Westling, Tatu (2012): Managerial spans, industry tasks and ICT: evidence from the U.S.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39403.pdf Download (312kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The knowledge theoretic view of organization of production postulates that ICT, tasks and hierarchies intertwine. Utilizing Occupational Employment Statistics and O*NET data, this study investigates the proposition by exploiting the substantial cross-industry variation in hierarchical forms, which are here captured by spans of control among middle and corporate managers. Information [IT] and communication technologies [CT] are explored separately, and the parsimonious task taxonomy depicts industries in four dimensions: tacit knowledge, cognitive, physical/technical and interaction. The key predictions of the knowledge hierarchy literature can hence be tested and the findings largely reverberate with theory. First, ICT influences middle and corporate manager spans dissimilarly reflecting technological asymmetries in hierarchies. Higher IT utilization narrows organizations yet CT expands middle management. Second, industry tasks govern organizational outcomes. Cognitive tasks flatten and technical/physical tasks narrow hierarchies. Third, the descriptive evidence suggests that hierarchies are highly non-pyramidal across U.S. industries. Finally, the key insight is that spans in top hierarchy are insular to tasks yet organizations down the middle management reflect the nature of industry. With some exceptions the results are robust to exogenous variation in ICT utilization.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Managerial spans, industry tasks and ICT: evidence from the U.S. |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Organization; hierarchy; span of control; tasks; ICT; cross-industry |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L23 - Organization of Production J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure |
Item ID: | 39403 |
Depositing User: | Tatu Westling |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jun 2012 15:18 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 18:02 |
References: | D. Autor, et al. (2003). `The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4). N. Bloom, et al. (2009). The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization. No. 14975. National Bureau of Economic Research. E. Brynjolfsson, et al. (1994). `Does Information Technology Lead to Smaller Firms?'. Management Science 40(12). L. Caliendo, et al. (2012). `The Anatomy of French Production Hierarchies'. A. Chandler (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. The MIT Press. R. Coase (1937). `The Nature of the Firm'. Economica 4(16). M. Colombo & M. Delmastro (1999). `Some Stylized Facts on Organization and its Evolution'. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 40(3). M. Colombo & M. Delmastro (2004). `Delegation of Authority in Business Organizations: An Empirical Test'. Journal of Industrial Economics 52(1). R. Daft & R. Lengel (1986). `Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design'. Management Science 32(5). R. Daft, et al. (2010). Organization Theory and Design. Thomson Learning. L. Garicano (2000). `Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production'. Journal of Political Economy 108(5). L. Garicano & E. Rossi-Hansberg (2006). `Organization and Inequality in a Knowledge Economy'. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(4). D. Garvin & L. Levesque (2008). `The Multiunit Enterprise'. Harvard Business Review. J. Harris & C. Lentz (2006). New Growth from Enterprise Systems: How Consumer Packaged Goods and Retail Organizations Achieve High Performance through Distinctive Capabilities. Accenture Institute for High Performance Business. D. Hickson, et al. (1969). `Operations Technology and Organization Structure: An Empirical Reappraisal'. Administrative Science Quarterly 14(3). F. Hull & P. Collins (1987). `High-Technology Batch Production Systems: Woodward's Missing Type'. Academy of Management Journal 30(4). F. Knight (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Prot. Hart, Schaner & Marx. H. Leavitt & T. Whisler (1958). `Management in the 1980's'. Harvard Business Review . H. Mintzberg (1990). `The Manager's Job: Folklore and Fact'. Harvard Business Review 90(2). A. Pinsonneault & K. Kraemer (1997). `Middle Management Downsizing: an Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Information Technology'. Management Science 43(5). R. Radner (1993). `The Organization of Decentralized Information Processing'. Econometrica 61(5). R. Rajan & J. Wulf (2006). `The Flattening firm: Evidence from panel data on the changing nature of corporate hierarchies'. The Review of Economics and Statistics 4(88). V. Smeets & F. Warzynski (2008). `Too many theories, too few facts? What the data tell us about the link between span of control, compensation and career dynamics'. Labour Economics 15(4). D. Teece (1996). `Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation'. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 31(2). D. van Fleet & A. Bedeian (1977). `A History of the Span of Management'. Academy of Management Review 2(3). J. Woodward (1965). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press. Y. Yusuf, et al. (2004). `Enterprise Information Systems Project Implementation: A Case Study of ERP in Rolls-Royce'. International Journal of Production Economics 87(3). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39403 |