Grimes, Paul W. and Millea, Meghan J. and Campbell, Randall C. (2009): The transition to market-based economic education: evaluating program effectiveness in Kazakhstan. Published in: Perspectives on Economic Education Research , Vol. Volume, (2009): pp. 33-59.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_39982.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article presents an analysis of a program designed to enhance economic literacy through teacher training in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan. The cognitive and affective outcomes for high school students who were taught by teachers trained through the National Council on Economic Education's (NCEE) International Economic Education Exchange Program (IEEEP) are examined and compared to those of students in courses taught by a sample of teachers who had not received training. like most publicly supported programs, beneficiaries were not randomly chosen and assigned to treatment and control groups. To overcome the inherent sample selection which allowed for the interdependency of economic understanding and attitudes. The results indicate that students taught by trained teachers achieved higher post course scores on standardized testing instruments, after controlling for differences in student attributes, teacher characteristics, and the non-random selection of teachers into the training program. However, both the cognitive and affective improvements would have been greater even if teachers had been randomly assigned to the program. The authors call for additional research to evaluate the criteria and methods used to recruit and select teachers for participation in training programs such as the IEEEP.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The transition to market-based economic education: evaluating program effectiveness in Kazakhstan |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic education; transitional economy; Kazakhstan; evaluation; teachers; students; learning; cognition; attitudes |
Subjects: | P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P36 - Consumer Economics ; Health ; Education and Training ; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A29 - Other A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A21 - Pre-college |
Item ID: | 39982 |
Depositing User: | Paul W. Grimes |
Date Deposited: | 10 Jul 2012 09:45 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 12:01 |
References: | Alston, Richard M., James R. Kearl, and Michael B. Vaughn. 1992. Is there a consensus among economists in the 1990s? American Economic Review 82(2): 203-209. Becker, William, William Greene, and Sherwin Rosen. 1990. Research on high school economic education. American Economic Review 80(2): 14-22. Boeva, Irena and Shironin Viacheslav. 1992. Russian between state and market: The generations compared. Studies in Public Policy (#205). Glasgow, Scotland: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde. Chizmar, John and Thomas Zak. 1983. Modeling multiple outputs in educational production functions. American Economic Review 73(2): 18-22. Education Development Center. 2001. Student Testing Project 2001: Kazakhstan. New York: Education Development Center, Incorporated. Edwards, Mike. 2002. Rich future - Kazakhstan. National Geographic 201(2): 114-115. Elder, Patricia K. and Erika Sumilo. 1998. The National Council on Economic Education and its role in economic education in the transition economies. Social Studies 89(6): 251-253. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Grimes, Paul W. 1995. Economic education for at-risk students: An evaluation of Choices & Changes. The American Economist 39(1): 71-83. Grimes, Paul W., Timothy L. Krehbiel, Joyce E. Nielson, and James F. Niss. 1989. The effectiveness of Economics U$A on learning and attitudes. Journal of Economic Education 20(2): 139-152. Grimes, Paul W. and Meghan J. Millea. 2001. An Outcomes Evaluation of the International Economic Education Exchange Program in Kazakhstan. New York: National Council on Economic Education. Heckman, James J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153-162. Hill, R. Carter, Lee Adkins, and Keith Bender. 2003. Test statistics and critical values in selectivity models. In, T.B. Fomby and R.C. Hill eds., Advances in Econometrics, Volume 17: Maximum Estimation of Misspecified Models: Twenty Years Later. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Hodgin, Robert F. 1984. Information theory and attitude formation in economic education. Journal of Economic Education 15(3): 191-196. Judge, G.G., R.C. Hill, W.E. Griffiths, H. Lütkepohl, and T. Lee. 1988. Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Murphy, Kevin M. and Robert H. Topel. 1985. Estimation and inference in two-step econometric models. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3(4): 370-379. Peterson, Norris A. 1992. The high school economics course and its impact on economic knowledge. Journal of Economic Education 27(1): 5-16. Pleskovic, Boris, Anders Aslund, William Bader, and Robert Campbell. 2000. State of the art in economics education and research in transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies 42(2): 65-99. Ransom, Michael R. 1987. The labor supply of married men: a switching regression model. Journal of Labor Economics 5(1): 63-75. Shiller, Robert J., Maxim Boycko, and Vladimir Korobov. 1991. Popular attitudes toward free markets: The Soviet Union and The United States compared. American Economic Review, 81(3): 385-400. Spiro, Jody. 1998. Sustained Effects of the International Economic Education Exchange Program in Kyrgyzstan: A Longitudinal Study. New York: Education Development Center, Incorporated. Stuart, Robert C. 2000. Introduction: Teaching modern economics in transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies, 42(2): 1-4. Walstad, William B. 1987a. Measurement instruments. In, W. E. Becker, and W.B. Walstad, eds., Econometric Modeling in Eeconomic Education Research. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. Walstad, William B. 1987b. Applying two-stage least squares. In, W. E. Becker and W.B. Walstad, eds., Econometric Modeling in Economic Education Research. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. Walstad, William B. 1997. The Effects of the International Economic Education Exchange Program on Student Economic Understanding and Market Attitudes: A Research Report. Lincoln: National Center for Research in Economic Education. Walstad, William B. and Ken Rebeck. 1999. Test of Eeconomic Literacy, Third Edition. New York. National Council on Economic Education. Walstad, William B. and Ken Rebeck. 2001. Teacher and student economic understanding in transition economies. Journal of Economic Education 32(1): 58-67. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/39982 |