Cid, Alejandro (2012): Giving a Second Chance: an After-School Program in a Shanty Town Matched against Parent Type.
Download (123kB) | Preview
Most discussion of after-school programs in shanty towns has focused on estimating their average effects. The results of these programs are inconclusive and the explanation may be that the effects are heterogeneous. In this paper, we study the influence of how heterogeneity in the type of parents involved in the program affects the performance of their children at school. We measure performance at school according to academic achievement, behavior and grade retention. In line with previous literature, we employ the number of books at home as a proxy for parent type. By using random assignment to evaluate an after-school program in a developing-country shanty town, we find that it is effective in raising children’s school achievement for those with a committed parent type. Thus, this paper provides evidence that the knowledge of the distribution of effects is crucial to guiding public policy and it is not enough just to change the environment in which young people spend their after school hours, increasing time in safe, supervised settings, it is also necessary to take parenting type into account.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Giving a Second Chance: an After-School Program in a Shanty Town Matched against Parent Type|
|Keywords:||after-school; education; impact evaluation; randomized experiment|
|Subjects:||I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education|
|Depositing User:||Alejandro Cid|
|Date Deposited:||08. Jul 2012 07:24|
|Last Modified:||10. Sep 2015 14:42|
Aizer, A. (2004). Home Alone: Supervision after School and Child Behavior. Journal of Public Economics 88, 1835–1848.
Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and Identity. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715-753.
Apsler, R. (2009). After-School Programs for Adolescents: A Review of Evaluation Research. Adolescence, 44(173), 1-19.
Arbreton, A., Sheldon, J., Bradshaw, M., Goldsmith, J., Jucovy, L. and Pepper, S. (2008). Lessons Learned from the Coral Initiative. Findings from an Independent Evaluation of a major After-School Initiative. Public/Private Ventures.
Beets, M. W., Beighle, A., Erwin, H. E. and Huberty, J. L. (2009). After-School Program Impact on Physical Activity and Fitness. A Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 36(6), 527–537.
Bisin, A. and Verdier, T. (2010). The Economics of Cultural Transmission and Socialization. NBER Working Paper Series, N. 16512
Black, A. R., Somers, M., Doolittle, F., Unterman, R. and Grossman, J. B. (2009). The Evaluation of Enhanced Academic Instruction in After-School Programs: Final Report (NCEE 2009-4077). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Bodilly, S. and Beckett, M. K. (2005). Making Out-Of-School-Time Matter Evidence for an Action Agenda. RAND Education and RAND Labor and Population for The Wallace Foundation.
Dal Bó, E. and Rossi, M. (2011). Term Length and Effort of Politicians. Review of Economic Studies, 78(4), 1237-1263.
Dumais, S. A. (2009). Cultural Capital and Concerted Cultivation: the Relationship between Long-Term Participation in Activities and Educational Outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Hilton San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Aug 08, 2009
Durlak, J. A. and Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The Impact of After-School Programs that Promote Personal and Social Skills. CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning).
Dzewaltowski, D. A., Geller, K. S., Rosenkranz, R. P. and Karteroliotis, K. (2010). Children’s Self-Efficacy and Proxy Efficacy for After-School Physical Activity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11, 100–106.
Eble, A., Mann, V., Bhakta, P., Lakshminarayana, R., Frost, Ch., Elbourne, D. and Boone1, P. (2010). The Stripes Trial - Support to Rural India’s Public Education System. Trials, 11:10. Study Protocol.
Engels, H., Gretebeck, R. J., Gretebeck, K. A. and Jiménez, L. (2005). Promoting Healthful Diets and Exercise: Efficacy of a 12-Week After-School Program in Urban African Americans. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105, 455-459.
Fryer, R. G., Khan, L., Levitt, S. D. and Spenkuch, J. L. (2008). The Plight of Mixed Race Adolescents. Forthcoming in Review of Economics and Statistics.
Gottfredson, D., Cross, A., Wilson, D., Rorie, M. and Connell, N. (2010). Effects of Participation in After-School Programs for Middle School Students: a Randomized Trial Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 3(3), 282-313.
