Crisis and methodology: some heterodox misunderstandings

Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont (2012): Crisis and methodology: some heterodox misunderstandings.

Abstract

Whether justified by the concrete circumstances or not, an economic crisis is, by simple association, taken as an implicit refutation of the invisible hand vision and the underlying theory. The fundamental heterodox critique locates the source of apparent theoretical difficulties at the level of methodology. Although acceptable in principle, this belief involves some actual misunderstandings with regard to the respective roles of deterministic laws and deductive reasoning. In order to clarify these, the present paper revisits some key episodes in the history of economic methodology.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: financial crisis; intellectual crisis; power of ideas; material consistency; logical consistency; determinism; deductive method; failure of reason; common sense; domain of economics; Cournot’s Unfitness Proposition
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B10 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925 > B20 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology

References

Backhouse, R. E., and Medema, S. G. (2009). On the Definition of Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1): 221–233.

Boland, L. A. (2003). The Foundations of Economic Method. A Popperian Perspective. London, New York, NY: Routledge, 2nd edition.

Coates, J. (2007). The Claims of Common Sense. Moore, Wittgenstein, Keynes and the Social Sciences. Cambridge, New York, NY, etc.: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, I. B. (1977). History and the Philosopher of Science. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, pages 308–349. Urbana, IL, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Cohen, I. B. (1999). The Principia; Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, chapter A Guide to Newton’s Principia, pages 11–370. Berkley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, London: University of California Press.

Davidson, P. (1984). Reviving Keynes’s Revolution. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 6(4): 561–575. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4537848.

Dow, S. C. (2005). Axioms and Babylonian Thought: A Reply. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(3): 385–391. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4538933.

Farmelo, G. (2009). The Strangest Man. The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Quantum Genius. London: Faber and Faber.

Feyerabend, P. K. (2004). Problems of Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feynman, R. P. (1992). The Character of Physical Law. London: Penguin.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1970). The Economics of Production. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 60(2): 1–9. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 1815777.

Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Hahn, F. H. (1981). Review: A Neoclassical Analysis of Macroeconomic Policy. Economic Journal, 91(364): 1036–1039. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2232512.

Hodgson, G. M. (2001). How Economics Forgot History. The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science. London, New York, NY: Routledge.

Hudík, M. (2011). Why Economics is Not a Science of Behaviour. Journal of Economic Methodology, 18(2): 147–162.

Hudson, M. (2010). The Use and Abuse of Mathematical Economics. real-world economics review, (55): 2–22. URL http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue55/ Hudson255.pdf.

Jevons, W. S. (1911). The Theory of Political Economy. London, Bombay, etc.: Macmillan, 4th edition.

Keynes, J. M. (1937). The General Theory of Employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 51(2): 209–223. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1882087.

Keynes, J. M. (1973). The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes Vol. VII. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan. (1936).

King, J. E. (2002). A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936. Cheltenham, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Kirman, A. (1997). The Evolution of Economic Theory. In A. d’Autume, and J. Cartelier (Eds.), Is Economics Becoming a Hard Science?, pages 92–107. Cheltenham, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

Klant, J. J. (1988). The Natural Order. In N. de Marchi (Ed.), The Popperian Legacy in Economics, pages 87–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Klant, J. J. (1994). The Nature of Economic Thought. Aldershot, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

Koestler, A. (1979). The Sleepwalkers. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (1959).

Laidler, D. (1999). Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. New York, NY: Routledge.

Lawson, T. (2012). Mathematical Modelling and Ideology in the Economics Academy: Competing Explanations of the Failings of the Modern Discipline? Economic Thought, 1(1): 3–22. URL http://et.worldeconomicsassociation.org/ index.

Mayer, T. (1993). Truth versus Precision in Economics. Aldershot, Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

Mill, J. S. (2004). Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, chapter On the Definition of Political Economy; and the Method of Investigation Proper to It., pages 93–125. Electronic Classic Series PA 18202: Pennsylvania State University. URL http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/jsmill/Unsettled-Questions.pdf.

Mill, J. S. (2006a). Principles of Political Economy With Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, volume 3, Books III-V of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

Mill, J. S. (2006b). A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation, volume 8 of Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

Mirowski, P. (1995). More Heat than Light. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mäki, U. (1994). Reorienting the Assumptions Issue. In R. E. Backhouse (Ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, pages 236–256. London, New York, NY: Routledge.

Moggridge, D. E. (1976). Keynes. London, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Nelson, R. H. (2006). Economics as Religion: From Samuelson to Chicago and Beyond. Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Pålsson Syll, L. (2010). What is (Wrong With) Economic Theory? realworld economics review, (55): 23–57. URL http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/ issue55Syll55.pdf.

Popper, K. R. (1960). The Poverty of Historicism. London, Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Popper, K. R. (1980). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London, Melbourne, Sydney: Hutchison, 10th edition.

Popper, K. R. (1994). The Myth of the Framework. In Defence of Science and Rationality. London, New York, NY: Routledge.

Porter, T. M. (1994). Rigor and Practicality: Rival Ideals of Quantification in Nineteenth-Century Economics. In P. Mirowski (Ed.), Natural Images in Economic Thought, pages 128–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Redman, D. A. (1997). The Rise of Political Economy as Science. Methodology and the Classical Economists. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.

Robbins, L. (1935). An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London, Bombay, Calcutta etc.: Macmillan, 2nd edition.

Rogers, C. (2010). The Principle of Effective Demand: The Key to Understanding the General Theory. In R. W. Dimand, R. A. Mundell, and A. Vercelli (Eds.), Keynes’s General Theory after Seventy Years, IEA Conference Volume No. 147, pages 136–156. Houndmills, Basingstoke, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ronan, M. (2006). Symmetry and the Monster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosenberg, A. (1994). What is the Cognitive Status of Economic Theory? In R. E. Backhouse (Ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, pages 216–235. London, New York, NY: Routledge.

Rotheim, R. J. (1981). Keynes’ Monetary Theory of Value (1933). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 3(4): 568–585. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/4537623.

Schmiechen, M. (2009). Newton’s Principia and Related ‘Principles’ Revisted, volume 1. Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 2nd edition.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1946). The Decade of the Twenties. American Economic Review, 36(2): 1–10. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818192.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1994). History of Economic Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Skidelsky, R. (2009). Keynes. The Return of the Master. London: Allen Lane.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2011). The Failure of Macroeconomics in America. China & World Economy, 19(5): 17–30.

Suppe, F. (1977). Afterword. In F. Suppe (Ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, pages 615–730. Urbana, IL, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Suppes, P. (1968). The Desirability of Formalization in Science. Journal of Philosophy, 65(20): 651–664.

Tómasson, G., and Bezemer, D. J. (2010). What is the Source of Profit and Interest? A Classical Conundrum Reconsidered. MPRA Paper, 20557: 1–34. URL http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20557/.

Viner, J. (1963). The Economist in History. American Economic Review, 53(2): pp. 1–22. URL http://www.jstor.org/stable/1823845.

Weintraub, E. R. (1985). General Equilibrium Analysis. Cambridge, London, New York, NY, etc.: Cambridge University Press.