower, D. J. (2000). “Multi-task learning and the reorganization of work: from tayloristic to holistic organization”, Journal of Labour Economics, 18 (3), 353-376

MacDuffie, J. P. (1995). “Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2), 197–221

Maseda, M. P.; Gómez, I. N. & del Oro, C. P. (2008). “Cómo medir el capital social? Hacia un indicador sintético de confianza”, in Gómez, I. N. et al. (coord.) Investigaciones de Economía de Educación, s.n.: AEDE, pp. 445-452

Nahapiet, J. & Goshal, S. (1998). “Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage”, Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242-266

Neira, I. et al. (2008). “An empirical analysis of social capital and economic growth in Europe (1980-2000)”, Social Indicators Research, DOI 10.1007/s11205-008-9292-x

Newton, K. (2001). “Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy”, International Political Science Review, 22, (2), 201-214

Pearce, N. & Smith, G. D. (2003). “Is social capital the key to inequalities in health”, American Journal of Public Health, 93 (1), 122-129

Pfeffer, J. (1998) The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First, Boston: Harvard Business School Press

Putnam, R. D. (1993). “The prosperous community”, The American Prospect, 4 (13), 35-42

Sabatini, Fabio (2006). “Does social capital improve labour productivity in small and medium enterprises?”, Working Paper No 92, Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica, Universita degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”

Tomer, J.F. (2001). “Understanding high-performance work systems: The joint contribution of economics and human resource management”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 63-73

Tsai, W. & Goshal, S. (1998). “Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks”, The Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4), 464-476

Westlund, H. & Bolton, R. (2003). “Local social capital and entrepreneurship, Small Business Economics, 21 (2), 77-113