Nagy, Sándor (2012): The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fight against the consequences of financial and economic crisis: A theoretical approach. Published in: Crisis Aftermath: Economic policy changes in the EU and its Member States, Conference Proceedings, Szeged, University of Szeged , Vol. ISBN 9, (2012): pp. 270-282.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_40356.pdf Download (639kB) | Preview |
Abstract
There is a significant pressure on Supreme Audit Institutions in Europe: shrinking available resources and growing expectations from its stakeholders (citizens, civil organizations, investors, governments etc.). In consequence of the financial and economic crisis and the unpredictable shocks, imbalances there is a relevant need for good governance and effective spending of public money. The Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) – as independent external auditor of the budget – is intended to reach appropriate level of audit impact by using its inputs. This impact may result lower governmental expenditures, effectiver public finance management, increasing trust, transparency and accountability. Responding to the constantly changing circumstances the SAI should use and activate non-conventional resources such as knowledge and social capital to be more adaptive, effective and to achieve its strategic goals.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The role of Supreme Audit Institutions in fight against the consequences of financial and economic crisis: A theoretical approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | financial and economic crisis; cooperation; Supreme Audit Institutions; ECA; INTOSAI |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H8 - Miscellaneous Issues > H83 - Public Administration ; Public Sector Accounting and Audits D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory |
Item ID: | 40356 |
Depositing User: | Beata Farkas |
Date Deposited: | 06 Aug 2012 14:24 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 06:22 |
References: | Blume, L. – Voigt, S. (2010): Does organizational design of supreme audit institutions matter? A cross-country assessment. European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 2, pp. 215-229. Caldeira, V. (2009): Az Európai Számvevőszék együttműködése a legfőbb uniós ellenőrző intézményekkel (The collaboration of the European Court of Auditors with the european national supreme audit institution). Pénzügyi Szemle), 4, pp. 503-518. Contact Committee (2007): Status outline of EU SAI Contact Committee activities. Dijkman, M. (2010): A Framework for Assessing Systemic Risk. Policy Research Working Paper 5282, World Bank. European Commission – EC (2008): A European Economic Recovery Plan. Communication from the Commission to the European Council, Commission of the European Communities, COM(2008) 800 final, November 26, 2008. European Commission – EC (2009a): Economic Crisis in Europe: Causes, Consequences and Responses. European Economy 7/2009. Directorate General – Economic and Financial Affairs. European Commission – (EC 2009b): The EU's response to support the real economy during the economic crisis: an overview of Member States' recovery measures. European Economy Occasional Papers 51, July 2009. Directorate General – Economic and Financial Affairs. European Union (2008): Consolidated version of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 9, 5, 2008 C115/47. Eurostat (2011a): Foreign direct investment flows still influenced by the crisis. Statistics in focus, 25. Eurostat (2011b): Tax revenue in the European Union – The economic crisis affects the relative shares of tax components. Statistics in focus, 26. IMF (2009): Fiscal Implications of the Global Economic and Financial Crisis. (A Staff Team from the Fiscal Affairs Department). IMF Staff Position Note June 9, 2009. SPN/09/13. INTOSAI (2001): Basic Principles in Government Auditing. ISSAI 100, INTOSAI. INTOSAI (2007): Cooperation between Supreme Audit Institutions – Tips and Examples for Cooperative Audits. INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing. INTOSAI (2009a): INTOSAI Task Force Global Financial Crisis – Challenges for SAIs. Terms of Reference. June 29. INTOSAI (2009b): The Auditing Function of Supreme Audit Institutions - A systematic mapping of the auditing assignments of 31 selected Supreme Audit Institutions across the regions of INTOSAI. INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee. INTOSAI (2010a): INTOSAI Global Financial Crisis Task Force – Challenges to SAIs. September 14 - 16, 2010 Meeting London, United Kingdom. INTOSAI (2010b): Impact of Financial Crises on Public Debt & INTOSAI Initiatives. INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt. INTOSAI (2010c): Strategic Plan 2011-2016. INTOSAI. Jackson, J. K. (2009): The Financial Crisis: Impact on and Response by the European Union. Congressional Research Service. Kovács Á. (2010): Közpénzügyek (Public Finances). ELTE Eötvös Kiadó Kft., Budapest. Larsson, M. N. (2011): Fiscal policy and financial crises – what are the actual effects of fiscal policy? Norges Bank Economic Bulletin, Vol. 82. 24-38 National Audit Office of Finland (2011): INTOSAI Task Force Global Financial Crisis – Challenges for SAIs. Report of Subgroup 2a: Actions to Minimize and Avert the Crisis; What Is Working and What Is Not. Riksrevisionen (2010): The Causes of the Global Financial Crisis and their Implications for Supreme Audit Institutions. Swedish National Audit Office, Stockholm. World Bank (2001): Features and functions of supreme audit institutions. Prem notes – Public Sector, 59. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/40356 |