DING, HONG (2012): Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_41327.pdf Download (328kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study econometrically test the impacts on economic growth of public social expenditure and its four major components: income support, pension benefits, public health and other social services. I use a two-way fixed effect model for panel data of all OECD nations, which includes most of the determinants of growth in previous growth empirical studies for either cross section or panel data as control variables and check possible endogeneity of the variables of interest: welfare measures by Durbin-Wu-Hausman test. The empirical analysis shows a robust negative correlation between welfare spending rate, pension spending rate and GDP growth. The policy implication of this study is: Despite possible positive impact from some sub-components of government welfare expenditures on social services other than public health, overall the total government public social expenditure has a negative effect on economic growth. The source of this impact is pension spending rate, which has a self-reinforcing effect. The self-reinforced rising pension spending rate slows down economic growth (through inhibiting investment rate and productivity growth), which in the end will make the financing of welfare expenditure unsustainable. To prevent such a crisis, introducing more working-age immigrants, particularly skillful immigrants is a feasible way to deter population ageing, slowing down of economy and eruption of sovereign debt crisis in the long run.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | welfare state; economic growth; endogeneity; Durbin-wu-hausman test; pension; ageing population |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H53 - Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity |
Item ID: | 41327 |
Depositing User: | Hong Ding |
Date Deposited: | 15 Sep 2012 21:05 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 05:37 |
References: | Adema, W., P. Fron and M. Ladaique (2011), “Is the European Welfare State Really More Expensive?: Indicators on Social Spending, 1980-2012; and a Manual to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX)”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 124. Angrist, Joshua D. and Krueger, Alan B (2001), Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 15, Number 4, Fall 200, Pages 69–85 Atkinson, A. B. (1995). Incomes and the Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-55796-8. Barro, Robert J. (1990), Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98 (October), pp 103-25 Barro, Robert J.; McCleary, Rachel M. (2003), Religion and Economic Growth, NBER Working Paper 9682, http://www.nber.org/papers/w9682, May 2003 Barro and Sala-i-Martin (2004), Economic Growth 2nd edition, The MIT Press Beraldo, Sergio; Montolio, Daniel; Turati Gilberto (2009), Healthy, educated and wealthy: A primer on the impact of public and private welfare expenditures on economic growth, Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (2009) 946-956 Blanchard, Olivier and Stanley Fischer (1989), Lectures on Macroeconomics (Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press) Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance 2001, 20: 249-272. Davidson, R. and J. G. MacKinnon (1993), Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press. Ding, Hong (2011), Does Welfare State Affect People’s Incentive to Work or Study? An Empirical Study on Youth Inactivity Rate, in review Disney, Richard (2000), The impact of tax and welfare policies on employment and unemployment in OECD countries, IMF working paper, WP00/164 Grier, K., Tullock, G. (1989), An Empirical Analysis of Cross-national Economic Growth, 1951-80, Journal of Monetary Economics, pp. 259-276 Headey, Bruce; Goodin, Robert E. ; Muffels, Ruud and Dirven, Henk-Jan (2000), Is There a Trade-Off Between Economic Efficiency and a Generous Welfare State? A Comparison of Best Cases of `The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, Social Indicators Research, Volume 50, Number 2, 115-157, 2000 Heckman, James J. (1976), A life-cycle model of earnings, learning and consumption, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84 (August), pp.11-44 King, Robert G., and Sergio Rebelo (1990), Public policy and economic growth: Developing neoclassical implications, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98 (October), pp. 126-50 Lindert, Peter H (2003), “Why the Welfare State Looks Like a Free Lunch”, NBER Working Paper No. 9869, Issued in July 2003 Maddala, G. S., and Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and New Simple Test, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 631-652 Nordstrom, Hakan (1992), “Studies in Trade Policy and Economic Growth” Monograph No. 20, Stockholm: Institute for International Economic Studies, 1992 Ramsey, Frank (1928). “A Mathematical Theory of Saving.” Economic Journal, 38, December, 543–559 Stock, James H. and Motohiro Yogo (2005) “Testing for Weak Instruments in IV Regression,” in Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Donald W. K. Andrews and James H. Stock, eds. Cambridge University Press, pp.80–108. Tullio, Gisseppe (1987), “Long run implications of the increase in taxation and public debt for employment and economic growth in Europe”, European Economic Review, Vol. 31(April), pp. 741-80 Weede, Erich (1986), “Sectoral Reallocation, Distributional Coalitions and the Welfare State as Determinants of Economic Growth Rats in Industrialised Democracies” European Journal of Political Research 14 (1986): 501-19 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. (2001), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England, October 2001 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/41327 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics. (deposited 27 Jun 2012 23:19)
-
Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics. (deposited 30 Jun 2012 22:12)
-
Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics. (deposited 27 Jul 2012 13:42)
- Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics. (deposited 15 Sep 2012 21:05) [Currently Displayed]
-
Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics. (deposited 27 Jul 2012 13:42)
-
Economic growth and welfare state: a debate of econometrics. (deposited 30 Jun 2012 22:12)