The dialogue in foresight

Serbulescu, Radu (2012): The dialogue in foresight.

Abstract

Abstract

Contemporary literature on dialogue focuses particularly on Bohmian dialogue. One argument may be the ability of this dialogue theory to match with modern communication tools, especially through Internet. Also, the major theme of Bohm theory, the open dialogue, has been developed technologically as an “open space” where all dialogues, whatever aims or subject, may possible. This paper states that the dialogue processes differs in nature, and one particular process do not result from an arbitrary option. The foresight, for instance, does not consist in a dialogue related to one specific topic, whatever complex and extended might be. The dialogue, in this case, may be seen as a support action for the foresight activity, or as a resource which may offer solutions for sustaining it. This is a ‘dialogue in’ for the foresight, and the discussions may focus on various related themes: sustainability, science-society dialogue, environmental policy etc. The purpose of this dialogue is to reveal new meanings for ‘foresight’, as a second-order significant. Certainly, words like future, vision, forecast etc. may not be mentioned, but any loss in meaning: in fact, there is a third-order of signification for these words. Dialogue might be also considered as an activity itself, even in relation with foresight. This is a ‘dialogue about’ the subject, which is concerned on a denotative meaning of the word: the dialogue will emphasize the connotations of the related words like future, vision, forecast etc. and the purpose is to negotiate a common meaning for the subject-word, foresight. When a dialogue is an ongoing process, it creates stable communication structures, or dialogical groups. It is natural to consider the emergence of one group having a certain a priori purpose, even it appears accidentally. The word ‘purpose’ might refers to debate a subject, to reach an agreement or to explore the significations of one term. It is also natural to examine how adequate is the structure, and it might be expressed in two ways: how large should be the group, and how many time is necessary to reach the purposed objective. Starting and sustaining dialogical structures depends strongly on nature of the activity to be supported by the dialogue, available resources and objectives. Foresight dialogue is, in fact, a “mix of dialogues” which proves the homogeneity of the field.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Keywords: dialogue, communication, semiotics, dialogue about, dialogue in, efficient dialogue, foresight
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A12 - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines; A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics

References

References

Arnett, Ron (1986) Communication and Community: Implications of Martin Buber's Dialogue, Southern Illinois University Press

Barthes, Roland (1987) Mythologies, New York: Hill & Wang

Berlo, David K. (1960) The process of communication: an introduction to theory and practice, San Francisco, Rinehart Press

Black, Laura W. (2005) Building connection while thinking together: by-products of employee training in dialogue, in: Western Journal of Communication, 1 July

Blake, Anthony (1996) Structures of Meaning, Bridgewater, New Jersey, UNIS Institute

Bohm, David, Donald Factor and Peter Garrett, Dialogue: A Proposal, 1991

Bohm, David (1996) On Dialogue, London, Routledge

Bohm, David (1992) Thought as a System, London, Routledge

Bohm, David (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London, Routledge

Buber, Martin (1947) Between Man and Man, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul

Buber, Martin (1958) I and Thou, New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons

Claude E. Shannon (1948) A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 27, pp. 379–423, 623–656

Douglas, Mary (1973) Natural Symbols: explorations in cosmology, London, Pelikan

ForSociety ERA Net (2006) task 2.2: Enablers Science-Society Dialogue. Position Paper

Friedman, Yona (1974) The critical group size, in: International Associations 26 No. 5, p. 284 285 Gardner, Howard (1984) Frames of Mind: the theory of multiple intelligences, London, Heinemann

Haselbach, Arne (2000) Learning in Polylogues: On processes of social insertion into overlapping cultures, in: Lifelong Learning in Europe 4/2000, Helsinki, pp. 196-200

Helsley, Robert W. and Strange, William C. (2004) Knowledge barter in cities, in: Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 327-345, September

Judge, Anthony, Groupware Configurations of Challenge and Harmony, in: Transnational Associations, 1979, 10, pp 467-475

Judge, Anthony (1979) Representation, Comprehension and Communication of Sets: the Role of Number, in: International Classification, 5 (1978) No. 3, p. 126 - 133; 6 (1979) No. 1, p 15-25; 6 (1979) No. 2, p. 92-103

Judge, Anthony (1992) Varieties of Dialogue Arenas and Styles

Levi-Strauss, Claude (1955) Tristes tropiques, Paris, Plon McWhinney, Will (1991) Paths of Change: strategic choices for organizations and society, London, Sage

Mushakojim, Kinhide (1978) Scientific revolution and interparadigmatic dialogue, Tokyo, United Nations University, GPID project

Osgood, Charles E., George Suci, & Percy Tannenbaum (1957) The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana IL, University of Illinois Press

Pangaro, Paul (1993) The Conversation of Theories & A Theory of Conversations: von Foerster, Maturana, Pask, Antioch University Seattle, January

Rask, Mikko (2007), Science-Society Dialogue in Foresight. Balancing between Increasing Variety and Productive Convergence, in: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy

Sherry, Lorraine (2000) The nature and purpose of online conversations: A brief synthesis of current research, in: International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6 (1), p. 19-52

Slotte, Sebastian (2004) Dialogue and Systems Intelligence: A Work Philosophy, in: Raimo P. Hämäläinen and Esa Saarinen (eds.), Systems Intelligence – Discovering a Hidden Competence in Human Action and Organizational Life, Helsinki University of Technology: Systems Analysis Laboratory Research Reports, A88, October

Staton, Matt (2006) Monstrous foresight, Second International Seville Seminar on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis: Impact of FTA Approaches on Policy and Decision-Making – Seville 28-29 September