Sharma, Chanchal Kumar (2007): Rescuing the concept of vertical fiscal imbalance.
Download (229kB) | Preview
This article restores the concept of vertical fiscal imbalance (VFI) to its original meaning. The literature shows that there is neither a universally accepted definition of VFI nor a commonly accepted approach to measuring it. Estimates of VFI are derived, much like accounting or deficit measurements, by comparing the revenues and expenditures of two levels of government. VFI is, however, too nuanced an issue to be described by this kind of national accounting procedure. We argue that ease of measurement should always take second place to the appropriateness of the economic concepts used; it makes no sense to adopt a definition that is convenient for measurement if it does not have a sound theoretical basis. The conventional definition of VFI however, falls into this trap, and the ad hoc definition was adopted for its expedience. This measure does not reflect whether taxes and expenditures across the various levels of government are too high, too low or about right. Unfortunately, the sacrifice of rigour for tractability has seriously harmed the quality of public policy debate on the issue.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Rescuing the concept of vertical fiscal imbalance|
|English Title:||Rescuing the Concept of Vertical Fiscal Imbalance|
|Keywords:||iscal federalism; intergovernmental relations; vertical fiscal imbalance; vertical fiscal gap;|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession
P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P43 - Public Economics ; Financial Economics
P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P35 - Public Economics
H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations
|Depositing User:||Chanchal Kumar Sharma|
|Date Deposited:||09. Jun 2012 18:17|
|Last Modified:||07. Sep 2015 17:53|
Ahmad E. 1997. Financing Decentralized Expenditures—An International Comparison of Grants. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishers.
Ahmad E. and J. Craig. 1997. ‘Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers’, in T. Ter-Minassian (ed.), Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: IMF, pp.74-76.
Baldwin, R. and P. Krugman. 2000. ‘Agglomeration, Integration, and Tax Harmonization’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2630, November. Besfamille, M. and Lockwood, B. 2008. ‘Bailouts In Federations: Is a Hard Budget Constraint Always Best ?’, International Economic Review, 49, 2, 577-593.
Birch, A. H. 1955. Federalism, Finance, and Social Legislation in Canada, Australia, and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon University Press.
Bird, R. M. 1976. Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
Bird, R. M. 2000. ‘Rethinking Subnational Taxes: A New Look at Tax Assignment’, Tax Notes International, 20, 19, 2069-96. Bird, R. M. 2003. ‘Fiscal Flows, Fiscal Balance, and Fiscal Sustainability’, Working Paper 03-02, Atlanta: Georgia State University.
Bird, R. M. and A. V. Tarasov. 2004. ‘Closing the Gap: Fiscal Imbalances and Intergovernmental Transfers in Developed Federations’, Environment and Policy C: Government and Policy, 22, 1, 77-102.
Boadway, R. 1998. ‘The Economics of Equalization: An Overview’, in R. Boadway and P. Hobson (eds), Equalization: Its Contribution to Canada’s Economic and Fiscal Progress. Kingston: John Deutsch Institute, pp. 27-82.
Boadway, R. 2000. ‘Recent Developments in the Economics of Federalism’, in Harvey Lazar (ed.), Canada: The State of the Federation 1999-2000: Toward a New Mission Statement for Canadian Fiscal Federalism. Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, pp. 41-78.
Boadway, R. 2004 a. ‘Should the Canadian Federation be rebalanced?’, Queen’s University Working Paper (04/1) Kingston: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations. Boadway, R. 2004 b. ‘The Theory and Practice of Equalization’, CESifo Economic Studies, 50, 1, 211-54.
Boadway, R. 2005. ‘The Vertical Fiscal Gap: Conceptions and Misconceptions’, in Harvey Lazar (ed.), Canadian Fiscal Arrangements: What Works, What Might Work Better. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press, pp. 51–80.
Boadway, R. 2007. ‘Grants in a Federal Economy: A Conceptual Perspective’, in R. Boadway and A. Shah (eds), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 55-74.
Boadway, R. and F. Flatters. 1982. Equalization in a Federal State: An Economic Analysis. Ottawa: Economic Council of Canada.
