Municipal Capitalism: from State to Mixed Ownership in Local Public Services Provision

Boggio, Margherita (2012): Municipal Capitalism: from State to Mixed Ownership in Local Public Services Provision.

Abstract

Which are the determinants of the choice of ownership structure for a firm providing local public services? What are the consequences of this choice on the performance of these firms? To answer these questions we will use a unique database providing economic and financial data on 321 Italian firms born in the 2000-2008 period. These data are merged with economic, political, financial and territorial data on the first municipality (for the number of shares owned) participating them. To perform the analysis and control for endogeneity, a two-stage multinomial selection model is employed, in order to identify the causal effects in the case of more than two treatments. The empirical evidence indicates that the municipality political orientation and budgetary conditions matter in the choice of ownership structure. Moreover, while for operating efficiency the computed Average Treatment Effects seems to indicate mixed ownership as a good solution, the ‘canonical’ performance and employment indicators provide evidence in the opposite direction.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: political economy, public finance, public and mixed firm performance, municipal capitalism.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G38 - Government Policy and Regulation; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions ; Privatization ; Contracting Out

References

Biais, B., and E. Perotti, (2002). ‘Machiavellian Privatization’. American Economic Review, 92(1):240–258.

Bianchi, P., B. Bortolotti, L. Pellizzola, and C. Scarpa, (2009). Comuni S.p.A. : il capitalismo municipale in Italia, Il Mulino.

Boardman, A., and A.R. Vining, (1989). `Ownership and Performance in Competitive Enviroments: a Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises'. Journal of Law & Economics, 32:1-33.

Boggio, M., (2010). Municipal Capitalism, Regulatory Federalism and Politics. Unpublished.

Bortolotti, B., and M. Faccio, (2008). `Government Control of Privatized Firms', Review of Financial Studies, 1:1-33.

Bortolotti, B., M. Fantini, and D. Siniscalco, (2003). ‘Privatisation around the World: Evidence from Panel Data’. Journal of Public Economics, 88:305-332.

Boubakri, N., J. Cosset, and O. Guedhami, (2005). ‘Post-Privatization Corporate Governance: the Role of Ownership Structure in Investor Protection’. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2):369-399.

Boubakri, N., J. Cosset, and O. Guedhami, (2009). ‘From State to Private Ownership: Issues from Strategic Industries’. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(2):367-379.

Bourguignon, F., M. Fournier, and M. Gurgand, (2004). `Selection Bias Corrections Based on the Multinomial Logit Model: Monte-Carlo Comparisons'. DELTA Working Papers n. 2004-20.

Branco, F., and A. Mello, (1991). ‘A Theory of Partial Sales and Underpricing in Privatization’. MIT, mimeo.

CEEP, (2010). Mapping the Public Services. Technical report.

Dubin, J. A., and D. L. McFadden, (1984). `An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and Consumption'. Econometrica, 52(2):345-62.

Eckel, C., and A. Vining, (1985). `Elements of a Theory of Mixed Enterprise'. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 32(1):82-94.

Heckman, J., (1979). `Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error'. Econometrica, 47(1):153-61.

Heckman, J., J. L. Tobias, and E. Vytlacil, (2001). `Four Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation of Social Programs', Southern Economic Journal, 68(2):210-223.

Holland, P. W., (1986). `Statistics and Causal Inference'. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396):945-960.

La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny, (1999). `The Quality of Government'. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15:222-279.

Lechner, M., (2002). `Some Practical Issues in the Evaluation of Heterogeneous Labour. Market Programmes by Matching Methods'. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 165:59-82.

Marra, A., (2006). `Mixed Public-Private Enterprises in Europe: Economic Theory and an Empirical Analysis of Italian Water Utilities,' Bruges European Economic Research Papers n.4.

McFadden, D. L., (1974). `The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand'. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4):303-328.

Palia, D., (2001). ‘The Endogeneity of Managerial Compensation in Firm Valuation:a Solution’. Review of Financial Studies 14:735-764.

Perotti, E., (1995). ‘Credible Privatization’. American Economic Review, 85(4):847-859.

Roland, G., (2000). Transition and Economics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny, (1994). ‘Politicians and Firms’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4):995-1025.

Stock, J. H., and M. Yogo, (2005). `Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression'. In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, ed. Andrews and Stock, pp. 80-108, Cambridge University Press.

Verbeek, M., (2004). A Guide to Modern Econometrics, Wiley.

Vickers, J., and G. Yarrow, (1991). ‘Economics Perspectives on Privatization’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2):111-132.