Doran, Justin (2012): Are different forms of innovation complements or substitutes? Published in: European Journal of Innovation Management , Vol. 15, No. 3 (2012): pp. 351-371.
Preview |
PDF
JD_AreAV2012.pdf Download (491kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to provide an empirical analysis of whether differing forms of innovation act as complements or substitutes in Irish firms’ production functions. Design-Methodology/Approach – The approach adopted by this paper is empirical in nature. Data is obtained for approximately 582 firms from the Irish Community Innovation Survey 2004-06. Four forms of innovation activity are identified; new to firm product, new to market product, process and organisational innovation. Formal tests for complementarity and substitutability are applied to these types of innovation to assess whether they have a complementary effect on firms’ turnover. Findings – The results suggest that there is a substantial degree of complementarity among different forms of innovation. Out of six possible innovation combinations, three are complementary while none exhibit signs of substitutability. Social Implications – From a business perspective, the importance of organisational change to facilitate technological innovation is highlighted while from a policy perspective the importance of the incentivisation of organisation and process innovation is also highlighted. Originality/Value – To date most research has focused on the impact of various forms of innovation, in isolation, on firms’ productivity. They do not consider whether these forms of innovation may in fact be linked, and that by implementing two or more innovations simultaneously, the combined benefits may be greater than the sum of the parts.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Are different forms of innovation complements or substitutes? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Innovation, Productivity, Complementarity, Substitutability |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives |
Item ID: | 44580 |
Depositing User: | Mr Justin Doran |
Date Deposited: | 24 Feb 2013 14:31 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 19:31 |
References: | Ar, I. and B. Baki (2010). "Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation: Empirical evidence from SMEs located in Turkish science and technology parks." European Journal of Innovation Managment 14(2): 172 -206. Athey, S. and S. Stern (1998). "An Empirical Framework for Testing about Complementarity in Organisational Design." NBER Working Paper 6600(June ). Cassiman, B. and R. Veugelers (2006). "In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition." Managment Science 52(1): 68-82. Cohen, W. and S. Klepper (1996). "A reprise of size and R&D." Economic Journal106(437): 925-951. Crépon, B., E. Duguest, et al. (1998). "Research, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level." Economics of Innovation and New Technology 7(2): 115-158. Doran, J. and E. O’Leary (2011). "External Interaction, Innovation and Productivity: An Application of the Innovation Value Chain for Ireland." Spatial Economic Analysis 6(2): 199 - 222. Drucker, P. (1998). "The Discipline of Innovation." Harvard Business ReviewNovember-December: 3 - 8. Forfás (2008) "Community Innovation Survey 2004-2006 – First Findings." Freeman, C. and L. Soete (1997). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London, Pinter. Garcia, R. and R. Calantone (2002). "A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review." The Journal of Product Innovation Management 19(1): 110 - 132. Griffith, R., E. Huergo, et al. (2006). "Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries." Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(4): 483-498. Griliches, Z. (1979). "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth." Bell Journal of Economics 10(1): 92-116. Griliches, Z., Ed. (1995). R&D and Productivity: Econometric results and measurement issues. Handbook of Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford, Blackwell. Hall, B., F. Lotti, et al. (2009). " Innovation and Productivity in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from Italy." Small Business Economics 33(1): 13-33. Hansen, M. and J. Birkinshaw (2007). "The Innovation Value Chain: A Logic for Fixing Your Company’s Innovation Problems." Harvard Business Review June. Hou, J. and P. Mohnen (2011). "Complementarity between in‐house R&D and technology purchasing: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms." UNUMERIT Working Paper Series 048. Janz, N., H. Lööf, et al. (2003). "Firm Level Innovation and Productivity: Is there a Common Story Across Countries?" C.F.E.E. Research. Johansson, B. and H. Lööf (2009). " Innovation, R&D and Productivity." Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies Electronic Working Paper Series159(January). Kline, J. and N. Rosenberg, Eds. (1986). An Overview of Innovation. The Positive SumStrategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, National Academy Press. Klomp, L. and G. Van Leeuwen (2001). "Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach." International Journal of the Economics of Business 8(3): 343-364. Klomp, L. and G. Van Leeuwen (2006). "On the Contribution of Innovation to MultiFactor Productivity Growth." Economics of Innovation and New Technology15(4): 367-390. Kodde, D. and F. Palm (1986). "Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions." Econometrica 54(5): 1243 - 1248. Kraft, K. (1990). "Are Product- and Process-Innovations Independent of Each Other?" Applied Economics 22(8): 1029 - 1038. Leiponen, A. (2005). "Skills and innovation." International Journal of Industrial Organisation 23(5-6): 303-323. Lööf, H. and A. Heshmati (2002). "Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity: A firm Level Innovation Study." International Journal of Production Economics76(1): 61-85. Lööf, H. and A. Heshmati (2006). "On the Relationship between Innovation and Performance: A Sensitivity Analysis." Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15(4): 317-344. Love, J. and M. Mansury (2007). "External Linkages, R&D and Innovation Performance in US Business Services." Industry and Innovation 14(5): 477-496. Love, J. and S. Roper (2009). "Organising the Innvoation Process: Complementarities in Innovation Networking." Industry and Innovation 16(3): 273-290. Lucas, R. (1988). "On the Mechanics of Economic Development." Journal of Monetary Economics 22(1): 3 - 39. Mansury, M. and J. Love (2008). "Innovation, Productivity and Growth in US Business Services: A Firm Level Analysis." Technovation 28(1-2): 52-62. Martinez-Ros, E. (2000). "Explaining the Decisions to Carry out Product and Process Innovations: The Spanish Case." The Journal of High Technology Management Research 10(2): 223-242. Martinez-Ros, E. and Labeaga (2009). "Product and Process Innovation: Persistence and Complementarities." European Managment Review 6(1): 64 - 75. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1990). "The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization." American Economic Review 80(3): 511 - 528. Miravete, E. and J. Pernías (2006). "Innovation Complementarity and Scale of Production." The Journal of Industrial Economics 54(1): 1 - 29. Mohnen, P. and L. Roller (2005). "Complementarity in Innovation Policy." European Economic Review 49(6): 1431 - 1450. Mol, M. and J. Birkinshaw (2009). "The Sources of Managment Innovation: When Firms Introduce New Managment Practices." Journal of Business Research 62(12): 1269 - 1280. OECD (1991). The Nature of Innovation and the Evolution of the Productive system, Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy. Paris, OECD. OECD (2005). The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. France, OECD Publication. Pavitt, K. (1984). "Sectoral Patterns of Technical change: towards a taxonomy and theory." Research Policy 13(6): 343-374. Percival, J. and B. Cozzarin (2008). "Complementarities affecting the Returns to Innovation." Industry and Innovation 15(4): 371 - 392. Reichstein, T. and A. Salter (2006). "Investigating the Sources of Process Innovation among UK Manufacturing Firms." Industrial and Corporate Change 15(4): 653 -682. Romer, P. (1986). "Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth." Journal of Political Economy 94(5): 1002 - 1037. Roper, S., J. Du, et al. (2008). "Modeling the innovation value chain." Research Policy37(6-7): 961-977. Roper, S., J. Love, et al. (2006). "The Determinants of Export Performance: Evidence for Manufacturing Plants in Ireland and Northern Ireland." Scottish Journal of Political Economy 53(5): 586 - 615. Roper, S., J. Youtie, et al. (2010). "Knowledge, Capabilities and Manufacturing Innovation: A USA-Europe Comparison." Regional Studies 44(3): 253 - 279. Schmidt, T. and C. Rammer (2007). "Non-technological and Technological Innovation: Strange Bedfellows?" Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper Series 07-052. Schmiedeberg, C. (2008). "Complementarities of innovation activities: An empirical analysis of the German manufacturing sector." Research Policy 37: 1492 - 1503. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, U.S., Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. (1975). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York, Harper and Row. Sharapova, D. and P. Kattuman (2010). "Complementarities in the Adoption of Modern Management Practices and Firm Performance." Micro-Dyn Working Paper No. 01/10 (January). Strube, E. and M. Resende (2009). "Complementarity of Innovation Policies in the Brazilian Industry: An Econometric Study." CESIFO Working Paper (No. 2780). Swann, P. (2009). The Economics of Innovation: An Introduction. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar. Zinger, T. (2002). "Crafting internal hybrids: complementarities, common change initiatives and the team based organisation." International Journal of the Economics of Business 9(1): 79 - 95. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/44580 |