Guardabascio, Barbara and Ventura, Marco (2013): Estimating the dose-response function through the GLM approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_45013.pdf Download (244kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper revises the estimation of the dose-response function as in Hirano and Imbens (2004) by proposing a flexible way to estimate the generalized propensity score when the treatment variable is not necessarily normally distributed. We also provide a set of programs that accomplish this task by using the GLM in the first step of the computation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Estimating the dose-response function through the GLM approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | generalized propensity score, GLM, dose-response, continuous treatment, bias removal |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection |
Item ID: | 45013 |
Depositing User: | Dr Barbara Guardabascio |
Date Deposited: | 13 Mar 2013 17:44 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:07 |
References: | Becker, S. O., and A. Ichino. 2002. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal 2: 358377. Bia M., and A. Mattei. 2008. A STATA package of the Estimation of the Dose-Response Function through Adjustment for the Generalized Propensity Score. The Stata Journal, 8(3), 354-373. De Jong P., and G. Z. Heller. 2008. Generalized Linear Models for Insurance Data. Cambridge University press. Fryges H., and J. Wagner. 2008. Export and productivity growth: first evi-dence from a continuous treatment approach. Review of World Economics, 144(4): 695-722. Fryges H. 2009. The export-growth relationship: estimating a dose-response function. Applied Economics Letters, 16(18); 1855-1859. Hausman J.A., and G.K. Leonard. 1997. Superstars in the national basket-ball association: Economic value and policy. Journal of Labor Economics 15, 586-624. Hirano K., and G.W. Imbens. 2004. The Propensity Score with Continu-ous Treatments. In Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspective, ed. A. Gelman and X.-L. Meng. Whiley, 73-84. Imai K., and D.A. Van Dick. 2004. Causal inference with general treat-ment regimes: generalizing the propensity score. Journal of The American Statistical Association, 99: 854-866. Imbens G.W. 2000. The role of propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87: 706-710. Imbens G.W., D.B. Rubin, and B. Sacerdote. 2001. Estimating the effect of unearned income on labor supply, earnings, savings and consumption: evidence from a survey of lottery players. American Economic Review, 91:778-794. Lechner M.R. 2001. Identification and estimation of causal effects of mul-tiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption, in Econo-metric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies, M. Lechner and F. Pfeiffer eds, Physica, Heidelberg. Leuven, E., and B. Sianesi. 2003. psmatch2: Stata module to per-form full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common sup-port graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Boston College Depart-ment of Economics, Statistical Software Components. Downloadable from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html. Liu J.L., J.T. Liu, J.K. Hammitt, and S.Y Chou. 1999. The price elasticity of opium in Taiwan, 1914-1942. Journal of Health Economics 18; 795-810. McCullagh P., and J.A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Second edition. New York: Chapman and Hall. Papke L.E. and J.M. Wooldridge. 1996. Econometric Methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (K) plan Participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6): 619-632. Rabe-Hesketh S. and B. Everitt. 2000. A handbook of Statistical Analyses using Stata. Second Eds, Chapman & Hall/Crc. Boca Raton London New York Washington D.C.. Rosenbaum P.R., and D.B. Rubin. 1983. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal inference. Biometrika 70: 41-55. Rosenbaum P.R., and D.B. Rubin. 1984. Reducing bias in observational studies using classification on the propensity score. Journal of The Ameri-can Statistical Association, 73, 516-24. Wagner J. 2001. A note on the firm size-export relationship. Small Business Economics 17, 229-337. Wooldridge J.M.. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/45013 |