Boadway, R. and P. Hobson. 1993. Intergovernmental Finance in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation. Boadway, R. and A. Shah (eds). 2007. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers. Washington DC: World Bank. Boadway, R. and J. Tremblay. 2006. ‘A Theory of Fiscal Imbalance’, FinanzArchiv, 62, 1, 1–27.
Brake, G. 1967. Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations in the United States. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Brennan, G. and J. Buchanan. 1980. The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution. Cambridge: CUP.
Breton, A. 1998. Competitive Governments: An Economic Theory of Politics and Public Finance. New York: Cambridge University Press. Buchanan, J. M. 1950. ‘Federalism and Fiscal Equity,’ American Economic Review, 40, 4, 583-599.
Buchanan, J. M., and R. A. Musgrave. 1999. Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Bucovetsky, S. and M. Smart. 2006. ‘The Efficiency Consequences of Local Revenue Equalization: Tax Competition and Tax Distortions’, Journal of Public Economic Theory 8, 1, 119-144.
Burns, R. M. 1980. The Acceptable Mean: The Tax Rental Agreements, 1941-62. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.
Cai, H. and D. Triesman. 2004. ‘State Corroding Federalism’, Journal of Public Economics, 88, 3-4, 819-43. Chelliah, R. J. 2010. Political Economy of Poverty Reduction in India. New Delhi: Sage.
Collins, D. J. 2002. ‘The 2000 Reform of Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements in Australia’, in International Symposium on Fiscal Imbalance: A Report. Canada: Commission on Fiscal Imbalance, pp 113-44.
Courchene, T. J. 2006. ‘Variations on the Federalism Theme’, Policy Options, 27, 7, 46-54.
Dahlby, B. 2005. Dealing with the Fiscal Imbalances: Vertical, Horizontal and Structural. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
Dahlby, B. 2009. ‘The Optimal Taxation Approach to Intergovernmental Grants’, Working Paper No. 2009-16, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
Dahlby, B. and L.S. Wilson. 1994. ‘Fiscal Capacity, Tax Effort, and Optimal Equalization Grants’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, 3, 657-72.
Dahlby, B., J. Rodden, and S. Wilson. 2009. ‘A Median Voter Model of the Vertical Fiscal Gap’, Working Paper No. 2009-14, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
Diaz-Cayeros, A. 2006. Federalism, Fiscal Authority, and Centralization in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Dillinger, W., and S. Webb. 2001. Fiscal Management in Federal Democracies: Argentina and Brazil. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Duff, D. G. 2004. ‘Benefit Taxes and User Fees in Theory and Practice’, University of Toronto Law Journal, 54, 4, 391-447.
Ebel, R. D. and S. Yilmaz. 2002. ‘Concept of Fiscal Decentralization and Worldwide Overview’, in International Symposium on Fiscal Imbalance: A Report. Canada: Commission on Fiscal Imbalance, pp.145-74.
Fisher, R. C. 1982. ‘Income and Grant Effects on Local Expenditure: The Flypaper Effect and Other Difficulties’, Journal of Urban Economics, 12, 3, 324-45.
Gibson, E. and E. Calvo. 2000. ‘Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 35, 3, 32-55.
Gramlich, E. M. 1977. ‘Intergovernmental Grants: A Review of the Empirical Literature’, Wallace E. Oates (ed.), The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, pp. 219-39.
Grewal, B. 1995. ‘Vertical Fiscal Imbalance in Australia: A Problem for Tax Structure, not for Revenue Sharing’, Working Paper. Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University.
Gruber, J., and E. Saez. 2002. ‘The Elasticity of Taxable Income: Evidence and Implications’, Journal of Public Economics 84, 1, 1–32.
Hadiz, V. R. 2004. ‘Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives’, Development and Change, 35, 6, 697–718.
Hallwood, P. and R. MacDonald. 2005. ‘The Economic Case for Fiscal Federalism’, in B. Ashcroft, D. Coyle and W. Alexander (eds), New Wealth for Old Nations. Princeton (NJ) USA: Princeton University Press, pp. 96-116.
Hartle, D. G. 1971. ‘The impact of new tax policies on national unity’, in Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, In Search of Balance— Canada’s Intergovernmental experience. Washington DC.
Hettich, W. and S. Winer. 1986. ‘Vertical Imbalance in the Fiscal Systems of Federal States’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 19, 4, 745-65.
