Two explanations to the willingness to accept and willingness to pay gap plus an alternative

Beja Jr, Edsel (2012): Two explanations to the willingness to accept and willingness to pay gap plus an alternative.

Abstract

The gap between the willingness to accept and willingness to pay is the outcome of incomplete valuation. The problem therefore is more about completing the valuation procedure. The first part of the solution involves two items: one is the inclusion of the direct and indirect income effects and the other is the inclusion of the substitution effect between the numeraire good (i.e., income) and the good under consideration. The second part of the solution concerns the respective hedonic content of income, the good, and the setting. These two explanations point to a third solution that puts the setting together with the income and substitution effects.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Willingness to accept; willingness to pay; subjective well-being
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C60 - General; H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H40 - General; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D60 - General; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D00 - General

References

Andrews, F. and Withey, S. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality, New York: Plenum

Becker, G., DeGroot, M. and Marschak, J. (1964). “Measuring utility by a single-response sequence method,” Behavioral Science, 9(3): 226-232

Boyce, R., Brown, T., McClelland, G., Peterson, G., and Schulze, W. (1992). “An experimental examination of intrinsic values as a source of the WTA-WTP disparity,” American Economic Review, 82(5): 1366-1373

Brickman, P. and Campbell, D. (1971). “Hedonic relativism and planning the good society,” in M. Appley (eds.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287-302), New York: Academic Press

Campbell, A., Converse, P. and Rodgers, W. (1976). The quality of American life, New York: Russell Sage

Cantril, Hadley (1965). The pattern of human concerns, New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press

Clark, A., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., and Lucas, R. (2008). “Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis,” Economic Journal, 118(529): F222-F243

Costa, P. and McCrae, R. (1988). “Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4): 853-863

Coursey, D., Hovis, J., and Schulze (1987). “The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3): 679-690

Davidson, R. (2003). “Affective neuroscience and psychophysiology: Toward a synthesis,” Psychophysiology, 40(5), 655-665

Derrick, W., Kruger, J., Napa-Scollon, C., Diener, E. (2003). “What to do on spring break? The role of predicted, on-line, and remembered experience in future choices,” Psychological Science, 14(5): 520-524

Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2000). “Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods,” Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1): 60-71

Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., and Oswald, A. (2001). “Preferences of inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness,” American Economic Review, 91(1): 335-341

Diener, E. and Emmons, R. (1985). “The independence of positive and negative affect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(5): 71-75

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., and Griffin, S. (1985). “The satisfaction with life scale,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1): 71-75

Easterlin, R. (1974). “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence,” in: P. David and M. Reder (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89-125), New York: Academic Press

Easterlin, R. (2001). “Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory,” Economic Journal, 111(473): 465-484

Ehrhardt, J., Saris, W., and Veenhoven, R. (2000). “Stability of life satisfaction over time: Analysis of change in ranks in a national population,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2): 177-205

Ekman, P., Davidson, R., and Friesen, W., (1990). “The Duchenne smile: Emotional expression and brain physiology II,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2): 342-353

Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. and van Praag, B. (2002). “The subjective costs of health losses due to chronic diseases: An alternative model for monetary appraisal,” Health Economics, 11(8): 709-722

Frank, R. (1985). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status, New York: Oxford University Press

Frederick, S., and Loewenstein, G. (1999). “Hedonic adaptation,” in D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302-329), New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Frey, B., Luechinger, S., and Stutzer, A. (2010). “The life satisfaction approach to environmental valuation,” Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2010(1): 139-160

Gilbert, D. (2006). Stumbling on happiness, London: Harper Perennial

Gregory, T. and Brown, R. (1999). “Why the WTA-WTP disparity matters,” Ecological Economics, 28(3): 323-335

Hanemann, M. (1991). “The willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ?,” American Economic Review, 81(3): 635-647

Harowitz, J. and McConnell, K. (2002). “A review of the WTA/WTP studies,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44(3): 426-447

