López, Alberto (2012): Productivity effects of ICTs and organizational change: A test of the complementarity hypothesis in Spain.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_40400.pdf Download (600kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using firm level data, this paper explores the effect of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and organizational change on firms' productivity. In line with the most relevant empirical literature, it focuses on the complementarity between these two practices. It is argued that there are significant productivity gains associated with new organizational practices in combination with investments in ICTs. I find evidence supporting the hypothesis that the use of ICTs is complementary with organizational change, although this result depends on which ICTs variable is used. Finally, results are consistent when analyzing manufacturing and services firms separately.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Productivity effects of ICTs and organizational change: A test of the complementarity hypothesis in Spain |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ICTs; Organizational Change; Complementary |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity |
Item ID: | 40400 |
Depositing User: | Alberto López |
Date Deposited: | 31 Jul 2012 19:51 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 16:30 |
References: | Arellano, M., Bond, S., 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297. Arellano, M., Bover, O., 1995. Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics 68, 29-51. Astebro, T., 2002. Non-capital investment costs and the adoption of CAD and CNC in US metalworking industries. RAND Journal of Economics 33(4), 672-688. Athey, S., Stern, S., 1998. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER Working Paper No 6600, Cambridge, MA. Baker, G., Hubbard, T., 2004. Contractibility and asset ownership: on board computers and governance in US trucking. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(4), 1443-1479. Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., 2007. How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement, and worker skills. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(4), 1721-1758. Battisti, G., Stoneman, P., 2005. The intra-firm diffusion of new process technologies. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, 1-22. Black, S.E., Lynch, L.M., 2004. What's driving the new economy: The benefits of workplace innovation. Economic Journal 114, 97-116. Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J., 2010. Recent advances in the empirics of organizational economics. Annual Review of Economics 2, 105-137. Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J., 2012. Americans do I.T. better: U.S. multinationals and the productivity miracle. American Economic Review 102(1), 167-201. Blundell, R., Bond, S., 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87, 115-143. Bresnahan, T.F., Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M., 2002. Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: Firm level evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 339-376. Brynjolfsson, E., Fitoussi, D., Hitt, L.M., 2006. The information technology iceberg. Working paper, MIT. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M., 2000. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(4), 23-48. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L.M., 2003. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4), 793-808. Brynjolfsson, E., Saunders, A., 2010. Wired for innovation: How information technology is reshaping the economy. The MIT Press. Brynjolfsson, E., Yang, S., 1996. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. In Advances in Computers, volume 43, ed. M. Zelkowitz. Academic. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 52(1), 68-82. Crespi, G., Criscuolo, C., Haskel, J., 2007. Information technology, organisational change and productivity growth: Evidence from UK firms. CEP Discussion Paper No 783. Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K., 2003. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys 35(1), 1-28. Fariñas, J.C., López, A., 2011. Medición de las innovaciones organizativas y efectos sobre la productividad: evidencias sobre la empresa española. Papeles de Economía Española 127, 120-139. Gormley, J., Bluestein, W., Gatoff, J., Chun, H., 1998. The runaway costs of packaged applications. Forrester Report 3(5), 1-15. Hall, B.H., Cummins, C., Laderman, E.S., Mondy, J., 1988. The R&D master file documentation. National Bureau of Economic Research, Technical Working Paper No. 72, Cambridge, MA. Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K., 2003. Beyond incentive pay: Insiders' estimates of the value of complementary human resource management practices. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(1), 155-78. Klette, T.J., 1999. Market power, scale economies and productivity: estimates from a panel of establishment data. Journal of Industrial Economics 48, 451-476. Leiponen, A., 2005. Skills and innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 23, 303-323. Lynch, L.M., 2007. The adoption and diffusion of organizational innovation: Evidence for the U.S. economy. NBER Working Paper No 13156, Cambridge, MA. Mairesse, J., Mohnen, P., 2010. Using Innovations Surveys for Econometric Analysis. In: Bronwyn H.H., Rosenberg, N. (Eds), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, vol. 2. Elsevier B.V., 2010. p. 1129-1155. Milgrom, P., Roberts, J., 1990. The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. American Economic Review 80 (3), 511-528. Mohnen, P., Röller, L.-H., 2005. Complementarities in innovation policy. European Economic Review 49 (5), 1431-1450. Mora-Sanguinetti, J.S., Fuentes, A., 2012. An analysis of productivity performance in Spain before and during the crisis, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 973. OECD, 2005. Oslo Manual (third edition): Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris. O'Mahony, M., van Ark, B. eds., 2003. EU productivity and competitiveness: An industry perspective. Can Europe resume the catching-up process?, European Commission. Ornaghi, C., 2006. Spillovers in product and process innovation: Evidence from manufacturing firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24, 349-380. Sapir, A., Aghion, P., Bertola, G., Hellwing, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Rosati, D., Viñals, J., Wallace., H., 2003. An agenda for a growing Europe: Making the EU economic system deliver, Report of an Independent High-Level Study group established on the initiative of the President of the European Commission. Topkis, D.M., 1978. Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Operations Research 26, 305-321. Vives, X., 1990. Nash equilibrium with strategic complementarities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 19, 305--321. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/40400 |