Hunter, J.S.H. 1974. ‘Vertical Intergovernmental Financial Imbalance: A Framework for Evaluation’, Finanzarchiv, 2, 481-92.
Hunter, J.S.H. 1977. Federalism and Fiscal Balance. Canberra: ANU Press.
James, D. 1997. ‘Commonwealth Assistance to the States Since 1976’, Background Paper No. 5, 1997-98, 20 October. Australia: Department of the Parliamentary Library.
Janeba, E. and G. Schjelerup. 2002. ‘Why Europe Should Love Tax Competition - And the U.S. Even More So’, NBER Working Paper No. 9334, November.
Joumard, I. and M. Kongsrud. 2003. ‘Fiscal Relations across Government Levels’, OECD Economic Studies, 36, 1, 155-228.
Keen, M. 1998. ‘Vertical Tax Externalities in the Theory of Fiscal Federalism’, IMF Staff Papers, 45, 3, 454-85.
Khemani, S. 2006. ‘Can Delegation Promote Fiscal Discipline in a Federation? Evidence from Fiscal Performance in the Indian States’, Conference Background Paper. Columbia University: Initiative for Policy Dialogue.
Kincaid, J. 1990 . ‘From Cooperative to Coercive Federalism’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 509, 1, 139 – 52.
King, D. 1984. Fiscal Tiers: The Economics of Multilevel Government. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Köthenbürger, M. 2005. ‘Leviathans, Federal transfers, and the Cartelization Hypothesis’, Public Choice, 122, 3, 449-65.
Krogstrup, S. 2002. ‘What do Theories of Tax Competition Predict for Capital Taxes in EU Countries? A Review of the Tax Competition Literature’, HEI Working Paper No. 05/2002, May.
Lazar, H., F. St-Hilaire and J.F.Tremblay. 2004. ‘Vertical Fiscal Imbalance: Myth or Reality’, in H. Lazar and F. St-Hilaire (eds), Money, Politics and Health Care: Reconstructing the Federal-Provincial Partnership. Montreal & Kingston: McGill Queens University Press, pp. 135-87.
Lee, M. 2006. ‘Tax Cuts and the Fiscal Imbalance.’ Vancouver: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives BC Office.
Lewis B. 2002. ‘Indonesia’, in P. Smoke and Y. Kim (eds), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Asia: Current Practice and Challenges for the Future. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 138-44.
Lockwood, B. 1999. ‘Inter-Regional Insurance’, Journal of Public Economics, 72, 1, 1–37.
Lockwood, B. 2001. ‘Tax Competition and Tax Co-ordination under Destination and Origin Principles: A Synthesis’, Journal of Public Economics, 81, 2, 279–319.
Martinez-Vazquez, J. 2008. ‘Revenue Assignments in the Practice of Fiscal Decentralization’, in N. Bosch and J. M. Duran (eds), Fiscal Federalism and Political Decentralization: Lessons from Spain, Germany, and Canada. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 27-55.
Mathews, R. 1980. Regional Disparities and Fiscal Equalisation in Australia. Canberra: ANU Press.
Matier, C., L. Wu and H. Jackson. 2001. ‘Analysing Vertical Fiscal Imbalance in a Framework of Fiscal Sustainability’, Working Paper (01/23). Ottawa: Department of Finance.
McLean, I. 2004. ‘Fiscal Federalism in Australia’, Public Administration: An International Quarterly, 82, 1, 21-38.
McLure, C. E. 1967. ‘The Interstate Exporting of State and Local Taxes: Estimates for 1962’, National Tax Journal, 20, 2, 49-77.
McLure, C. E. 1994. ‘The Tax Assignment Problem: Ends, Means, and Constraints’, Australian Tax Forum, 11, 2, 153-83.
McLure, C. E. 1998. ‘The Revenue Assignment Problem: Ends, Means, and Constraints’, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 9, 4, 652-83.
McLure, C. E. 2001. ‘The Tax Assignment Problem: Ruminations on How Theory and Practice Depend on History’, National Tax Journal , 54, 2, 339-64.
Mintz, J., and M. Smart. 2004. ‘Income Shifting, Investment, and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence from Provincial Taxation’, Journal of Public Economics 88, 6, 1149–68.
