Drakopoulos, Stavros A. and Katselidis, Ioannis (2012): The Development of Trade Union theory and Mainstream Economic Methodology.
Download (137kB) | Preview
The pre-war approaches to trade unions were mainly based on the theoretical and methodological viewpoints of early institutional economics. Trade unions were conceived of as politico-economic organizations whose members were motivated by relative comparisons and also were concerned with issues of equity and justice. In the post-war period, there was a major theoretical and methodological shift towards the idea of unions as optimizing economic units with well-defined objective functions which are optimized subject to purely economic constraints. This conceptual transformation took place mainly through the Dunlop-Ross debate, in which John Dunlop conceived unions as analogous to business firms, which was contrary to Arthur Ross’ institutional and political approach. The emerging post war mainstream methodological framework with its mathematical formalism and the exclusion of sociological, political and psychological elements from economic analysis was the main reason for the prevalence of Dunlop’s ideas. However, after decades of analytical developments, the current state of trade union theory has not produced very impressive theoretical results.The paper traces the historical development of the economic analysis of the trade unions from a methodological perspective. It examines the methodological reasons for the dominance of Dunlop’s approach and also the current state of, and the contemporary criticism towards, the established theory. Furthermore, it discusses the contemporary efforts to build a more comprehensive approach to trade union theory and to trade union objectives, also incorporating Ross’ institutional and political insights.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The Development of Trade Union theory and Mainstream Economic Methodology|
|Keywords:||Trade Union Theory; Economic Methodology|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General
J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J50 - General
|Depositing User:||Stavros A. Drakopoulos|
|Date Deposited:||05. Jun 2012 15:07|
|Last Modified:||24. Apr 2015 06:04|
Addison, J. and Chilton, J. 1997. “Models of Union Behavior.” In David Lewin, Daniel Mitchell, and Mahmood Zaidi (eds.), The Human Resource Management Handbook, Part II, pp. 157–96.
Ashenfelter, O. C. & Johnson, G. E. 1969. “Bargaining Theory, Trade Unions and Industrial Strike Activity.” American Economic Review 59: 35-49.
Arrow, K. J. 1950. “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare.” The Journal of Political Economy 58 (4) (August): 328-346.
Atherton, W. 1973. Theory of Union Bargaining Goals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Backhouse, R. 1994. “The Lakatosian Legacy in Economic Methodology”, in R. Backhouse (ed) New Directions in Economic Methodology, London: Routledge, 173-191.
Berg, N. 2006. “Behavioral Labor Economics” in Altman, M (ed) Handbook of Contemporary Behavioral Economics, New York: M.E. Sharpe, 457-478.
Berkowitz, M. 1954. “The Economics of Trade Union Organization and Administration.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 7 (4): 575–92.
Binmore, K., A. Rubinstein, and A. Wolinsky. 1986. “The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic Modelling.” Rand Journal of Economics 17: 176–188.
Binmore, K., and P. Dasgupta. 1987. The Economics of Bargaining. Oxford: Blackwell.
Black, D. 1948. “On the Rationale of Group Decision-making.” Journal of Political Economy 56: 23–34.
Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Booth, A. 1984. “A Public Choice Model of Trade Union Behavior and Membership.” Economic Journal 94 (December): 883–98.
Booth, A. 1985. “The Free Rider Problem and a Social Custom Model of Trade Union Membership.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100(February): 253–61.
Booth, A. 1995. The Economics of the Trade Union. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Borland, J. 1986. “The Ross-Dunlop Debate Revisited.” Journal of Labor Research 7 (Summer): 293–308.
Boyer, G. and Smith, R. 2001. “The Development of the Neoclassical Tradition in Labor Economics.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54, (2): 199-223.
Bruni, L. and Sugden, R. 2007. “The road not taken: how psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back.” The Economic Journal 117: 146-173.
Caldwell, B. 1982. Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, London: Allen and Unwin.
Calvo, G. 1978. “Urban unemployment and wage determination in LDCs: Trade unions in the Harris-Todaro model.” International Economic Review 19: 65-81.
Cartter, A. 1959. Theory of Wages and Employment. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Clark, A. and Oswald, A. 1998. “Comparison-Concave Utility and Following Behaviour in Social and Economic Settings.” Journal of Public Economics 70:133-55.
De la Croix, D. 1994. “Wage Interdependence Through Decentralized Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Surveys 8(4): 371–403.
De Menil, G. 1971. Bargaining: Monopoly Power versus Union Power. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Denny, K. and Nickell, J. 1992. “Unions and investment in British Industry.” Economic Journal 102: 847-887.
Dertouzos, J., and J. Pencavel. 1981. “Wage and Employment Determination under Trade Unionism: The International Typographical Union.” Journal of Political Economy 89(6): 1162-81.
Dow, S. 2002. Economic Methodology: An Inquiry, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Drakopoulos, S. 1994. “Some Implications of the New Physics for Economic Methodology.” South African Journal of Economics 62 (4): 198-209.
Drakopoulos, S. 2011. “The Neglect of Comparison Income: an Historical Perspective.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18 (3): 441-464.
Dunlop, J. 1944. Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: Macmillan.
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1881. Mathematical Psychics. London: E. Kegan Paul.
Ely, R. T. 1890. “A Programme for Labor Reform.” The Century; a popular quarterly 39(6) (April): 938-952.
Faith, R. and J. Reid. 1983. “The Labor Union as Its Members’ Agent.” In Joseph Reid (ed.), New Approaches to Labor Unions, Suppl. 2, pp. 3–25 of Ronald Ehrenberg (ed.), Research in Labor Economics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Farber, H. 1978. “Individual Preferences and Union Wage Determination: The Case of the United Mine Workers.” Journal of Political Economy 68 (October): 923–42.
