Product-market competition, corporate governance and innovation: evidence on US-listed firms

Hashem, Nawar and Ugur, Mehmet (2011): Product-market competition, corporate governance and innovation: evidence on US-listed firms.

Abstract

The debate on competition and innovation has produced a wide range of theoretical and empirical findings. Recently, corporate governance quality has emerged as an additional factor that may complement or substitute for competition’s effect on innovation. We aim to contribute to the debate by investigating whether product-market competition and corporate governance quality affect firm-level innovation, utilising a dataset for 1,400 non-financial US-listed companies. Using two-way cluster-robust estimation, we report several findings. First, the relationship between industry-level competition and input as well as output measures of innovation is non-linear. Secondly, the non-linear relationship is of an inverted-U shape with respect to input measures of innovation, but the relationship has a U-shape when output measure of innovation is estimated. Third, corporate governance indicators such as anti-takeover defences and insider control tend to have a negative effect on input measures of innovation but their effect is positive with respect to the output measure. Finally, when interacted with market concentration, anti-takeover defences and insider control emerge as substitutes, leading to sign reversals in the relationship between competition and innovation. The results are obtained by using two-way cluster-robust estimation that controls for dependence within company/year and industry/year clusters, but they are robust to different estimation methods including fixed-effect and Fama-Macbeth procedure.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Innovation, competition, corporate governance, two-way cluster-robust estimation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance

References

Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. 1992. “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica, 60(2): 323–351.

Aghion, Philippe, Mathias Dewatripont, and Patrick Rey. 1999. "Competition, Financial Discipline and Growth." The Review of Economic Studies 66: 825-852.

Aghion, Philippe, Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, and Peter Howitt. 2002a. "Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship." National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 9269.

Aghion, Philippe, Wendy Carlin and Mark Schaffer. 2002b. Competition, Innovation and Growth in Transition: Exploring the Interactions between Policies, William Davidson Working Paper Number 501 (March).

Aghion, P, and P. Howitt. 2002c. ‘Competition, Corporate Governance, and Growth’, unpublished notes.

Aghion, Philippe, Nick Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith, Peter Howitt. 2005. “Competition and Innovation: An inverted-U relationship”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2): 701-728.

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources to Invention."

Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., Miller, D. L., 2006a. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors, University of California, Davis working paper # 06-21.

Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., Miller, D. L., 2006b. Robust inference with multi-way clustering, working paper.

Fama, E. F., MacBeth, J. D., 1973. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. The Journal of Political Economy 81 (3), 607–636.

Gilbert, Richard 2006. Looking for Mr. Schumpeter: Where Are We in the Competition-Innovation Debate? In Adam B. Jaffe, Josh Lerner and Scott Stern (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy – Volume 6, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 159-215.

Gilbert, Richard, and David Newbery. 1982. "Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly." American Economic Review 72(2): 514-526.

Gow, Ian D., Gaizka Ormazabal and Daniel Taylor. 2010. Correcting for Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Dependence in Accounting Research, The Accounting Review 85 (2): 483-512.

Grosfeld, Irena and Tressel, Thierry. 2002. Competition and Ownership Structure: Substitutes or Complements? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. The Economics of Transition, 10(3): 525-551.

Hart, O .1983. ‘The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme’, Bell Journal of Economics, 14(Autumn): 366-382.

In R.R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Economic Activity. N.Y., Princeton University Press.

Newey, W. K., West, K. D., 1987. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55 (3), 703–708.

Petersen, Mitchell A. 2007. Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches.Review of Financial Studies, 22(1): 435-480.

Reinganum, Jennifer F. 1983. "Uncertain Innovation and the Persistence of Monopoly." American Economic Review 73: 741-748.

Reinganum, Jennifer F. 1985. "Innovation and Industry Evolution." Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 81-99.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.) First published in German, 1912.

Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. (Harper Colophon edition, 1976.)

Thompson, S., 2006. Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time, Working paper, Harvard University.

Wooldridge, J. M., 2003. Cluster-sample methods in applied econometrics. American Economic Review 93 (2), 133–138.