Headey, B. and Wearing, A. (1989). “Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4): 731-739

Henderson, A. (1941). “Consumer’s surplus and the compensating variation,” Review of Economic Studies, 8(2): 117-121

Hicks, J. (1939). Value and Capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hicks, J. (1941). “The rehabilitation of consumer surplus,” Review of Economic Studies, 8(2): 108-116

Kahneman, D. and Knetsch, J. (1992). “Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1): 57-70

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). “Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk,” Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. and Thaler, R. (1990). “Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase Theorem,” Journal of Political Economy, 98(6): 1325-1348

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. and Thaler, R. (1991). “Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1): 193-206 Knetsch, J. (1990). “Environmental policy implications of disparities between willingness to pay and compensation demanded for measures of values,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(3): 227-237

Knetsch, J. and Wong, W.-K. (2009). “The endowment effect and the reference state: Evidence and manipulations,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2): 407-413

Köszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006). “A model of reference-dependent preferences,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4): 1133-1165

Krueger, A. and Schkade, D. (2008). “The reliability of subjective well-being measures,” Journal of Public Economics, 92(8-9): 1833-1845

Krutilla, J. (1967). “Conservation reconsidered,” American Economic Review, 57(4): 777-786

Loewenstein, G. (1996). “Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3): 272-292

Loewenstein, G. and Prelec, D. (1993), “Preferences for sequences of outcomes,” Psychological Review, 100(1), 91-108

Lucas, R., Diener, E., and Suh, E. (1996). “Discriminant validity of well-being measures,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3): 616-628

Lucas, R., Clark, A., Georgellis, Y., and Diener, E. (2004). “Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction,” Psychological Science, 15(1): 8-13

Mäler, K.-G. (1974). Environmental economics: A theoretical inquiry, Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future

Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, R., and Sandvik, E. (1991). “Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: Evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 57(1): 149-161

Peters, E., Slovic, P., and Gregory, R. (2003). “The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(4): 309-330

Plott, C. and Zeiler, K. (2005). “The willingness to pay – willingness to accept gap, the ‘endowment effect’, subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations” American Economic Review, 95(3): 530-545

Randall, A. and Stoll, J. (1980). “Consumer’s surplus in commodity space,” American Economic Review, 70(3): 449-455

Redelmeier, D. and Kahneman, D. (1996). “Patients’ memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures,” Pain, 66(1), 3-8

Sandvik, E., Diener, E., and Seidlitz, L. (1993). “Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures,” Journal of Personality, 61(3): 317-342

Schkade, D. and Kahneman, D. (1998). “Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments in life satisfaction,” Psychological Science, 9(5): 340-346

Shogren, J., Shin, S., Hayes, D., and Kliebenstein, J. (1991). “Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept,” American Economic Review, 84(1): 255-279

Thaler, R. (1980). “Toward a positive theory of consumer choice,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1): 39-60

Thaler, R. (1999). “Mental accounting matters,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3): 183-206

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases,” Science, 185(4157): 1124-1131

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991). “Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4): 1039-1061

Urry, H., Nitschke, J. Dolski, I., Jackson, D., Dalton, K., Mueller, C., Rosenkranz, M., Ryff, C., Singer, B., and Davidson, R. (2004). “Making a life worth living: Neural correlates of well-being,” Psychological Science, 15(6): 367-372

Vickrey, W. (1961). “Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders,” Journal of Finance. 16(1): 8-37

Watson, D., Clark, L. and Tellegen, A. (1988). “Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6): 1063-1070

Welsch, H. (2002). “The preferences over prosperity and pollution: Environmental valuation based on happiness surveys,” Kyklos, 55(4): 473-494

Welsch, H. and Kühling, J. (2010). “Using happiness data for environmental valuation: issues and applications,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(2): 385-406

Willig, R. (1976). “Consumer’s surplus without apology,” American Economic Review, 66(4): 589-597