Assessing the Viability of a Rural Microfinance Network : The Case of FONGS FINRURAL

AGAÏ, Oniankitan Gregoire (2012): Assessing the Viability of a Rural Microfinance Network : The Case of FONGS FINRURAL.

Abstract

This paper endeavours to assess the viability of the FONGS FINRURAL, a nascent network of 09 rural savings and credit cooperatives in Senegal. More specifically it strives to measure first how the social and financial performance and the governance vary among the network affiliated organizations, and second to what extent all this aspects in each MFI could affect the viability of the network. For cause of data availability, the research was carried on 7 out of the 9 affiliated MFIs. The methodology has consisted first in the exploitation of financial reports, financial statements, business plans, manual of procedures, minutes, reports and any kind of internal documents seeming useful and second in visits at basic affiliated associations and client information. Four data collection tools were used: the factsheet of financial assessment devised by BRS and ADA, the ECHOS© tool of social performance assessment of Incofin, version 2012, the aggregated index of governance grid, and specific interview grids to each MFIs based on their financial and social performance recorded and on their governance score as well. Financial data were collected over four years (2008-2011), while social and governance data were a snapshot of the MFIs as of may-august 2012. Different descriptive statistics were used for comparisons. The coefficient of correlation rho of Spearman was used to make links between financial performance, social performance and governance. It comes out from the peer group analysis that the membership of the entire seven MFIs, dominated by women (50%), is growing over years with an average of 23% sharply higher than that of the country (8.7%). This trend presents however some specificities pertaining to each MFI. In the same vein, the network records an increase in savings collection which is however concentrated within 02 MFIs (29%) which contributed for 54% of the total deposit of the entire network in 2011. If for the first MFI (CREC of Méckhé), the situation is due to the involvement of its groups membership, the second (MEC of v Tattaguine) owes its records to its savings policy mainly based on high rate of compulsory savings (33%) as requirement for loan application. Regarding the credit delivery, it appears that except ordinary loans, most of the loan products catered for are seasonal or working capital loans and investment loans (more than one year) with bullet repayment albeit variability in the loans maturity. To provide such credit products, MFIs rely on three main sources: the deposits, the borrowings and their equity. Most of the MFIs provide their loans from the member’s deposits and tend to report improvement of their leverage except the MEC of Dakar and that of Malicounda. Overall, all the MFIs loan portfolios are growing with an average growth rate of 17% except the CREC of Méckhé which faced a decrease in its portfolio of about 47% over the four years. However this MFI still records the highest gross portfolio amount compared to the others. Nevertheless, the growth in portfolio is facing also a growth in portfolio at risk 180 days for all the seven surveyed MFIs meaning some weaknesses in the loan portfolio management. In contrast to the PAR, some improvements are reported in operating expenses ratios which were roughly fewer than 20% except at the MEC of Dakar which mostly recorded OER over 40% in 2011 and at the MEC of Malicounda with about 90% in 2009. As consequence, the OSS of the entire 07 MFIs was appreciable between 2008 and 2010 (127%-148%) but dropped down to 88% in 2011 due to high operating expenses at the MECs of Tattaguine and Pékesse. The results also reveals that albeit claiming to be social oriented MFIs, the entire MFIs lack adequate tools, information and indicators to track and to prove that they are putting into practice their social mission, which often was not clearly stated. Based on the ECHOS© scale, it appears that the MFIs recorded low social performance in general (55%) but seemed to get better score in access and outreach and customers services, while social mission, human resources and social responsibility are lessened. vi Regarding the governance, the score reveals some acceptable governance (62%) however with some differences between institutions. The results of linkages between financial performance, social performance and governance reveals no trade-off between financial and social performance, rather it reveals significant synergies between governance and social perform, and between OSS and human resources. All these results prove that rural microfinance institutions, rather rural microfinance network can be viable. It is just a matter of more governance, more discipline in procedure and more reportage of required information.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: microfinance, savings, credit, financial performance, social perfomance, governance, Portfolio at Risk, Operational selfsufficiency
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions ; Financial Instruments ; Institutional Investors; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y4 - Dissertations (unclassified)

References

AFD (2008) - AFD and Microfinance 1988 – 2008: A twenty-year milestone. AFD, Paris, France, 6p.

Angora, W.; Bédécarrats, F. and Lapenu, C. (2009) Social and Financial Performance: The relationship between social and financial performance in microfinance

Armendariz, B. (2011) Women and Microsavings in The Handbook of Microfinance. Armendariz, B. and Labie, M. (eds). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. Singapore. pp:503-515

Azocli, R. and Adjibi, W. (2007) – Microfinance au Bénin: Evolution and Perspectives. Paper written for the African MFI Performance Evaluation Forum, 9p.

BAfD, OCDE, PNUD and CEA (2011) - Perspectives économiques en Afrique 2011 : Bénin 2011, 18p.

