El impacto del BDH en el gasto de bienes no deseados: Un análisis de regresión discontinua

Nabernegg, Markus (2012): El impacto del BDH en el gasto de bienes no deseados: Un análisis de regresión discontinua.

Abstract

Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programs are gaining more and more weight in Latin America's public policy. Although there exists a wide range of literature about the impact of these programs on school matriculation, the reduction in child labour and the improvements in the health status of recipients, there exist no extensive works on the possible bad use of the benefits. This paper investigates the impact of the Ecuadorian Bono de Desarrollo Humano (BDH) program on household expenditures for cigarettes, alcohol and cell phones. With data from the Condiciones de Vida questionnaire of the year 2006 I built a quasi-experiment thanks to the assignment rule of the BDH (which is the Selben index) and use a regression discontinuity method to estimate the impact of the program on these undesirable goods. The results show that there is no impoact of the BDH on the expenditure for the three goods (measured in expenditure per capita and in the proportion of total expenditure) for households located at the limit between the second and third quintile, and therefore, presumably, also not for poorer households. This confirms the good design of the assignment rule of the program.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The impact of the Bono de Desarrollo Humano in the expenditure for undesirable goods: A regression discontinuity analysis
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: Conditional Cash Transfers; Latin America; Regression Discontinuity
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C31 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions ; Social Interaction Models

References

Angrist, J., Pischke, J., 2009. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.

Attanasio, O., Lechene, V., 2002. Tests of income pooling in household decisions. Review of economic dynamics 5 (4), 720–748.

Fernald, L., Hidrobo, M., 2011. Ecuador’s cash transfer program (bono de desarrollo humano) and child development in infants and toddlers: A randomized effectiveness trial. Social Science & Medicine.

Lee, D., Lemieux, T., 2009. Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Nber Working Paper Series 14723.

León, M., Younger, S., 2007. Transfer payments, mothers’ income and child health in ecuador. The Journal of Development Studies 43 (6), 1126–1143.

Maluccio, J. A., Flores, R., 2004. Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: The nicaraguan red de protección social. FCND Discussion paper No. 184.

Oosterbeek, H., Ponce, J., Schady, N., 2008. The impact of cash transfers on school enrollment: Evidence from ecuador. Policy Research Working Paper 4645, The World Bank Development Research Group.

Paxson, C., Schady, N., 2007. Does money matter? the effects of cash transfers on child health and development in rural ecuador. Policy Research Working Paper 4226.

Ponce, J., 2008. Educational Policy and Performance: Evaluating the impact of targeted education programs in Ecuador. Maastricht: Shaker Pub.

Ponce, J., Bedi, A., 2010. The impact of a cash transfer program on cognitive achievement: The ’bono de desarrollo humano’ of ecuador. Economics of Education Review 29 (1), 116–125.

Rubalcava, L., Teruel, G., Thomas, D., 2004. Spending, saving and public transfers paid to women. California Center for Population Research On-Line Working Paper Series CCPR-024-04.

Schady, N., Araujo, M., 2006. Cash transfers, conditions, school enrollment, and child work: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ecuador. Vol. 3930. World Bank Publications.

Schultz, T. P., 2004. School subsidies for the poor: evaluating the mexican progresa poverty program. Journal of Development Economics 74 (1), 199–250.

Skoufias, E., McClafferty, B., 2001. Is progresa working? summary of the results of an evaluation by ifpri. Fcnd Discussion Paper No. 118.