Davies, Ben and Richards, Caspian and Spash, Clive L. and Carter, Claudia (2004): Genetically modified organisms in agriculture: social and economic implications.
Download (441kB) | Preview
This paper argues that whether genetic modification of crops is seen as radically different or simply a further step of ‘traditional’ breeding techniques affects the perception of the associated benefits and risks of their commercialisation and the wider context scrutinised to assess potential consequences. Current risk regulation and GM legislation is narrowly defined, and largely concerned with scientific evidence of harm to human health and the environment. This contrasts with the public disquiet and a greater concern for overarching issues such as institutional and power structures (and the way political decisions are made), the role of science in society and the social and economic impacts of new technologies in the UK and abroad. The paper shows how the debate over GM technology has been framed and reflects the broader tensions within society. First, broadly political factors are discussed, followed by economic considerations to show how socio-economic factors influence and are influenced by novel technologies. Finally, welfare impacts and issues relating to less industrially developed economies are considered.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Genetically modified organisms in agriculture: social and economic implications|
|Keywords:||risk; uncertainty; ignorance; regulation; governance; public policy; science; technology; health; environment; genetic modification; agriculture; value conflict; corporate power|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q16 - R&D ; Agricultural Technology ; Biofuels ; Agricultural Extension Services
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy
D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
|Depositing User:||Clive L. Spash|
|Date Deposited:||30 Apr 2012 02:07|
|Last Modified:||18 Feb 2016 21:32|
AEBC, 2001. Crops on Trial. available on-line at http://www.aebc.gov.uk/aebc/crops.pdf.
BBC News, 2001. Finnie welcomes GM crops report. available on-line at http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsid_1535000/1535176.stm.
BBC News, 2003. US in new global GM push. available on-line at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3013394.stm.
Beck, U., 1992. From Industrial Society to the Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment. Theory, Culture & Society 19, 97-123.
Benbrook, C., 2000. Who controls and who will benefit from plant genomics? Presented at paper presented at 'The 2000 Genome Seminar: Genomic revolution in the fields: Facing the needs of the new millenium', AAAS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Bock, A., K. Lheureuz, M. Libeau-Dulos, H. Nilsagard and E. Rodriguez-Cerezo, 2002. Scenarios for co-existence of genetically modified, conventional and organic crops in European agriculture. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, Brussels.
Buckwell, A., G. Brookes and D. Bradley, 1998. Economics of Identity Preservation for Genetically Modified Crops. CEAS Report 1745/GJB. CEAS Consultants (Wye) Ltd, Wye, England.
Carr, S., 2000. EU safety regulation of genetically-modified crops. The Open University.
Carr, S. and L. Levidow, 2000. Exploring the links between science, risk, uncertainty, and ethics in regulatory contoversies about genetically modified crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 12, 29-39.
Clark, E. A., 1999. Genetic egineering in field crops: Ethics and academic. Presented at Paper presented to Annual Meeting of Saskatchewan Institute of Agrologists, April. Available at: http://www.plant.uoguelph.ca/research/homepages/eclark/ethics.htm.
Directorate-General for Agriculture, 2000. Economic Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops on the Agri-Food Sector: A First Review. Working Document Revision 2, Directorate-General for Agriculture, Commission of the European Communities.
FAO, 2001. Genetically Modified Organisms, Consumers, Food Safety and the Environment, FAO Ethics Series No. 2. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
FAO, 2002. Anti-Hunger Programme: Reducing hunger through agricultural and rural development and wider access to food, First Draft. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.
FOE, 1997. Shoppers Say 'No!' to Genetically Modified Food. published on-line at http://www.foe.org.uk/pubsinfo/infoteam/pressrel/1997/19970425112530.html.
FOE, 1998. Supermarket Shoppers Say No to Frankensten Food. published on-line at http://www.foe.org.uk/pubsinfo/infoteam/pressrel/1998/19981020114147.html.
Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz, 1992. Risk management as a post-normal science. Risk Analysis 12 (1), 95-97.
Gilland, T., 2000. Precaution, GM crops and farmland birds. In, Rethinking Risk and the Precautionary Principle, ed. Julian Morris. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, pp.
Graham, G., 1999. The Internet: a philosophical inquiry. Routledge, London. 60-83.
Habermas, J., 1992. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, translated by Thomas Burger & Patrick Lawrence. Polity Press, Cambridge.
James, C., 2001. Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2001. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA), Brief No 24: Preview, Ithica, New York.
Kydd, J., J. Haddock, J. Mansfield, C. Ainsworth and A. Buckwell, 2000. Genetically modified organisms: Issues for DFID's research programme, updated version of paper for UK Department of International Development (DFID), Crop Post Harvest Research Programme. Presented at Presented at Agricultural Economics Society Annual Conference, Manchester, April 15th.
Levidow, L. and C. Marris, 2001. Science and governance in Europe: lessons from the case of agricultural biotechnology. Science and Public Policy 28 (5), 345-360.
Loasby, B. J., 1976. Choice, Complexity and Ignorance: An Inquiry into Economic Theory and the Practice of Decision-Making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Marris, C., B. Wynne, P. Simmons and S. Weldon, 2001. Public Perceptions of Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe: Final Report of the PABE research project, published on-line at http://www.pabe.net.
McCloughlin, M., 1999. Ten reasons why biotechnology will be important to the developing world. AgBioForum 2 (2-3), 1163-1174.
McHughen, A., 2000. A Consumer's Guide to Genetically Modified Food. OUP, Oxford.
Morris, S. H. and C. C. Adley, 2001. Irish public perceptions and attitudes to modern biotechology: an overview with a focus on GM foods. Trends in Biotechnology 19 (2), 43-48.
Nelson, G., A. De Pinto, D. Bullock, E. Nitsi, M. Rosegrant, T. Josling, J. Babinard, C. Cunningham, L. Unnevehr and L. Hill, 1999. The Economics and Politics of Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture: Implications for WTO 2000. Bulletin 809. University of Illinios at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC).
Norgaard, R. B., 1994. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and a Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future. Routledge, London.
Sen, A., 1986. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England.
Spash, C. L., 1995. The political economy of nature. Review of Political Economy 7 (3), 279-293.
Spash, C. L., 2002. Greenhouse Economics: Value and Ethics. Routledge, London.
Toke, D., 2002. UK GM Crop Policy: Relative Calm before the Storm? The Political Quarterly 73 (1), 67-75.
Wilkinson, M. J., L. J. Elliot, J. Allainguillaume, M. W. Shaw, C. Norris, R. Welters, M. Alexander, J. Sweet and D. C. Mason, 2003. Hybridization between Brassica napus and B. rapa on a national scale in the United Kingdom. Science 302, 457-459.
Wright, J., 2000. 'The Economics of Genetic Modification', Background Paper on Economics for New Zealand Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. Christchurch, New Zealand. Available on-line at http://www.gmcommission.govt.nz/publications/Economic_Issues_Jan_Wright.pdf.
Wynne, B., 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning: Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change (June), 111-127.