Farber, H. 1986. “The Analysis of Union Behavior.” In Orley Ashenfelter and Richard Layard (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 2, pp. 1039–89. New York: North-Holland.
Fellner, W. 1949. Competition Among the Few. New York: Knopf.
Fleetwood, S. 1999. “The Inadequacy of Mainstream Theories of Trade Union Behavior.” Labour 13(2): 445–80.
Freeman, R. and Medoff, J. 1984. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.
Friedman, M. 1953. “The Methodology of Positive Economics”, in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Furubotn, E. and Richter, R. 1997. Institutions and Economic Theory, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Hicks, J. 1932. The Theory of Wages. New York: Macmillan.
Hieser, R. 1970: “Wage determination with bilateral monopoly in the labour market: A theoretical treatment.” Economic Record 31: 55-72.
Howson, S. 2004. “The Origins of Lionel Robbins’s Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science.” History of Political Economy 36: 413-443.
Hutchison, T. 1938. The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. London: Macmillan.
Inman, R. 1987. “Markets, Governments, and the ‘New’ Political Economy”, in Alan Auerbach and Martin Feldstein (eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, pp. 647–777. New York: North Holland.
Jevons, S. W. 1882. The State in Relation to Labour. London: Macmillan.
Johnston, J. 1972. “A Model of Wage Determination under Bilateral Monopoly.” Economic Journal 82: 837-852.
Kaufman, B. E. 1999. “Expanding the Behavioral Foundations of Labor Economics”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52(3): 361-92.
Kaufman, B. E. 2000. “The Early Institutionalists on Industrial Democracy and Union Democracy.” Journal of Labor Research 21 (2) (Spring): 189-209.
Kaufman, B. E. 2002. “Models of Union Wage Determination: What Have We Learned Since Dunlop and Ross?” Industrial Relations 41 (1) (January): 110-158.
Kaufman, B. E. and Levine, D. 2000. “An Economic Analysis of Employee Representation.” In Bruce Kaufman and Daphne Taras (eds.), Nonunion Employee Representation: History, Contemporary Practice and Policy. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Kidd, D. and A. Oswald. 1987. “A Dynamic Model of Trade Union Behavior.” Economica 54 (August): 355–588.
Leontieff, W. 1946. “The Pure Theory of the Guaranteed Annual Wage Contract.” Journal of Political Economy 54 (February): 76–9.
Manning, A. 1994. “How Robust Is the Microeconomic Theory of the Trade Union?” Journal of Labor Economics 12 (July):430–59.
Manzini, P. 1998. “Game Theoretic Models of Wage Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Surveys 12(February): 1–41.
McDonald, I. and R. Solow. 1981. “Wage Bargaining and Employment.” American Economic Review 71(December): 896–908.
McNulty, P. J. 1980. The Origins and Development of Labor Economics: A Chapter in the History of Social Thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Mirowski, P. 1989. More Heat than Light, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, D. 1972. “Union Wage Policies: The Ross-Dunlop Debate Reopened.” Industrial Relations 11 (Winter): 46–61.
Nickell, S. and M. Andrews. 1983. “Unions, Real Wages and Employment in Britain 1951–79.” Oxford Economic Papers 35 (November, Suppl.): 183–206.
Oswald, A. 1982. “The Microeconomic Theory of the Trade Union.” Economic Journal 92(September): 576–95.
Oswald, A. 1985. “The Economic Theory of Trade Unions: An Introductory Survey.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 87: 167–93.
Pemberton, J. 1988. “A Managerial Model of the Trade Union.” Economic Journal 98 (September):755–71.
Pencavel, J. 1984. “The Trade-Off Between Wages and Employment in Trade Union Objectives.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 99(2): 215–31.
Pencavel, J. 1991. Labor Markets and Trade Unionism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Perlman, M. 1960. “Labor Movement Theories: Past, Present, and Future.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 13 (April): 338-348.
Redman, D. 1993. Economics and the Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rees, A. 1976. “H. Gregg Lewis and the Development of Analytical Labor Economics”. The Journal of Political Economy 84 (4) Part 2: Essays in Labor Economics in Honor of H. Gregg Lewis. (August): S3-S8.
Rees, A. 1993. “The Role of Fairness in Wage Determination.” Journal of Labor Economics 11(January, part 1):243–52.
Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.
Rosen, S. 1969. “Trade union power, threat effects, and the extent of organization.” Review of Economic Studies 36: 185-196.
Ross, A. 1947. “The Trade Union as a Wage-fixing Institution”. The American Economic Review 37(4) (September): 566-588.
Ross, A. 1948. Trade Union Wage Policy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rubinstein, A. 1982. “Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model.” Econometrica 50(1): 97–109.
Seligman, B. 1969. “The Impact of Positivism on Economic Thought”, History of Political Economy 1: 256-78.
Skott, P. 2005. “Fairness as a Source of Hysterisis in Employment of Relative Wages.” Journal of Economic and Behavioral Organization, 57: 305-31.
Solow, R. 1990. The Labor Market as a Social Institution, New York: Blackwell.
Ulph, A. and Ulph, D. 1990. “Union Bargaining: a Survey of Recent Work” in Sapsford, D. and Tzannatos, Z. (eds) Current Issues in Labor Economics, London: Macmillan.
Webb, S. and B. Webb 1897. Industrial Democracy. London: Longmans, Green.
Wisman, J. 1978. “The Naturalist Turn of Orthodox Economics: A Study of Methodological Misunderstanding.” Review of Social Economy 36: 263–284.
Zeuthen, F. 1930. Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warfare. London: Routledge.