Zeynalov, Ayaz (2013): Do Sufficient Institutions Alter the Relationship between Natural Resources And Economic Growth?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_46850.pdf Download (799kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to test whether institutional governance and its performance is a main driving force to achieve a positive relationship between natural resources and economic growth in the long run. The main objective is to ascertain what kind of institutional governance would be needed to distribute natural resource wealth in such a way so as to achieve economic stability, and what specific policies are needed to avoid the curse in resource-rich developing countries. The research makes an attempt to interpret the role of institutional governance, as reflected by the indicators, in the context of resource-rich, post-Soviet countries. The main finding is that an abundance of natural resources does not guarantee economic growth, where sustainable economic growth can be guaranteed, only if the resource-rich country has good institutional governance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Do Sufficient Institutions Alter the Relationship between Natural Resources And Economic Growth? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | economic growth, natural resources, institutional governance, post-Soviet countries |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O43 - Institutions and Growth O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q32 - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development |
Item ID: | 46850 |
Depositing User: | MSc Ayaz Zeynalov |
Date Deposited: | 09 May 2013 04:43 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 16:44 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J.A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369-1401; Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J.A. (2005), Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In: Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. by Philippe Aghion and Stephen Durlauf, Elsevier, Amsterdam; Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 158-183; Corden, W. M. & Neary, J. P. (1982). Booming Sector and De-Industrialisation in a Small Open Economy. Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 92(368), 825-488; de Ferranti, D., Perry, G., Lederman, D. & Maloney, W. (2001). From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy: Trade and Job Quality (Washington D.C.: World Bank); Devarajan, S. & Swarrop, V. (1998). The Implications of Foreign Aid Fungibility for Development Assistance. Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2022, (Washington D.C.: World Bank); Eifert, B., Gelb, A. & Borje N. (2002). The political economy of fiscal policy and economic management in oil exporting countries. Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 2899, (Washington D.C.: The World Bank); Ilmi, A. (2007). Escaping from the Resource Curse: Evidence from Botswana and the Rest of the World. IMF Staff Papers, 54(4), 663-699; Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. World Bank Economic Review 12(12), 253-287; Kronenberg, T. (2004). The Curse of Natural Resources in the Transition Economies. Economics of Transition, 12 (9), 399-426; Leite, C. & Weidmann, J. (1999). Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth. IMF Working Paper, No.99, (Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund); Mankiw, G., Romer, D. & Weil, D. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-437; Manzano, O. & Rigobon, R. (2001). Resource Curse or Debt Overhang? NBER Working Paper, No. 8390, (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research); Papyrakis, E., & Gerlagh, R. (2004). The Resource Curse Hypothesis and Its Transmission Channels. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32 (3), 181-193; Paul, C. & Anke, H. (2005). Paradigm in Distress? Primary Commodities and Civil War. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 625-633; Rahim, K. A. & Liwan, A. (2012). Oil and gas trends and implications in Malaysia. Energy Policy, Elsevier, 50(C), 262-271; Sachs, J. & Warner, A. (1995). Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth. NBER Working Paper, No. 5398, (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research); Sachs, J. & Warner, A. (1997). Sources of Slow Growth in African Economies. Journal of African Economies, 6, 335-376; Sala-i-Martin, X. & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the Natural Resource Curse: An Illustration from Nigeria. NBER Working Paper, No. 9804, (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research); Terry K.L. (2007). Oil-Led Development: Social, Political, and Economic Consequences. CDDRL Working Papers, 80, 36-54; World Bank Database. (2012). World Development Indicator. Retrieved October 26, 2012, from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/46850 |