Sen, S. K. and Mukhopadhyay, I and Gupta, S (2011): A Game Theoretic Analysis of a Regional Approach toward the Sustainability of Kolkata-Agartala Transit Route.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39118.pdf Download (720kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper attempts to explore the possibilities of a viable transport network in the long run which can respond to the demand for communication by people of Tripura as well as the demand of Tripura’s projected economy. Since, Tripura is constantly facing the problem of lack of a smooth transportation and naturally, it is an economic imperative for this landlocked state to seek benefits for itself through greater regional integration. Most of the cargo originates from Kolkata (Port) and terminates at Guwahati and distributed to various destinations of north eastern states. This paper examines the perspectives of such cargo movement from Kolkata to Agartala and the strategic options of the transiting countries, namely Bangladesh and Myanmar. The development of a new transit route through Myanmar, depriving Bangladesh of its former monopoly, has modified the situation profoundly. The thrust of the paper is an analysis of the strategies that Bangladesh and Myanmar may pursue in transiting cargo for Agartala in terms of a game theoretic structure. The long run sustainability of such transit route from Kolkata to Agartala depends on regional cooperation among these countries in a political emotional state of nature.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Game Theoretic Analysis of a Regional Approach toward the Sustainability of Kolkata-Agartala Transit Route |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Transit Fees, Game Theory, Monopoly, Bertrand Competition |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R48 - Government Pricing and Policy |
Item ID: | 39118 |
Depositing User: | Subir Kumar Sen |
Date Deposited: | 30 May 2012 11:11 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 18:45 |
References: | Almaty Programme of Actions. (2003). Addressing the Special Needs of Landlocked. Almati: The World Bank. Amjadi, A., & Yeats, J. (1995). “Have Transport Costs Contributed to the Relative. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. Arvis, J. F. (2005). Transit and the Special Case of Landlocked Countries. In L. Wolf, & J. Sokol, Customs Modernisation Handbook. Washington: The World Bank. Arvis, J. F., Mustra, M. A., Panzer, J., Ojala, L., & Naula, T. (2007). Connecting to Compete- – Trade Logistics in the Global Economy. From: http://www.worldbank.org/lpi (Accessed on January 21, 2011): The World Bank. Bloom, J. G., & Williamson, D. E. (1998). Demographic Transition and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia. The World Bank Economic Review , 12 (3), pp.419-455. Das, P. (2009). Evolution of the Road Network in Northeast India:. Strategic Analysis , 33:1, pp.101-106. Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., & Mellinger, A. (1999). Geography and Economic Development. Geneva: CID. Islam, S. (2008). Bangladesh-China-Northeast India: Opportunities and Anxieties, From:http://www.isas.nus.edu.sg/Attachments/PublisherAttachment/ISAS_Insights_37_21102009185912.pdf (Accessed on December 12, 2009) Limao, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs and Trade. World Bank Economic Review , 15 (3), pp.451-479. Mackellar, L., Wörgötter, A., & Wörz, J. (2002). Economic Growth of Landlocked Countries. Berlin: Springer. Maunder et al. (2004). Improving Transport Access and Mobility for the People with Disabilitie. London: United Kingdom Department for International Development (NFID). Murshid, K. A. (2011). Transit and Tran-shipment: Strategic Considerations for Bangladesh and India. Economic & Political Weekly , XLVI (17), pp.43-51. Rahamathula, M. (2004). Integrating Transport System of South Asia. In R. Sobhan, Promoting Cooperation in South Asia: An Agenda for 13th SAARC Summit. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialague and University Press. Radelet, J. D., & Sachs, J. (1998). Shipping Costs, Manufactured Exports, and Economic. Mimeo. Sachs, J., Faye, M., McArthur, J., & Snow, T. (2004). The Challeanges facing Landlocked Developing Countries. Journal of Human Development , 5, pp.319-332. Sen, S. K., Gupta, S., & Mukhopadhayay, I. (2011). Optimal Pricing Policy of Continental Transit Route: A Study of Kolkata-Agartala Transit Route. International Conference onChanging Structure of International Trade and Investment: Implications for Growth & Development, 2-3 March. Jamia Milia Islamia, New Delhi.pp. 121-140 Sobhan, R. (2000). Rediscovering the Southern Silk Route: Intrgrating Asia's Transport Infraastructure. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue and University Press. Stone, J. I. (2001). Infrastructure Development in Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries Foreign Aid, Private Investment and the Transport Cost Burden of Landlocked Developing Countries. Geneva: UNCTAD. UNCTAD. (2003). Improving Trade and Development Prospectus of Landlocked and Transit Developing Countries. Geneva: UNCTAD. UNCTAD. (2002). Landlocked Countries : Opportunities, Challenges, Recommendations. Geneva: UNCTAD. UNCTAD. (2004). Report of the Expert Meeting on the Design and Implementation of Transit Transport Arrangements. Geneva: UNCTAD. Ventor, C., Rickett, T., & Maunder, D. (2003). From basic rights to full access: Elements of current accessibility practice in developing countrie. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. World Bank. (2004). Trade Policies in South Asia: An Overview. Washington, D.C.: Report 29949. World Bank. (2008). World Integrated Trade Solution. Washington D.C.: WITS Zaman, H. (2011). An Edgeworth Box Approach toward Conceptualising Economic Integration. Modern Economy , 2, pp.62-70. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39118 |