Environmental efficiency indices: towards a new approach to green-growth accounting

Peroni, Chiara (2012): Environmental efficiency indices: towards a new approach to green-growth accounting.

Abstract

This article analyses the link between environmental and productive efficiency in a group of EU member states and the US using data from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Its main indicator, carbon intensity, is defined as the ratio of total greenhouse gases emissions to output. A non-parametric frontier approach enables modelling a multiple output technology in which greenhouse gas emissions are an undesirable outcome of a production process. A DEA method is used to compute environmental efficiency indices, which grade countries according to their ability to increase production while reducing pollutants, under minimal assumptions. The only assumptions are that bad outputs are costly to dispose of and that returns to scale are variable. The study shows that productive efficiency is considerably lowered when environmental degradation are taken into account. Only two (Luxembourg and Sweden) out of 16 countries are environmentally efficient. Malmquist indices, however, show that environmental performances improved over the period considered in nearly all countries. A decomposition of carbon intensity, which links emission performance to technical progress, is also presented; this highlights the positive contribution of labour productivity on the reduction in carbon intensity. Finally, no evidence of a DEA-based environmental Kuznet curve is found.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Carbon intensity; data envelopment analysis; Malmquist index; decomposition; Kuznet curve
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C44 - Operations Research ; Statistical Decision Theory; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Ang, B. (1999). Is the energy intensity a less useful indicator than the carbon factor in the study of climate change? Energy Policy, 27:943-946.

Caves, D., Christensen, L., and Diewert, W. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50:73-86.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the eciency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2:429-444.

Chen, P. and Yu, M. (2012). Total factor productivity growth and directions of technical change bias: evidence from 99 oecd and non-oecd countries. Annals of Operations Research, Online First.

Corrado, C., Hulten, C., and Sichel, D. (2009). Intangible capital and u.s. economic growth. Review of Income & Wealth, 55:661-685.

DiMaria, C. and Ciccone, J. (2008). Luxklems: Productivite et competitivite. Perpectives de Politique Economique, N 8, Le Gouvernment du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.

Fare, R. and Grosskopf, S. (2004). Modelling undesirable factors in efficiency valuation: a comment. European Journal of Operational Research, 157:242-245.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C., and Pasurka, C. (1989). Multilateral productivity comparison when some outputs are undesirable. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71:90-98.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C. K. (1994a). Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., and Zhongyang, Z. (1994b). Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency change in industrialised countries. American Economic Review, 84:666-83.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Sancho, F. H. (2004). Environmental performance: an index number approach. Resource and Energy economics, 26:343-{352.

Farrell, M. (1957). The measurement of productive eciency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120:253-90.

Hua, Z., Bian, Y., and Liang, L. (2007). Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the huai river: An extended DEA approach. Omega, 35:578 - 587.

Kumar, S. and Russell, R. (2002). Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence. The American Economic Review, 92:527-48.

Peroni, C. (2012). Productivity and competitiveness in luxemnbourg; productivity & the crisis. Perpectives de Politique Economique, N 18, Ministère de l'economie e du commerce exterieur du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg.

Ravishankara, A., Daniel, J., and Portmann, R. (2009). Nitrous oxide (n2o): The dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science, 326:123-125.

Tyteca, D. (1996). On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms. Journal of environmental management, 46:281-308.

Tyteca, D. (1997). Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental per- formance of firms: concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 8:183-197.

Zaim, O. and Taskin, F. (2000a). Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the oecd: a non-parametric approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 58:95{107.

Zaim, O. and Taskin, F. (2000b). A kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: an application to OECD countries. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 17:21-36.

Zhou, P., Ang, B., and Poh, K. (2006). Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance. Ecological Economics, 60:111-118.

Zhou, P., Ang, B., and Poh, K. (2008). Measuring environmental performance under different environmental technologies. Energy Economics, 30:1-14.

Zhou, P., Ang, B., and Poh, K. (2010). Total factor carbon emission performance: a Malmquist index analysis. Energy Economics, 32:194-201.