A rationale for intra-party democracy

Zudenkova, Galina (2012): A rationale for intra-party democracy.

Abstract

This paper provides a rationale for intra-party democracy within a political agency model with moral hazard. The focus is on the party's internal procedures for policy determination. I show that democratizing those procedures benefits the party leadership, which seeks to maximize joint reelection chances of the party's incumbents. The reason is that under intra-party democracy, the voters adopt less demanding reappointment rules and reelect the party's incumbents more often than under leaders-dominated party structure. My results therefore indicate that democratizing policy determination processes within the party is in the interests of both the leadership and the ordinary members. The voters in turn are equally well off regardless of the party's internal procedure for policy determination.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Intra-party democracy; Leaders-dominated party; Policy determination; Party internal structure; Political agency; Moral hazard
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

References

Adams, James, and Samuel Merrill, III, 2008. "Candidate and Party Strategies in Two-Stage Elections Beginning with a Primary," American Journal of Political Science, 52, 344-359.

Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey S. Banks, 1989. "Electoral Accountability and Incumbency," in P. C. Ordeshook, ed., Models of Strategic Choice in Politics. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.

Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey S. Banks, 1996. "Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem," American Political Science Review, 90, 34-45.

Banks, Jeffrey S., and Rangarajan K. Sundaram, 1993. "Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in a Repeated Elections Model," in W. Barnett, M. Hinich, and N. Schofield, ed., Political Economy: Institutions, Information, Competition and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Banks, Jeffrey S., and Rangarajan K. Sundaram, 1996. "Electoral Accountability and Selection Effects," University of Rochester, mimeo.

Barro, Robert, 1973. "The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model," Public Choice, 14, 19-42.

Castanheira, Micael, Benoît S Y Crutzen, Nicolas Sahuguet, 2012. "The Impact of Party Organization on Electoral Outcomes," Revue Economique, forthcoming.

Colomer, Josep M., 2005. "Policy Making in Divided Government: A Pivotal Actors Model with Party Discipline," Public Choice, 125, 247-269.

Diermeier, Daniel, and Timothy J. Feddersen, 1998a. "Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure," American Political Science Review, 92, 611-621.

Diermeier, Daniel, and Timothy J. Feddersen, 1998b. "Comparing Constitutions: Cohesion and Distribution in Legislatures," European Economic Review, 42, 665-672.

Duverger, Maurice, 1964. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eguia, Jon X., 2011. "Voting Blocs, Party Discipline and Party Formation," Games and Economic Behavior, 73, 111-135.

Feddersen, Timothy, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 1998. "Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting," American Political Science Review, 92, 23-35.

Ferejohn, John, 1986. "Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control," Public Choice, 50, 5-26.

Fréchette, Guillaume R., Francois Maniquet, and Massimo Morelli, 2008. "Incumbents' Interests and Gender Quotas," American Journal of Political Science, 52, 891-909.

Hazan, Reuven Y., and Gideon Rahat, 2010. Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Iaryczower, Matias, 2008. "Contestable Leadership: Party Leaders as Principals and Agents," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 3, 203-225.

Jackson, Matthew O., Laurent Mathevet, and Kyle Mattes, 2007. "Nomination Processes and Policy Outcomes," Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2, 67-94.

Katz, Richard, and Peter Mair, 2002. "The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Changes in Twentieth-Century Democracies," in Richard Gunther, Jose Ramon Montero, and Juan J. Linz, ed., Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kirchheimer, Otto, 1966."The transformation of the Western European party systems," in Joseph LaPalombara, and Myron Weiner, ed., Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Levy, Gilat, 2007. "Decision Making in Committees: Transparency, Reputation, and Voting Rules," American Economic Review, 97, 150-168.

McGillivray, Fiona, 1997. "Party Discipline as a Determinant of the Endogenous Formation of Tariffs," American Journal of Political Science, 41, 584-607.

Meirowitz, Adam, 2005. "Informational Party Primaries and Strategic Ambiguity," Journal of Theoretical Politics, 17, 107-136.

Michels, Robert, 1915. Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: The Free Press.

Patty, John W., 2008. "Equilibrium Party Government," American Journal of Political Science, 52, 636-655.

Persico, Nicola, 2004. "Committee Design with Endogenous Information," Review of Economic Studies, 71, 165-191.

Persson, Torsten, Gérard Roland, and Guido Tabellini, 1997. "Separation of Powers and Political Accountability," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1163-1202.

Scarrow, Susan, 1999. "Parties and the Expansion of Direct Democracy : Who Benefits?" Party Politics, 5, 341-362.

Scarrow, Susan, 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Implementing Intra-Party Democracy. Washington: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.

Schattschneider, Elmer Eric, 1942. Party Government. New York, Farrar & Rinehart, Inc.

Serra, Gilles, 2011. "Why Primaries? The Party's Tradeoff between Policy and Valence," Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23, 21-51.

Teorell, Jan, 1999. "A Deliberative Defence of Intra-Party Democracy," Party Politics, 5, 363-382.

Tullock, Gordon, 1980. "Efficient Rent Seeking," in James Buchanan, Roger Tollison, and Gordon Tullock, ed., Towards a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, Texas.

Visser, Bauke, and Otto H. Swank, 2007. "On Committees of Experts," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 337-372.

Volden, Craig, and Elizabeth Bergman, 2006. "How Strong Should Our Party Be? Party Member Preferences Over Party Cohesion," Legislative Studies Quarterly, XXXI, 71-104.