Consequences of price volatility in evaluating the benefits of liberalisation

Boussard, Jean-Marc (2006): Consequences of price volatility in evaluating the benefits of liberalisation.

Abstract

Many computable general equilibrium models have been set up recently, in order to assess the benefits of trade liberalisation, especially in agriculture. Although figures magnitudes differ from one model to another, they cannot reach any other conclusion than positive benefits. On the other hand, historical experience shows that liberalisation, far from being a new idea, has been tried at several occasions during the two last centuries, repeatedly ending in crisis, and hasty return to various forms of protection. A possible explanation could be in the comparative static approach of most liberalisation proponents, and their neglect of dynamic aspects. Especially, because risk is necessarily tied with unfulfilled expectations, it should play a decisive role in modelling. A new model is developed along this line, showing the possibility of a chaotic price regime, which would prevent full liberalisation to be feasible.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: University of Buenos Aires
• Language: English
• Keywords: globalisation; risk ; volatility ; modelling ; trade ; agriculture ; Doha ; WTO
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F11 - Neoclassical Models of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation

References

ACKERMANN Frank (2005) : The Shinking Gains from Trade Liberalisation : A Critical assessment of Doha Round projections . Global Development and Environment Institute, Working paper 05-01, Medford (Ma) .

ALLAIS, M. (1993) : Une imposture intellectuelle.Le Figaro, 16 novembre 1993.

ANDERSON, K. and W. MARTIN (2005) : Agricultural trade reform and the Doha development agenda Palgrave Mc Millan and World Bank, Washington.

ANDERSON, K, W. MARTIN, and D. VAN DER MENSBRUGGHE Global impact of the Doha round on poverty in : Poverty and WTO: Impact of the Doha development agenda, T. Hertel and L.A. Winter, editors, World Bank, Washington, 2005.

AYOUZ, M. BOUSSARD, J.M., F.GERARD, M.G. PIKETTY, A.K. CHRISTENSEN, and T. VOITURIEZ , Endogenous risk and long run effects of liberalisation in a global analysis framework Forthcoming, Economic Modelling BAI J., PERRON P. (1998), Estimating and Testing Linear Models With Multiple Structural Changes, Econometrica, 66, 47-78. BAI J., PERRON P. (2003), Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural Change Models, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22.

BOUET, A., J.C. BUREAU, Y. DECREUX and S. JEAN(2004) : Multilateral agricultural trade liberalisation : the contrasting fortunes of developing countries in the Doha round Mimeo, CEPII, Paris, 2004.

BOUSSARD J.M., 1996. When risk generates chaos. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 29 (96/05), 433-446.

BOUSSARD, J.M., F.GERARD, M.G. PIKETTY, A.K. CHRISTENSEN, and T. VOITURIEZ : May the pro-poor impacts of trade liberalization vanish because of imperfect information ? Agricultural Economics; 31(2): 297-305,

BOUSSARD, J.M. , F. GERARD and M.G. PIKETTY (2005) : Libéraliser l’Agriculture ? Théorie, modèles et réalité Edition Quae, Paris.

DIXON, P.B., B.R. PARMENTER, J. SUTTON et D.P. VINCENT (1980) : ORANI : A multisectorial model for the australian economy, North Holland, Amsterdam.

FEREIRA FILHO J.B and M. HORRIDGE (2005): The Doha round, poverty and inequality in Brazil . World Bank Working paper #3746.