Strategic Entry and the Relationship between Number of Independent and Non-Independent Candidates: A Study of Parliamentary Elections in India

Bhattacharya, Kaushik (2011): Strategic Entry and the Relationship between Number of Independent and Non-Independent Candidates: A Study of Parliamentary Elections in India.

Abstract

The paper attempts to examine the nature and the extent of strategic entries of independent candidates in elections following FPTP rule. The paper observes that besides individual incentives of the candidates, a major factor behind the emergence of independents under FPTP systems could be the surreptitious strategic floating of such candidates by major political parties. Accordingly, the paper proposes to use the number of non-independent candidates in a constituency as a readily observable ex ante proxy for political fragmentation and hypothesizes a strong functional relationship between non-independent and independent candidates. Empirical results for all parliamentary elections in India since 1962 reveal that during the first four elections in our reference period (e.g., during 1962—1977), the relationship was weak, as many independent candidates during this period were regional feudal satraps who either participated in elections with Congress support or posed the only challenge to Congress in their locality. However, political fragmentation and bitter fight among political parties in India during the 1980s gave birth to a new class of independents whose entries into the elections were primarily strategic in nature, leading to a strong relationship between the above two variables during this period.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Strategic Entry, Independent Candidates, Election, Prisoners‘ Dilemma, Fragmentation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

References

Abramson PR, JH Aldrich, P Paolino and DW Rohde, 1995: 'Third-Party and Independent Candidates in American Politics: Wallace, Anderson, and Perot', Political Science Quarterly, 110(3), 349 - 367.

Alvarez RM, J Nagler and S Bowler, 2000: 'Economics, and the Dynamics of Multiparty Elections: The British 1987 General Election', American Political Science Review, 94(1), 131 – 149.

Balagopal K, 2004: 'Andhra Pradesh: Beyond Media Images', Economic and Political Weekly, June 12.

Bhattacharya K, 2010: 'Emergence of Independent Candidates: A Negative Binomial Regression Model of an Indian Parliamentary Election', Heidelberg Papers in South Asian and Comparative Politics, No. 57, August.

Canon DT, 1993: 'Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections', American Journal of Political Science, 37(4), 1119-41.

Chibber PK, 1999: Democracy without Associations: Transformation of the Party System and Social Cleavages in India, Vistaar Publications, New Delhi.

Downs A, 1957: An Economic Theory of Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.

Dutta B, MO Jackson and M Le Breton, 2001: 'Strategic Candidacy and Voting Procedures', Econometrica, 69, 1013—1037.

Gerber ER and JB Lewis, 2004: 'Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation', Journal of Political Economy, 112(6), 1364-1383.

Harmel R and JD Robertson, 1985: 'Formation and Success of New Parties', International Political Science Review, 6, 501-23.

Hausman J et al, 1984: 'Econometric Models of Count Data with an Application to the Patents and R & D Relationship', Econometrica, 52, 909–938.

Heckelman JC and AJ Yates, 2008: 'Senate Elections with Independent Candidates', Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20(1), 31–46.

Holbrook TM and E Van Dunk, 1993: 'Electoral Competition in the American States', American Political Science Review, 87 (4), 955-62.

Hug S, 2000: 'Studying the Electoral Success of New Political Parties: A Methodological Note', Party Politics, 6, 187-97.

Inglehart R, 1997: Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Kothari R, 1970: Politics in India, Orient Longman.

Lem SB and CM Dowling, 2006: 'Picking Their Spots: Minor Party Candidates in Gubernatorial Elections', Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 471-480.

McKnight D, 1999: 'Constitutional Issues in Regulating Independent Candidates', Mimeo, House Research, Minnesota State Relay Service (www.house.leg.state.mn.us/hrd/hrd.htm).

Mitra SK and VB Singh, 1999: Democracy and Social Change in India: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the National Electorate, Sage Publications, New Delhi.

Moores B, 1987: 'Some Consequences of a Three-Party Split in a UK General Election', Journal of the Operational Research Society, 38(7), 569 -- 576.

Osborne MJ, 1995: 'Spatial Models of Political Competition under Plurality Rule: A Survey of Some Explanations of the Number of Candidates and the Positions They Take', Canadian Journal of Economics, 28(2), 261-301.

Pennings P and H Keman, 2003: 'The Dutch Parliamentary Elections of 2002 and 2003: The Rise and Decline of the Fortuyn Movement', Acta Politica, 38, 51-68.

Rosenstone SJ, RL Behr, and EH Lazarus, 1996: Third Parties in America, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

Stratmann T, 2005: 'Ballot Access Restrictions and Candidate Entry in Elections', European Journal of Political Economy, 21 (1), 59-71.

Weiner M, 1978: India at the Polls: The Parliamentary Elections of 1977, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington DC.A