Mago, Shakun and Samak, Anya and Sheremeta, Roman (2013): Facing Your Opponents: Social Identification and Information Feedback in Contests.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_47029.pdf Download (575kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We experimentally investigate the effect of social identification and information feedback on individual behavior in contests. In all treatments we find significant over-expenditure of effort relative to the standard theoretical predictions. Identifying subjects through photo display decreases wasteful effort. Providing information feedback about others’ effort does not affect the aggregate effort, but it decreases the heterogeneity of effort and significantly affects the dynamics of individual behavior. We develop a behavioral model which incorporates a non-monetary utility of winning and relative payoff maximization. The model explains significant over-expenditure of effort. It also suggests that decrease in ‘social distance’ between group members through photo display promotes pro-social behavior and decreases over-expenditure of effort, while improved information feedback decreases the heterogeneity of effort.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Facing Your Opponents: Social Identification and Information Feedback in Contests |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | contest, information, identification, over-expenditure, experiments |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions |
Item ID: | 47029 |
Depositing User: | Roman Sheremeta |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2013 06:23 |
Last Modified: | 21 Dec 2021 09:59 |
References: | Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211-221. Amaldoss, W., & Rapoport, A. (2009). Excessive expenditure in two-stage contests: Theory and experimental evidence. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Game Theory: Strategies, Equilibria, and Theorems. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers. Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: a glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1605-1623. Bohnet, I., & Frey, B.S. (1999a). Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89, 335-339. Bohnet, I., & Frey, B.S. (1999b). The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 43-57. Bull, C., Schotter, A., & Weigelt, K., (1987). Tournaments and piece rates: an experimental study. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1-33. Burnham, T.C. (2003). Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 50, 133-144. Cason, T.N., Sheremeta, R.M., & Zhang, J. (2012). Communication and Efficiency in Competitive Coordination Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 76, 26-43. Chowdhury, S.M., Sheremeta, R.M., & Turocy, T.L. (2012). Overdissipation and Overspreading in Rent-Seeking Experiments: Cost Structure and Prize Allocation Rules. Chapman University, Working Paper. Davis, D., & Reilly, R. (1998). Do Many Cooks Always Spoil the Stew? An Experimental Analysis of Rent Seeking and the Role of a Strategic Buyer. Public Choice, 95, 89-115. Dechenaux, E., Kovenock, D., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). A Survey of Experimental Research on Contests, All-Pay Auctions and Tournaments. Chapman University, Working Paper. Dufwenberg, M., & Gneezy, U. (2002). Information Disclosure in Auctions: An Experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48, 431-444. Eckel, C., & Wilson, R. (2006). Internet cautions: Experimental games with internet partners. Experimental Economics, 9, 53-66. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., & Katok, E. (2007). Regret in Auctions: Theory and Evidence. Economic Theory, 33, 81-101. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., & Katok, E. (2008). Regret and Feedback Information in First-Price Sealed-Bid Auctions. Management Science, 54, 808-819. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., & Katok, E. (2009). A Direct Test of Risk Aversion and Regret in First Price Sealed-Bid Auctions. Decision Analysis, 6, 75-86. Fallucchi, F., Renner, E. & Sefton, M. (2012). Information feedback and contest structure in rent-seeking games. Working Paper. Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178. Gürtler, O. & Harbring, C. (2010). Feedback in Tournaments under Commitment Problems: Experimental Evidence. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19, 771-810. Hamilton, W. D. (1970). Selfish and spiteful behavior in evolutionary model. Nature, 228, 1218-1220. Harbring, C., Irlenbusch, B., Krakel, M., & Selten, R. (2007). Sabotage in Corporate Contests – An Experimental Analysis. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 14, 367-392. Hehenkamp, B., Leininger, W., & Possajenikov, A. (2004). Evolutionary equilibrium in Tullock contests: spite and overdissipation. European Journal of Political Economy, 20, 1045-1057. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (1996). Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games. American Economic Review, 86, 653-660. Isaac, R., & Walker, J.M. (1985). Information and Conspiracy in Sealed-Bid Auctions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 6, 139-159. Kalra, A., & Shi, M. (2010). Consumer Value Maximizing Sweepstakes and Contests. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 287‐300. Kuhnen, C.M., & Tymula, A. (2012). Feedback, self-esteem and performance in organizations. Management Science, 58, 94-113. Leininger, W. (2003). On evolutionarily stable behavior in contests. Economics of Governance, 4, 177-186. Ludwig, S., & Lunser, G.K. (2012). Observing your competitor – The role of effort information in two-stage tournaments. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 166-182. Mago, S.D., Sheremeta, R.M. & Yates, A. (2013). Best-of-Three Contest Experiments: Strategic versus Psychological Momentum. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31, 287-296. Millner, E.L., & Pratt, M.D. (1989). An Experimental Investigation of Efficient Rent-Seeking. Public Choice, 62, 139-151. Potters, J.C., De Vries, C.G., & Van Winden, F. (1998). An Experimental Examination of Rational Rent Seeking. European Journal of Political Economy, 14, 783-800. Price, C.R., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Endowment Effects in Contests. Economics Letters, 111, 217-219. Price, C.R. & Sheremeta, R.M. (2012). Endowment Origin, Demographic Effects and Individual Preferences in Contests. Chapman University, Working Paper. Riechmann, T. (2007). An analysis of rent-seeking games with relative-payoff maximizers. Public Choice, 133, 147-155. Savikhin, A.S., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Visibility of Contributors and Cost of Information: An Experiment on Public Goods. Chapman University, Working Paper. Savikhin, A.S., & Sheremeta, R.M. (2013). Simultaneous Decision-Making in Competitive and Cooperative Games. Economic Inquiry, 51, 1311-1323. Sheremeta, R.M., & Zhang. J. (2010). Can Groups Solve the Problem of Over-Bidding in Contests? Social Choice and Welfare, 35, 175-197. Sheremeta, R.M. (2010a). Expenditures and Information Disclosure in Two-Stage Political Contests. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54, 771-798 Sheremeta, R.M. (2010b). Experimental Comparison of Multi-Stage and One-Stage Contests. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 731-747. Sheremeta, R.M. (2011). Contest Design: An Experimental Investigation. Economic Inquiry, 49, 573-590. Sheremeta, R.M. (2013). Overbidding and Heterogeneous Behavior in Contest Experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, forthcoming. Smither, J.W., London, M., & Reilly, R.R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33-66. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient Rent Seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, G. Tullock, (Eds.), Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 97-112. Vriend, N.J. (2000). An illustration if the essential difference between individual and social learning, and its consequences for computational analyses. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 1-19. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47029 |