Morales Meoqui, Jorge (2012): Nature and merits of Ricardo’s statement of comparative advantage.
Download (230kB) | Preview
Due to a precise definition of comparative advantage and a deeper understanding of the logical interrelationships between this proposition and the two other main elements in David Ricardo’s famous numerical example in the Principles – the classical rule of specialization and the proposition regarding the non-appliance of the labor theory of value in international exchanges –, it is possible to fully appreciate the crucial omissions and shortcomings in Robert Torrens’ competing statement in his Essay on the External Corn Trade (1815). In Torrens’ example of English cloth being traded for Polish corn, he clearly missed to apply the classical rule of specialization for Poland. For this international exchange to take place, though, there has to be gains from trade for both trading partners. More importantly, Torrens also failed to recognize the crucial role of Ricardo’s insight regarding the non-appliance of the law of value in international exchanges in proving the comparative-advantage proposition. Therefore, he is not entitled to the same amount of merit as Ricardo since he fell short of formulating a full proof of the comparative-advantage proposition prior to the publication of the Principles.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Nature and merits of Ricardo’s statement of comparative advantage|
|Keywords:||comparative advantage, David Ricardo, Robert Torrens, international trade theory, classical political economy, free trade|
|Subjects:||B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals
B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B12 - Classical (includes Adam Smith)
F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General
A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A11 - Role of Economics ; Role of Economists ; Market for Economists
|Depositing User:||Jorge Morales Meoqui|
|Date Deposited:||24. Sep 2012 22:04|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 18:53|
Aldrich, J., (2004). The Discovery of Comparative Advantage. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(3), pp. 379–399.
Chipman, J. S. (1965). A Survey of the Theory of International Trade: Part 1, The Classical Theory. Econometrica , 33 (3), pp. 477-519.
Hollander, J. H. (1911). Ricardo and Torrens. The Economic Journal , 21, pp. 455-468.
Hollander, S. (1979). The Economics of David Ricardo. London: Heinemann.
Irwin, D. A. (1998). Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
Kemp, M. C., & Okawa, M. (2006). The Torrens–Ricardo Principle of Comparative Advantage: an Extension. Review of International Economics , 14 (3), pp. 466–477.
Maneschi, A. (1998). Comparative Advantage in International Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Maneschi, A., 2004. The true meaning of David Ricardo’s four magic numbers. Journal of International Economics, 62 (2), pp.433–443.
Maneschi, A., 2008. How Would David Ricardo Have Taught the Principle of Comparative Advantage? Southern Economic Journal, 74 (4), pp.1167–1176.
Mill, J. (1826). Elements of Political Economy (3rd Edition ed.). London: Baldwin, Cradock and Joy .
Mill, J. S. (1963-1991). The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. (J. M. Robson, Ed.) London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Morales Meoqui, J. (2011). Comparative Advantage and the Labor Theory of Value. History of Political Economy , 43 (4), pp. 743-763.
Morales Meoqui, J. (2010). Reconciling Ricardo’s Comparative Advantage with Smith’s Productivity Theory. MPRA Working Paper No. 41442.
Pullen, J. (2006). Did Ricardo Really Have a Law of Comparative Advantage? A Comparison of Ricardo's Version and the Modern Version. History of Economics Review , 44, pp. 59-75.
Ricardo, D. (2004). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. (P. Sraffa, Ed.) Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.
Robbins, L. (1958). Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. London: Macmillan. Rothbard, M. L. (1995). Classical Economics. Cheltenham (U.K.): Edward Elgar.
Ruffin, R. J. (2002). David Ricardo's Discovery of Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy , 34 (4), pp. 727-748.
Ruffin, R. J. (2005). Debunking a Myth: Torrens on Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy , 37 (4), pp. 711-722.
Schonhardt-Bailey, Ch. (2006). From Corn Laws to Free Trade: Interests, Ideas, and Institutions in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Seligman, E. R. (1903, September). On Some Neglected British Economists. The Economic Journal , 13 (51), pp. 335-363.
Seligman, E. R. (1911). Ricardo and Torrens. The Economic Journal , 21, pp. 448-455.
Sraffa, P. (1930). An Alleged Correction of Ricardo. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 44 (3), pp. 539-544.
Thweatt, W. O. (1976). James Mill and the Early Development of Comparative Advantage. HOPE , 8 (2), 207-234.
Torrens, R. (2000). Collected Works of Robert Torrens (Vols. I-VIII). (G. d. Vivo, Ed.) Bristol: Thoemmes Press.
Viner, J. (1937). Studies in the Theory of International Trade. London: Allen & Unwin.
Available Versions of this Item
On the distribution of authorship-merits for the comparative-advantage proposition. (deposited 12. Jan 2012 19:03)
- Nature and merits of Ricardo’s statement of comparative advantage. (deposited 24. Sep 2012 22:04) [Currently Displayed]