Mitin, D. 2009. ‘The Clash of Perspectives? The EU and Russian Views on Federalism’, Cross-cultural Communication, 5, 4, 1-9. Mitra, S. 1999. ‘Speedbrakers Ahead’, India Today 24 (February): p. 45.
Montero, A. 2001. ‘Decentralizing democracy: Spain and Brazil in comparative perspective’, Comparative Politics, 33, 2, 149-169.
Muddipi, S. 1991. Finance Commissions and Center State Financial Relations. Allahabad: Chugh Publications.
Musgrave, R. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Myers, G. 1990. ‘Optimality, Free Mobility and the Regional Authority in a Federation’, Journal of Public Economics, 43, 1, 127-41.
Nice, D.C. 1987. Federalism: The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations. New York: St Martin’s Press. Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
Oates, W. E . 1993. ‘Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development’, National Tax Journal, 46, 2, 237-43.
Osterkamp, R. and M. Eller. 2003. ‘How Decentralized is Government Activity?’, CESifo DICE Report- Journal for Institutional Comparisons, 1,1, 32-35.
Persson, J. and G. Tabellini. 1996. ‘Federal Fiscal Constitutions: Risk-sharing and Redistribution’, Journal of Political Economy, 104, 5, 979-1009.
Pisauro, G. 2001. ‘Intergovernmental Relations and Fiscal Discipline: Between Commons and Soft budget Constraint’, IMF Working Paper No. 1/65. Washington: IMF.
Prud’homme, R. 1995. ‘On the Dangers of Decentralization’, World Bank Research Observer, 10, 2, 201-20.
Rao, M. G. and N. Singh. 2002. ‘The Political Economy of Center-State Fiscal Transfers in India’, in John McLaren (ed.), Institutional Elements of Tax Design and Reform. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 69-123.
Riker, W. 1975. ‘Federalism’, in F. Greenstein and N. Polsby (eds), Handbook of Political Science (Volume 5). Reading (Ma.): Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Rodden, J. and E. Wibbels. 2002. ‘Beyond the Fiction of Federalism: Macroeconomic Management in Multi-tiered Systems’, World Politics, 54, 4, 494-531.
Rodden, J., G. Eskeland, and J. Litvack. 2003. Fiscal Decentralization and the Challenge of Hard Budget Constraints. Cambridge Massachusetts :The MIT Press.
Ruggeri, G. C. and R. Howard. 2001. ‘On the Concept and Measurement of Vertical Fiscal Imbalances’, SIPP Public Policy Paper No. 6. Canada: University of Regina.
Ruggeri, G. C., D. Van Wart, G. K. Robertson, and R. Howard. 1993. ‘Vertical Fiscal Imbalance and Reallocation of Tax Fields in Canada’, Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 19, 2, 194-215.
Scharpf, F. W. 1995. ‘Federal Arrangements and Multi-Party Systems’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 30, 1, 27-39.
Schmidt, V. 2006. ‘Adapting to Europe: Is It harder for Britain?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 8, 1, 15-33.
Schroeder, L. and P. Smoke. 2002. ‘Intergovernmental Transfers in Developing Countries: Concepts, International Practices and Policy Issues’, in P. Smoke and Y.H. Kim (eds), Intergovernmental Transfers in Asia: Current Practice and Challenges for the Future. Manila: Asian Development Bank, pp. 20-59.
Seguin Commission (Commission on Fiscal Imbalance). 2002. A New Division of Canada’s Financial Resources. Québec: Government of Québec.
Seligman, E. R. A. 1931. Essays in Taxation. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.
Shah, A. 2006. ‘Lessons from International Practices of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers,’ Paper presented at the International Conference on Fiscal Decentralization, Islamabad, Pakistan, May 3-4.
Shah, A. 2007. ‘A Practitioner’s Guide to Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers’, in Robin Boadway and Anwar Shah (eds), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 1-51.
Sharma, C. K. 2009. ‘Emerging Dimensions of Decentralization Debate in the Age of Globalization’, Indian Journal of Federal Studies, 19, 1, 47-65.
Sharma, C.K. 2011. ‘Multilevel Fiscal Governance in a Balanced Policy Environment', The India Economy Review, 8, 1, 90–7.
