Halkos, George (2012): The impact of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation.
Download (313kB) | Preview
This paper examines the impact of government spending on the environment using a panel of 77 countries for the time period 1980-2000. We estimate both the direct effect of government spending on pollution and the indirect effect which operates through government spending impact on per capita income and the subsequent effect of income level on pollution. In order to take into account the dynamic nature of the relationships examined, appropriate econometric methods are used. For both sulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, government spending is estimated to have a negative direct impact on per capita emissions. The indirect effect on sulfur dioxide is found to be negative for low levels of income and then becomes positive as income level increases, while it remains negative for carbon dioxide for the whole income range of the sample. The resultant total effects follow the patterns of the indirect effects, which dominate their respective direct ones for each pollutant. Policy implications, occurring from the paper’s results, range according to the level of income of the considered countries.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The impact of government expenditure on the environment: An empirical investigation|
|Keywords:||Government expenditure; environment; direct and indirect effects|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E60 - General
|Depositing User:||G.E. Halkos|
|Date Deposited:||09. Jul 2012 12:23|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 08:00|
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.A., Yared, P., 2008, Income and Democracy. American Economic Review 98 (3), 808-842.
Afonso, A., Furceri, D., 2008. Government size composition, volatility and economic growth. European Central Bank Working Paper Series no. 849. (January)
Afonso, A., Jalles, J.T., 2011. Economic performance and government size. European Central Bank Working Paper Series no. 1399. (November).
Aidt, T.S., Dutta, J., Loukoianova, E., 2006. Democracy comes to Europe: Franchise extension and fiscal outcomes 1830-1938. European Economic Review 50 (2), 249-283.
Alan Heston, Robert Summers and Bettina Aten, Penn World Table Version 6.3, 2009. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
Arellano, M., Bond, S., 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297.
Arellano, M., Bond, S., 1998. Dynamic Panel Data estimation using DPD98 for GAUSS, Mimeo. Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.
Bajo-Rubio, O., 2000. A further generalization of the Solow growth model: the role of the public sector. Economic Letters 68, 79-84.
Barro, R.J., 1991. Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2), 407-443.
Barro, R.J., 1996. Democracy and Growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1 (1), 1-27.
Barro, R.J, 1998. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study. First ed., vol. 1, no. 0262522543, MIT Press Books, The MIT Press.
Bergh, A., Karlsson, M., 2010. Government size and growth: Accounting for economic freedom and globalization. Public Choice 142 (1), 195-213.
Bernauer, T., Koubi, V., 2006. States as Providers of Public Goods: How Does Government Size Affect Environmental Quality?. Available at SSRN, http://ssrn.com/abstract=900487
Blackburne III, E.F., Frank, M.W., 2007. Estimation of nonstationary heterogeneous panels. Stata Journal 7 (2), 197-208.
Boden, T.A., G. Marland, and R.J. Andres. 2009. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. doi 10.3334/CDIAC/00001.
Boix, C., 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Breitung, J., 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data, in: Baltagi, B.H., Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels, Advances in Econometrics 15, 161-178.
Breitung, J., Das, S., 2005. Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica 59 (4), 414-433.
Cole, M.A., 2007. Corruption, income and the environment: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics 62, 637-647.
Folster, S., Henrekson, M., 2001. Growth effects of government expenditure and taxation in rich countries. European Economic Review 45, 1501-1520.
Frederik, C., Lundström, S., 2001. Political and Economic Freedom and the Environment: The Case of CO2 Emissions. Working Paper in Economics no. 29. University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
Fullerton, D., Leicester, A., Smith S., 2010. Environmental Taxes, in: Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) (EDS.), Dimension of Tax Design. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 428-521.
Ghali, K.H., 1998. Government size and economic growth: evidence from a multivariate cointegration analysis. Applied Economics 31, 975-987.
Hadri, K., 2000. Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data. Econometrics Journal 3 (2), 148-161.
Halkos, G., 1995. An evaluation of the direct cost of abatement under the main desulfurization technologies. Energy Sources 17, 391-412.
Halkos, G., 2003. Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur: evidence using GMM estimation and random coefficient panel data models. Environment and Development Economics 8, 581-601.
Harris, R.D.F., Tzavalis, E., 1999. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics 91 (2), 201-226. Heyes, A., 2000. A proposal for the greening of textbook macro: ‘IS-LM-EE’. Ecological Economics 32, 1-7.
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115 (1), 53-74.
Lawn, P.A., 2003. Environmental Macroeconomics: Extending the IS-LM Model to Include an ‘Environmental Equilibrium’ Curve. Australian Economic Papers 42 (1), 118-134.
Lee, Y., Gordon, R.H., 2005. Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 89, 1027-1043.
Leitao, A., 2010. Corruption and the environmental Kuznets Curve: Empirical evidence for sulfur. Ecological Economics 69, 2191-2201.
Levin, A., Lin, C-F., James Chu, C-S., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (1), 1-24.
Lopez, R., Galinato, G.I, Islam, F., 2011. Fiscal spending and the environment: Theory and empirics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 62, 180-198.
Lopez, R.E., Palacios, A., 2010. Have Government Spending and Energy Tax Policies Contributed to make Europe Enviornmentally Cleaner?. Working Papers 94795. University of Maryland, Maryland.
Maddison, A., GDP and Population Online Data, 2010. http://www.ggdc.net/MADDISON/oriindex.htm
Mankiw, G.N., Romer, D., Weil, D.N., 1992. A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2), 407-437.
Martin C.W., Plumber, T., 2003. Democracy, government spending, and economic growth: A political-economic explanation of the Barro-effect. Public Choice 117, 27-50.
Martinez-Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A., 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Economic Letters 82, 121-126.
Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20, 597-625.
Perman, R., Stern, D.I., The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Implications of Non-stationarity. Working Paper in Ecological Economics no. 9901, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R., 1997. Pooled estimation of long-run relationships in dynamic heterogeneous panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics no. 9721, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., Smith, R., 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. ESE Discussion Papers 16, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
Pesaran, M.H., Smith, R., 1995. Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 68 (1), 621-634.
Polity IV Project, 2010. Polity IV Data Series. http://www.systemicpeace. org/polity/polity4.htm
Shafik, N., 1994. Economic Development and Environmental Quality: An Econometric Analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 46, 757-773.
Sim, N.C.S., 2006. Environmental Keynesian Macroeconomics: Some further discussion. Ecological Economics 59, 401-405.
Stern, D.I, 2005. Global sulfur emissions from 1850 to 2000. Chemosphere 58, 163-175.
Stern, D.I, Common, M.S., 2001. Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for sulfur. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162-178.
Welsch, H., 2004. Corruption, growth and the environment: a cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Economics 9, 663-693.