Tian, Guoqiang and Yang, Liyan (2005): How are Income and Non-Income Factors Different in Promoting Happiness? An Answer to the Easterlin Paradox.
Download (313kB) | Preview
This paper develops a formal economic theory to explain the Easterlin paradox-average happiness levels do not necessarily increase as countries grow wealthier. The theory analyzes the different roles of income and non-income factors in promoting people's happiness, and provides a foundation for studying happiness from the perspectives of social welfare maximization and individuals' self-interested rationality. It is shown that, for a certain class of economies, whether Easterlin paradox appears depends on the level of non-income factors. Happiness rises with income only up to a critical point that is determined by the level of the non-income factors; but once the critical income level is achieved, raising income further will lead to Pareto ineffcient allocations and decrease people's happiness. One policy implication is that government should promote a balanced growth between income and non-income factors. The empirical analysis provides some preliminary evidence consistent with the theory's predictions.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||How are Income and Non-Income Factors Different in Promoting Happiness? An Answer to the Easterlin Paradox|
|Keywords:||Easterlin Paradox, Happiness, Social Comparison, Pareto Optimality|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities
D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis
H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
|Depositing User:||Guoqiang Tian|
|Date Deposited:||12. Sep 2012 12:50|
|Last Modified:||17. Feb 2013 20:42|
 Anscombe, F., and R. Aumann, "A Definition of Subjective Probability," Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34:1 (1963), 199-205.
 Campbell, J.Y. and J.N. Cochrane, "By Force of Habit: A Consumption-Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Behavior," Journal of Political Economy 107 (1999), 205-51.
 Cooper, B., C. Garcia-Penalosa and P. Funk, "Status Effects and Negative Utility Growth," The Economic Journal, 111 July (2001), 642-665.
 Di Tella, R. and R. MacCulloch, "Gross National Happiness as an Answer to the Easterlin Paradox?" Mimeo, Harvard Business School, 2005.
 Di Tella, R. and R.J. MacCulloch, "Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20:1 (2006), 25-46.
 Diener, E. and M. Seligman, "Beyond Money: Toward an Economy of Well-Being," Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5:1 (2004), 1-31.
 Easterlin, R., "Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?" Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27 (1995), 35-47.
 Easterlin, R., "Income and Happiness: Toward a Unified Theory," Economic Journal, 111:473 (2001), 465-84.
 Easterlin, R., "Explaining Happiness," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100:19 (2003), 11176-83.
 Frank, R.H., "The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods," American Economic Review 75:1 (1985), 101-116.
 Frank, R.H., "How Not to Buy Happiness," Daedalus 133:2 (2004), 69-79.
 Frederick, S. and G. Loewenstein, "Hedonic Adaptation," In: D. Kahneman, Ed Diener and N. Schwarz (eds.),Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, (1999) 302-329 .
 Frey, B., and A. Stutzer, Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-Being, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.
 Graham, C., "The Economics of Happiness," Forthcoming In: S. Durlauf and L. Blume (eds.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition, 2005.
 Helliwelll, J.F., "How's Life? Combing Individual and National Variables to Explain Subjective Well- Being," Economic Modelling 20 (2003), 331-360.
 Layard, R., Happiness: Lessons from a New Science, London: Allen Lane, 2005.
 Liu, W.F. and S.J. Turnovsky, "Consumption Externalities, Production Externalities, and the Accu- mulation of Capital," Journal of Public Economics 89 (2005), 1097-1129.
 Ng, Y-K, "From Preference to Happiness: Towards a More CompleteWelfare Economics," Social Choice and Welfare, 20 (2003), 307-350.
 Ng, Y-K and J. Wang, "Relative Income, Aspiration, Environmental Quality, Individual and Political Myopia: Why May the Rat-Race for Material Growth be Welfare-Reducing?" Mathematical Social Sciences, 26 (1993), 3-23.
 Ng, S. and Y-K Ng, "Welfare-Reducing Growth despite Individual and Government Opitimization," Social Choice and Welfare, 18 (2001), 497-506.
 Schyns, P., 2003, Income and Life Satisfaction: A Cross-national and Longitudinal Study, Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
 Solnick, S.J. and D. Hemenway, "Are Positional Concerns Stronger in Some Domains than in Others?" American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, May 2005, Vol 95 No 2: 147-151.
 Stevenson, B. and Justin Wolfers, 2008, "Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox" (http://bpp.wharton.upenn.edu/jwolfers/Papers/EasterlinParadox.pdf).
 Tian, G. and L. Yang, "A Formal Economic Theory for Happiness Studies: A Solution to the Happiness- Income Puzzle," Mimeo, Texas A&M University, 2005.
 Tian, G. and L. Yang, "Theory of Negative Consumption Externalities with Applications to Economics of Happiness," forthcoming in Economic Theory, 2008.
 A. Vostroknutov, "Preferences over Consumption and Status," Mimeo, University of Minnesota, 2007.