Yoruk, Baris (2007): Human Capital, Innovation, and Productivity Growth: Tales from Latin America and Caribbean.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_3667.pdf Download (302kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Why have Latin American and Caribbean countries (LAC countries) not replicated Western economic success? We investigate the reasons behind the economic stagnation of LAC countries for the past four decades. We utilize a nonparametric Malmquist productivity index for relevant cross-country and over time productivity growth, technological change, and technical efficiency change comparisons. We document that productivity growth differences between LAC countries and Western countries can only partially be attributed to human capital differences. We argue that along with inefficient production, differences in civil, political, and economic policies and institutions are promising factors in explaining the long-run economic performance of LAC countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | Boston College |
Original Title: | Human Capital, Innovation, and Productivity Growth: Tales from Latin America and Caribbean |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Caribbean; Latin America; Institutions; Malmquist productivity index |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N26 - Latin America ; Caribbean P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems > P52 - Comparative Studies of Particular Economies |
Item ID: | 3667 |
Depositing User: | Baris Yoruk |
Date Deposited: | 21 Jun 2007 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 02:29 |
References: | [1] Acemoglu, D., Johnson S., and Robinson J., 2001. ‘The colonial origins of comparative development:An empirical investigation’, American Economic Review, 91, 1369-401. [2] Acemoglu, D., Johnson S., and Robinson J., 2002. ‘Reversal of fortune: Geography and development in the making of the modern world income distribution’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1231-1294. [3] Banker, R.D., 1996. ‘Maximum likelihood, consistency and data envelopment analysis: A statistical foundation’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 7, 139-59. [4] Barro, R.J. and Lee J.-W., 2001. ‘International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications’, Oxford Economic Papers, 53, 541-63. [5] Caves, D.W., Christensen, L.R., and Diewert,W.E., 1982. ‘The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity’, Econometrica, 50, 1393-1414. [6] CIA (2005). The World Factbook, Washington, DC. [7] Cole, H.L., Ohanian, L.E., Riascos, A., and Schmitz, J.A., 2005. ‘Latin America in the rearview window’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 69-107. [8] Easterly, W. and Levine R., 2003. ‘Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 3-39. [9] Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhongyang Z., 1994. ‘Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialized countries’, American Economic Review, 84, 66-83. [10] Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C.A.K., 1994. Production Frontiers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA. [11] Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., and Roos, P., 1998. Malmquist productivity indexes: A survey of theory and practice. In: Russell, Robert R., Färe, Rolf, Grosskopf, Shawna (Eds.), Index Number Theory: Essays in Honor of Sten Malmquist, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 127-190. [12] Farrell, M.J., 1957. ‘The measurement of productive efficiency’, Journal of Royal Statistics Society, Series A, 125, 252-67. [13] Freedom House, 2005. Freedom in the World Country Ratings, dataset, available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/ratings/index.htm. [14] Gong, B.H. and Sickles, R.C., 1992. ‘Finite sample evidence on the performance of stochastic frontiers and data envelopment analysis using panel data’, Journal of Econometrics, 51, 259-84. [15] Hall, R.E. and Jones, C.I., 1999. ‘Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83-116. [16] Hendricks, L., 2002. ‘How important is human capital for development? Evidence from immigrant earnings’, American Economic Review, 92, 198-219. [17] Hoogvelt, A., 2001. Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. [18] Islam, N., 1995. ‘Growth empirics: A panel data approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1127-70. [19] Krüger, J.J., 2003. ‘The global trends of total factor productivity: Evidence from the nonparametric Malmquist index approach’, Oxford Economic Papers, 55, 265-86. [20] Lall, P., Featherstone, A.M., and Norman, D.W., 2002. ‘Productivity growth in the western hemisphere (1978-94): The Caribbean perspective’, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 17, 213-31. [21] Lant, P., 1996. ‘Population growth, factor accumulation, and productivity’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No.1567. [22] Maudos, J., Pastor, J.M., and Serrano, L., 1999. ‘Total factor productivity measurement and human capital in OECD countries’, Economics Letters, 63, 39-44. [23] Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D., and Weil, D.N., 1992. ‘A contribution to the empirics of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-37. [24] Marquetti, A., 2004. Extended Penn World Tables 2.1, Data set, available at http://homepage.newschool.edu/~foleyd/epwt. [25] Shephard, R. W., 1970. Theory of Cost and Production Frontiers, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [26] Solow, R.M., 1957. ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 312-20. [27] World Bank, 2004. World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC. [28] Yörük, B.K. and Zaim, O., 2005. ‘Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 33, 401-20. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/3667 |