El cobro por una factibilidad sostenible del agua y el crecimiento urbano disperso en el norte de México

Aguilar-Benitez, Ismael (2011): El cobro por una factibilidad sostenible del agua y el crecimiento urbano disperso en el norte de México. Published in: Economía Informa , Vol. Mayo-J, No. 368 : pp. 89-102.

Abstract

This work proposes to analyze the collection of urban water feasibility payments as a mechanism to control the urban dispersed growth in northern Mexico. This perspective tries to go beyond achieving the financial sustainability of the urban infrastructure and proposes to incorporate elements of urban sustainability. The essay analyzes two cases: the city of Saltillo Coahuila and the Nuevo León state.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Payment for urban water feasibility and the urban dispersed growth in Northern Mexico (a proposal)
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: urban water, water feasibility payments, northern Mexico
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L95 - Gas Utilities ; Pipelines ; Water Utilities; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

References

Asheesh, M. (2007), “Allocating gaps of shared wáter resources (scarcity index):case study on Palestine-Israel”, en Hillel Shuval y Hassan Dweik (eds.), Water Resources in the Middle East, Springer, chapter 24.

Besley, T. & Ghatak, M. (2003), Incentives, choice and accountability in the provision of public services, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19 (2), 235–249.

Buenfil Rodríguez, Mario (2009), ““El cobro por autorización a nuevos fraccionamientos como política pública en temas de agua”, ponencia escrita presentada en la Primera Reunión de la Red Temática del Agua Conacyt, 21-23 enero, Cocoyoc, Morelos; 25 pp.

Brueckner, Jan (2000), Urban Sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies, International Regional Science Review 23(2): 160-171.

Carrion y Libby (2004), Development Impact Fees: A Primer. Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics. The Ohio State University. Working Paper: AEDE-WP-0022-01.

Clinch P. y O’Neill, Eoin (2010), Designing Development Planning Charges. Urban Studies Journal 47(10) DOI: 10.1177/0042098009357968.

Griffin Ronald C. (2006), Water Resource Economics: The Analysis of Scarcity, Policies and Projects, The MIT Press. Hanak y Browne (2006), Linking Housing Growth to water Supply, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol 72. Num. 2. American Planning Association, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 154-166.

Singel y Lillydahle (1990), An empirical examination of the effect of impact fees on the housing market. Land Economis, vol 66. núm 1, pp. 82-92.

Speir y Stephenson (2002). Does sprawl costs us all? Journal of the American Planning Association, vol 68. Núm. 1. American Planning Association, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 56-70.

Sterner, Thomas, (2007), Instrumentos de Política económica para el Manejo del Ambiente y los Recursos Naturales. Resources for the Future-CATIE-Banco Mundial-Agencia Sueca de Cooperación internacional para el Desarrollo.

Young, Robert A. (2005), Determining the economic value of water. Concepts and Methods. Resources for the Future, RFF Press