Simons, H. C. 1938. Personal Income Taxation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Simeon, R. 1998. ‘Considerations on the Design of Federations: the South African Constitution in Comparative Perspective’, Working Paper (2), Canada: Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Queen’s University.
Singh, R. and A. Plekhanov. 2006. ‘How Should Subnational Government Borrowing Be Regulated? Some Cross-Country Empirical Evidence’, IMF Staff Papers, 53, 3, 426-53.
Smart, M. 2005. ‘Federal Transfers: Principles, Practice and Prospects’, Working paper, Canada: C. D. Howe Institute. Taliercio, R. 2005. ‘Subnational Own-Source Revenue: Getting Policy and Administration Right’ in World Bank (ed.), East Asia Decentralizes: Making Local Governments Work. Washington DC: World Bank. pp. 107-28.
Tanzi, V. 1996. ‘Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization : A Review of Some Efficiency and Macro Economic Issues’, in Proceedings of the World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1995. Washington DC: World Bank, pp. 215-316.
The Federal Department of Finance. 2002. The Fiscal Balance in Canada: The Facts. Ottawa: Department of Finance, Canada. Tiebout, C. 1956. ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, 64, 5, 416-24.
Treisman, D. 1999. After the Deluge: Regional Crises and Political Consolidation in Russia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1986. ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, in J. Elster (ed.), Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press, pp. 123-41.
Uhr, J. 1989. ‘The Canadian and Australian Senates: Comparing Federal Political Institutions’, in B. W. Hodgins, D. Wright and W. H. Heick. (eds), Federalism in Canada and Australia: The Early Years. Canberra: ANU Press, pp. 130-146.
von Hagen, J. 2007. ‘Achieving Economic Stabilization by Sharing Risk within Countries’, in R. Boadway and A. Shah (eds), Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: Principles and Practice. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 107–29.
Wagner, R. E. 1973. The Public Economy. Chicago: Markham Publishing Company.
Wagner, R. E. 1991. ‘Tax Norms, Fiscal Reality, and the Democratic State’, in R. E. Wagner (ed.), Charging for Government Services: User Charges and Earmarked Taxes in Principle and Practice. New York: Routledge.
Walsh, C. 1990. ‘State Taxation and Vertical Fiscal Imbalance - The Radical Reform Options’, in C. Walsh (ed.), Issues in State Taxation. Canberra: ANU Press, pp. 53-92. Walter, D. M. 2004. ‘The Nation’s Growing Fiscal Imbalance’, Presentation to CSIS Global Aging Forum (June 16). US Government Accountability Office.
Wanna J. and P. Weller. 2003. ‘Traditions of Australian governance’, Public Administration: An International Quarterly, 81, 1, 63-94.
Warren, N. 2006. ‘Benchmarking Australia’s Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements: Final Report’, available at www.treasury.nsw.gov.au.
Webb, R. 2002. ‘Public Finance and Vertical Fiscal Imbalance’, Research Note No. 13. Australia: Department of the Parliamentary Library. Weingast, B. R. 2006. ‘Second-Generation Fiscal Federalism: Implications for Decentralized Democratic Governance and Economic Development’, Hoover Institution Working Paper, June. Weingast, B. R., K. A. Shepsle, and C. Johnsen. 1981. ‘The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs; A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics’, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 4, 642-64.
Wellich, D. 2000. The Theory of Public Finance in a Federal State. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wheare, K. C. 1963. Federal Government (4th ed.) London: Oxford University Press.
Wildasin, D. 1997. Fiscal Aspects of Evolving Federations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, L. S. 1996. ‘Federal-State fiscal Arrangements in Malaysia’, International and Development Studies Working Papers, John Deutsch Institute for the Study of Economic Policy, Queen's University, Kingston.
Winer, S. L. and A. M. Maslove. 1996. ‘Fiscal Federalism in Australia and Canada: A Brief Comparison of Constitutional Frameworks, Structural Features of Existing Fiscal Systems and Fiscal Institutions’, in P. Boothe (ed.), Reforming Fiscal Federalism for Global Competition: A Canada-Australia Comparison. Canada: University of Alberta Press, pp. 45-86.