Garcia Perez de Leon, Cesar (2011): Does Implicit Voting Matter? Coalitional Bargaining in EU the Legislative Process. Forthcoming in: European Union Politics , Vol. 13, No. 4 (3 October 2012): pp. 22-30.
PDF
MPRA_paper_47037.pdf Download (655kB) |
Abstract
This paper theorises how decision-makers in the EU legislative process reach consensual decisions and in which policy direction through a mechanism of “implicit voting”. I introduce spatial model coalitional bargaining using a utility function that incorporates decision-maker considerations of the policy gains they expect to obtain for an outcome and the policy concessions they will need to give to other decision-makers so as to have this outcome accepted. The model predicts the formation of a compact coalition where the differences among the distances between each decision-maker position and the coalitional position are less pronounced than in competing alternative coalitions. This coalition will be able to implement this policy position as the outcome of the legislative process. The empirical evaluation of the model with DEU for 44 proposals and 111 issues of EU legislative process shows that the compact coalition offers a good prediction of how consensus in arrived at in the EU, suggesting that implicit voting explains well how EU decisional actors make consensual decisions and the direction this consensus takes.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does Implicit Voting Matter? Coalitional Bargaining in EU the Legislative Process |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Coalitional bargaining; cooperative game-theory; legislative politics; EU |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71 - Cooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory H - Public Economics > H0 - General > H00 - General |
Item ID: | 47045 |
Depositing User: | Dr. cesar Garcia Perez de Leon |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2013 19:12 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 21:55 |
References: | Axelrod, Robert (1970) Conflict of Interest: A Theory of Divergent Goals with Application to Politics, Markham: Chicago. Bal, Leendert Jan (2004), ‘Member States Operating in the EU Council of Ministers:Inside Impressions’ in Paul Meerts and Franz Cede (eds) Negotiating European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp.127-42. Bräuninger, Thomas (2007) ‘Stability in Spatial Voting Games with Restricted Maximizing’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19 (2): 173-191. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (1994) ‘Political Forecasting. An Expected Utility Method’in Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Frans Stokman (eds) European Community Decision Making. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp.71-104. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (2004) ‘Decision making models, rigor and new puzzles’, European Union Politics 5 (1): 125-138. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and Stokman, Frans (1994) European Community Decision Making. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Crombez, Cristophe (2000) ‘Institutional Reform and Co-decision in the European Union’, Constitutional political Economy 2: 41-57. Felsenthal, Dan and Machover, Moshé (1998) The Measurement of Voting Power: Theory and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Fiorina, Morris and Plott, Charles (1978) ‘Committee Decisions under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study’, American Political Science Review 72: 575-98. Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona, Van Aken, Wim and Wallace, Hellen (2006) ‘When and Why the EU Council of Ministers Votes Explicitly’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 161-94. Golub, Jonathan (1999) ‘In the Shadow of the Vote? Decision Making in the European Community’, International Organisation 53 (4): 733-764. Golub (2007). ‘Survival Analysis and European Union Decision-Making’, European Union Politics 8 (2):155-179. Grofman, Bernard (1982) ‘A Dynamic Model of Protocoalition Formation in Ideological ‘N’ Space’, Behavioral Science 27 (1): 77-90. Junge, Dirk (2010) ‘Game Theoretic Models and the Empirical Analysis of the EU’ in Thomas König, George Tsebelis and Marc Debus, Reform Processes and Policy Change: Veto Players and Decision-Making in Modern Democracies, Springer Verlag: New York. König, Thomas and Junge, Dirk (2009) ‘Why Don’t Veto Players Use Their Power?’,European Union Politics 10 (4): 507-534. Mattila, Mikko and Lane, Jan-Erik (2001) ‘Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll-Call Analysis of Council Voting’, European Union Politics 2 (1): 31-52. Mckelvey, Richard (1976) ‘Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control’, Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472-482. Mckelvey, Richard, Odeshook, Peter and Winer, Mark (1978) ‘The Competitive Solution for N-person Games without Transferable Utility. With an Application to Committee Games’, The American Political Science Review 72 (2): 599-615. Morton, Rebecca (1999) Methods and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Naurin, Daniel and Hellen Wallace, Hellen (2008) Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments play in Brussels. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Owen, Guillermo (1995) Game Theory. 3rd ed. San Diego: Academic Press. Schneider, Gerald, Finke, Daniel and Bailer, Stefanie (2010) ‘Bargaining Power in the European Union. An Evaluation of Competing Game-theoretic Models’, Political Studies 8 (1): 85-103. Schofield, Norman (1995) ‘Coalition Politics: A Formal Model and Empirical Analysis’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (3):245-81. Schofield, Norman (2008) The Spatial Model of Politics, Abingdon: Routledge. Schofield, Norman, Grofman, Bernard and Feld, Scott (1988) ‘The Core and the Stability of Group Choice in Spatial Voting Games’, American Political Science Review 82 (1): 195-211. Selck, Torsen (2005) ‘Explaining the Absence of Inertia in European Union Legislative Decision-making’, Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (5): 1055–1070. Sened, Itai (1996) ‘Coalition Formation. Theory and Evidence’ Journal of Politics, 58 (2): 350-75. Signorino, Curtis (1999) ‘Strategic Interaction and Statistical Analysis of International Conflict’, American Political Science Review 93(2): 279-297. . Thomson, Robert, Stokman, Frans, Achen, Christopher and König, Thomas (2006) The European Union Decides. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tsebelis, George (1994) ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter’, American Political Science Review 88(1): 128-142. Tsebelis, George (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Tsebelis, George and Garrett, Geoffrey (2001) ‘The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranatioanlism’, International Organization 55: 357-90. Van Den Bos, Jan (1991) Dutch EC Policy Making: A Model-guided Approach to Coordination and Negotiation. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/47045 |