Gottfredson, D. C., Cross, A. and Soulé, D. A. (2007). Distinguishing Characteristics of Effective and Ineffective After-School Programs to Prevent Delinquency and Victimization. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(2), 289–318.
Gottfredson, D., Kumpfer, K., Polizzi-Fox, D., Wilson, D., Puryear, V., Beatty, P. and Vilmenay, M. (2005). The Strengthening Washington D.C. Families Project: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of Family-Based Prevention. Prevention Science, 7(1), 57-74.
Gottfredson, D. C., Gerstenblith, S. A., Soulé, D. A., Womer, S. C. and Lu, Sh. (2004). Do After School Programs Reduce Delinquency? Prevention Science, 5(4), 253-266.
Grolnick, W. S., Farkas, M. S., Sohmer, R., Michaels, S. and Valsiner, J. (2007). Facilitating Motivation in Young Adolescents: Effects of an After-School Program Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 332–344.
He, F., Linden, L. L. and MacLeod, M. (2009). A Better Way to Teach Children to Read? Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trail. Working paper, Columbia.
James-Burdumy, S., Dynarski, M. and Deke, J. (2008). After-School Program Effects on Behavior: Results from the 21st Century Community Learning Centres Program National Evaluation. Economic Inquiry, 46(1), 13–18.
Kling, J., Liebman, J., and Katz, L. (2007). Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects, Econometrica 75(1), 83-119.
Korat, O., Klein, P. and Segal-Drori, O. (2007). Maternal Mediation in Book Reading, Home Literacy Environment, and Children’s Emergent Literacy: a Comparison between Two Social Groups. Reading and Writing, 20(4), 361-398.
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. A., Snow, D. and Martin-Glenn, M. (2006). Out-Of-School-Time Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 275-313.
Liu, X. and Whitford, M. (2011). Opportunities-to-Learn at Home: Profiles of Students With and Without Reaching Science Proficiency. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 375-387.
Mahoney, J. L. and Zigler, E. F. (2006). Translating Science to Policy under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Lessons from the National Evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 282–294.
Ngorosho, D. (2011). Reading and Writing Ability in Relation to Home Environment: A Study in Primary Education in Rural Tanzania. Child Indicators Research, 4(3), 369-388. Ozkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J. and
Cakiroglu, E. (2011). Elementary Students’ Scientific Epistemological Beliefs in Relation to Socio-Economic Status and Gender. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 115-127.
Riggs, N. R. and Greenberg, M. T. (2004). After-School Youth Development Programs: a Developmental-Ecological Model of Current Research. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 7(3), 177-190.
Rorie, M., Gottfredson, D. C., Cross, A., Wilson, D. and Connell, N. M. (2010). Structure and Deviancy Training in After-School Programs. Journal of Adolescence. [web published ahead of print]
Tebes, J. K., Feinn, R., Vanderploeg, J. J., Chinman, M. J., Shepard, J., Brabham, T., Genovese, M. and Connell, Ch. (2007). Impact of a Positive Youth Development Program in Urban After-School Settings on the Prevention of Adolescent Substance Use. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 239–247.
Turmo, A., Guttersrud, O., Elstad, E. and Vegar Olsen, R. (2009). The Impact of Attending After-School Care Schemes on Science Achievement in Primary School: A Norwegian Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 48, 331–341.
Weisman, S. A., Soulé, S. A., Gottfredson, D. C., Lu, Sh., Kellstrom, M. A., Womer, Sh. C. and Bryner, S. L. (2003). After-School Programs, Antisocial Behavior, and Positive Youth Development: An Exploration of the Relationship between Program Implementation and Changes in Youth Behavior. University of Maryland (College Park, Md.). Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice
Zief, S. G., Lauver, S. and Maynard, R. A. (2006). The Impacts of After-School Programs on Student Outcomes. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2006:3
Zimmer, R., Hamilton, L. and Christina, R. (2010). After-School Tutoring in the Context of No Child Left Behind: Effectiveness of Two Programs in the Pittsburgh Public Schools. Economics of Education Review, 29, 18–28.