Yamaguchi, Rintaro (2012): Discounting, Distribution and Disaggregation. Forthcoming in: Scottish Journal of Political Economy
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_46322.pdf Download (210kB) | Preview |
Abstract
To consider the implication of disaggregated consumption and discounting, we study discounting in a world composed of the rich and the poor, a standard setting in the literature of cost-benefit analysis with distributional considerations. We derive several discount rates for different numeraires, which would enable us to discuss intergenerational and intragenerational equity in common terms. In the example of CES-CRRA utility, we also show that disaggregated discount rates may vary owing to several factors. One important parameter of such –inequality aversion– can be determined in unknown weighting of intergenerational and intragenerational concerns.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Discounting, Distribution and Disaggregation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Discounting; income distribution; climate change; environmental stock |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 46322 |
Depositing User: | Rintaro Yamaguchi |
Date Deposited: | 18 Apr 2013 10:58 |
Last Modified: | 02 Oct 2019 23:54 |
References: | Anthoff, D. and Tol, R.S.J. (2010). On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60, pp. 14-20. Azar, C. (1999). Weight factors in cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Environmental and Resource Economics, 13, pp. 249-268. Azar, C. and Sterner, T. (1996). Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming. Ecological Economics, 19, pp. 169- 184. Dasgupta, P. (2008). Discounting climate change. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,37, pp. 141-169. Dasgupta, P., Marglin, S. and Sen, A. (1972). Guidelines for Project Evaluation. Vienna: UNIDO. Fankhauser, S., Tol, R.S. and Pearce, D.W. (1997). The aggregation of climate change damages: a welfare theoretic approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 10, pp. 249-266. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, pp. 351-401. Gerlagh, R. and van der Zwaan, B.C.C. (2002). Long-term substitutability between environmental and man-made goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 44, pp. 329-345. Gollier, C. and Zeckhauser, R. (2005). Aggregation of heterogeneous time preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 113, pp. 878-896. Heal, G. (2005). Intertemporal welfare economics and the environment. in K.-G. M¨aler and J.R. Vincent, eds., Handbook of Environmental Economics Vol.3. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V. Heal, G. (2009). Climate economics: a meta-review and some suggestions for future research. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3, pp. 4-21. Hoel, M. and Sterner, T. (2007). Discounting and relative prices. Climatic Change, 84, pp. 265-280. Johansson-Stenman, O. (2000). On the value of life in rich and poor countries and distributional weights beyond utilitarianism. Environmental and Resource Economics, 17, pp. 299-310. Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). Distributional weights in cost-benefit analysis—Should we forget about them? Land Economics, 81, pp. 337-352. Kaplow, L. (2010). Concavity of utility, concavity of welfare, and redistribution of income. International Tax and Public Finance, 17, pp. 25-42. Kaplow, L. andWeisbach, D. (2011). Discount rates, social judgments, individuals’ risk preferences and uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42, pp. 125-143. Krautkraemer, J.A. (1985). Optimal growth, resource amenities and the preservation of natural resources. Review of Economic Studies, 52, pp. 153-170. Li, C-Z. and L¨ofgren, K.-G. (2000). Renewable resources and economic sustainability: a dynamic analysis with heterogeneous time preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40, pp. 236-250. Lomborg, B. (2008). Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming. New York: Vintage. Lopez, R. (2005). Intragenerational versus intergenerational equity, in R.D. Simpson, M.A. Toman, and R.U. Ayres, eds., Scarcity and Growth Revisited. Washington, DC: RFF Press. Nordhaus, W. (2008). A Question of Balance. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pearce, D. (2003). The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, pp. 362-384. Portney, P.R. and Weyant, J.P., eds. (1999). Discounting and Intergenerational Equity. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Schelling, T. (1995). Intergenerational discounting, Energy Policy, 23, pp. 395-401. Sterner, T. and Persson, U.M. (2008). An even sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2, pp. 61-76. Tol, R.S.J. (2005). Emission abatement versus development as strategies to reduce vulnerability to climate change: an application of FUND. Environment and Development Economics, 10, pp. 615-629. Traeger, C.P. (2011). Sustainability, limited substitutability, and nonconstant social discount rates, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 62, pp. 215-228. Weikard, H.-P. and Zhu, X. (2005). Discounting and environmental quality: when should dual rates be used?Economic Modelling, 22, pp. 868-878. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46322 |