Tang, Chor Foon (2009): Does causality technique matter to savingsgrowth nexus in Malaysia? Published in: Malaysian Management Journal , Vol. 13, No. 12 (2009): pp. 110.

PDF
MPRA_paper_38535.pdf Download (223kB)  Preview 
Abstract
The intention of this study was to investigate whether the causal inference between savings and economic growth in Malaysia is sensitive to the particular causality tests employed to ascertain the causal relationship. This study covered quarterly data from 1991:Q1 to 2006:Q3. The results suggested that the causal relationship between savings and economic growth in Malaysia is not sensitive to the particular causality test used. Thus, causality test plays no role in explaining the inconsistency causality result of savings and economic growth. Ultimately, causality test does not matter to savingsgrowth nexus for Malaysia.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Does causality technique matter to savingsgrowth nexus in Malaysia? 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Causality; parametric; nonparametric; savings; growth 
Subjects:  C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1  Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C14  Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General O  Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1  Economic Development > O16  Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2  Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22  TimeSeries Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes E  Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2  Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21  Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth 
Item ID:  38535 
Depositing User:  Chor Foon Tang 
Date Deposited:  03. May 2012 12:51 
Last Modified:  11. Sep 2015 20:20 
References:  Agrawal, P. (2001). The Relation between Saving and Growth: Cointegration and Causality Evidence from Asia. Applied Economics, 33, 499513. Alguacil, M., Cuadros, A., & Orts, V. (2004). Does saving really matter to growth? Mexico (19702000). Journal of International Development, 16(2), 281290. Ansari, M.I., Gordon, D.V., & Akuamoah, C. (1997). Keynes versus Wagner: Public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Applied Economics, 29, 543550. Baharumshah, A.Z., Thanoon, M.A., & Rashid, S. (2003). Saving Dynamics in the Asian Countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 13(6), 827845. Campbell, J.Y., & Perron, P. (1991). Pitfalls and opportunities: What macroeconomists should know about unit roots, National Bureau of Economic Research, Macroeconomics Annual, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 141201. Carroll, C.D., Overland, J., & Weil, D.N. (2000). Saving and growth with habit formation. American Economic Review, 90, 341355. Chowdury, R.A. (1987). Are causal relationship sensitive to causality tests? Applied Economics, 19, 459465. Damor, E.D. (1946). Capital expansion, rate of growth, and employment. Econometrica, 14(1), 137147. DeJong, D.A., Nankervis, J.C., Savin, N.E., & Whiteman, C.H. (1992). Integration versus trend stationarity in time series. Econometrica, 60, 423433. Dolado, J.J., & Lütkepohl, H. (1996). Making Wald tests work for cointegrated VAR system. Econometric Reviews, 15, 369386. Enders, W. (2004). Applied Econometric Time Series (2nd ed.). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons. Granger, C.W.J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 428438. Granger, C.W.J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regression in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2, 111120. Gordon, D.V., & SakyiBekoe, K. (1993). Testing the exportgrowth hypothesis: Some parametric and nonparametric results for Ghana. Applied Economics, 25, 553563. Geweke, J., Meese, R., & Dent, W. (1983). Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems. Journal of Econometrics, 21, 161194. Gruben, W., & Mcleod, D. (1998). Capital flows savings and growth in the 1990s. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38, 287. Harrod, R.F. (1939). Toward A Dynamic Economics. London: Macmillan and Co. Ltd. He, Z., & Maekawa, K. (2001). On spurious Granger causality. Economics Letters, 73(3), 307313. Hsiao, C. (1981). Autoregressive modeling and moneyincome causality detection. Journal of Monetary Economics, 7, 85106. Holmes, J.M., & Hutton, P.A. (1988). A functionalform distributionfree alternative to parametric analysis of Granger causal models. Advances in Econometrics, 7, 211225. Holmes, J.M., & Hutton, P.A. (1990a). On the causal relationship between government expenditure and national income. Reviews of Economics Statistics, 72(1), 8795. Holmes, J.M., & Hutton, P.A. (1990b). Small sample properties of the multiple rank Ftest with lagged dependent variables. Economics Letters, 33, 5561. Koutsoyiannis, A. (1977). Theory of Econometric: An Introductory Exposition of Econometric (2nd ed.). London: The MacMillan Press Ltd. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that the economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159178. Lee, H.Y., Lin, K.S., & Wu, J.L. (2002). Pitfalls in using Granger causality tests to find an engine of growth. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 411414. Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross countries growth regression. American Economic Review, 82, 942963. Lewis, W.A. (1955). Theory of Economic Growth. London: Allen and Unwin, Ltd. Liew, K.S. (2004). Which lag length selection criteria should we employ? Economics Bulletin, 3(33), 19. Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D., & Weil, D.N. (1992). A contribution to empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economic, 11, 681712. Mavrotas, G., & Kelly, R. (2001). Old Wine in New Bottles: Testing Causality between Savings and Growth. The Manchester School Supplement, 69(s1), 97105. Nelson, C.R., & Plosser, C.I. (1982). Trends and random walks in macroeconomics time series. Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 139162. Phillips, P.C.B. (1986). Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 33(3), 311340. Rodrik, D. (2000). Saving transitions. The World Bank Economic Review, 14, 481507. Sims, C.A. (1972). Money, income and causality. American Economic Review, 62, 540552. Sinha, D., & Sinha, T. (1998). Cart before the horse? The savinggrowth nexus in Mexico. Economics Letters, 61, 4347. Tang, C.F. (2008a). An empirical modelling on savings behaviour in Malaysia. Labuan Bulletin of International Business & Finance, 6, 5776. Tang, C.F. (2008b). Wagner law versus Keynesian hypothesis: New evidence from recursive regressionbased causality tests. ICFAI Journal of Public Finance, 6(4), 2938. Tang, C.F., & Lean, H.H. (2008). New evidence from the misery index in the crime function. Economics Letters, 102(2), 112115. Thornton, D.L., & Batten, D.S. (1985). Laglength selection and tests of Granger causality between money and income. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(2), 164178. Toda, H.Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66, 225250. Xu, Z. (1996). On the causality between export growth and GDP growth: An empirical reinvestigation. Review of International Economics, 4, pp. 172184. Zhou, S. (2001). The power of cointegration tests versus data frequency and time spans. Southern Economic Journal, 67(4), 906921. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/38535 