Barres, I.; Bruett, T.; Curran, L. ; Escalona, A.; Patapievici Nelson, E. ; Norell, D. ; Porter, B. ; Stephens, B. and Stephens, M. (2006) - Measuring Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Framework for Reporting, Analysis and Monitoring. Bruett, T. (Editor), The SEEP Network, Washington, USA, 110 p.

Bédécarrats, F.; Angora, R.W. and Lapenu, C. (2009) - Is Social Performance Profitable? The Relationship Between Social and Financial Performance in Microfinance. Feature articles? MicroBanking Bulletin, issue 19, december 2009, 8p

Bédécarrats F.; Baur, S. and Lapenu, C. (2011) - Combining social and financial performance: A paradox? 2011 Global Microcredit Summit, Commissioned Workshop Paper, November 14-17, 2011 – Valladolid, Spain. 27p.

Ben Soltane, B. (2012) Social and Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions: Is There a Trade-Off? Journal of Economics and International Finance Vol. 4(4), pp. 92–100, 22 February, 2012.

Buchenau, J. (2003) - Innovative Products and Adaptations for Rural Finance. Lead theme paper for “Paving the Way Forward for Rural Finance” An International Conference on Best Practices, 39p.

Charreaux, G. (1996) - Vers une Théorie du Gouvernement des Entreprises http://leg.u-bourgogne.fr/wp/0960501.pdf Collings, D.; Morduch, J.; Rutherford, S. & Ruthven, O. (2009) – Portfolios of the Poor: How the World’s Poor live on $2 a Day. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, 271p.

Conning, J. and Morduch, J. (2011) - Microfinance and Social Investment. The Financial Access Initiative- NYU Wagner Graduate Schoo, New-York, USA, 27p.

Dewez, D. and Neisa, S. (2009) – MFI’s Social Performance Mapping and the Relationship between Financial and Social Performance: Evidences against the Trade-off Theory. Incofin Investment Management, 12p.

Diao, O. (2006) - Viabilité financière des Institutions de Microfinance (IMF) au Sénégal : Le Cas des Réseaux. Mémoire du Diplôme d’Etudes Approfondies (DEA). PTCI, Université Cheik Anta Diop de Dakar, 63p.

Fall, A. (2012) - Les mutations juridiques et institutionnelles de la microfinance au Sénégal in Expériences de Microfinance au Sénégal. Doligez, F.; Fall, F.S and Oualy M. (eds). Editions Karthala, Paris, France, pp: 27-44.

Gonzalez, A. (2010) - Microfinance Synergies and Trade-offs-Social versus Financial Performance Outcomes in 2008. MIX Data Brief No. 7, 15p.

Goujon, A. (2009) - Community Managed Microfinance: The mysteries of intermediation between irrational economic agents, Voices of Microfinance, International Development Law Organization (IDLO), 9p.

GTZ (2002) - La viabilité Sociale d’une IMF, Atelier de Formation et de Réflexion Ouagadougou – Burkina Faso, décembre 2001.

Hartarska, V. (2005) - Governance and Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States, World Development Vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 1627–1643, 2005.

Hermes,N.; Lensink, R. and Meesters, A. (2011) - Outreach and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions, World Development, Volume 39, N°6, 938-948.

Hudon, M. (2007) - Use of Donor Funds in the Financing of MFI; CEB Working Paper N° 07/020, 24p.

IFAD (2006) - Assessing and managing social performance in microfinance. IFAD, Rome, Italy, 97p.

Labie, M. and Périlleux, A. (2008) - Corporate Governance in Microfinance: Credit Unions. CEB, Working Paper N° 08/003, 2008.

Lafourcade, A-L.; Isern, J.; Mwangi, P and Brown, M. (2005) - Overview of the Outreach and Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Africa. Mix, 20p.

Lapenu, C. and Pierret, D. (2006) - Handbook for the Analysis of the Governance of Microfinance Institutions. IFAD-GTZ-IRAM-CERISE, 90p.

Lapenu, C. ; Zeller, M.; Grelley, M. ; Chao-Béroff, R. and Verhagen, K. (2004) –Performances sociales : Une raison d'être des institutions de microfinance et pourtant encore peu mesurées, Quelques pistes, Mondes en Développement, 2004/2 no 126, pp. 51-68.

MEF/DRSSFD (2010) - Données Consolidées des Systèmes Financiers Décentralisés. République du Sénégal, 36p.

Mersland, R. (2009) – Corporate Governance and Ownership in Microfinance Organizations. Ph.d. dissertation submitted to The Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Agder, Norway, 154p.

Mersland, R. and Eggen, Ø (2007) – You cannot save alone: Financial and Social Mobilisation in Savings and Credit Groups. Study Report. Norad Report 8/2008 Discussion. Oslo, Norway, 74p

Mersland, R. and Strøm, Ø. (2009)- Performance and governance in microfinance institutions, Journal of Banking and Finance 33 (2009) 662-669.

Mersland, R.; Randøy, T. and Strøm, R. Ø. (2010) - The impact of international influence on microbanks’ performance: A global survey, International Business Review 20 (2011) 163–176.

Ndiaye, A. (2012) - Le Fonds d’appui aux initiatives rurales de la FONGS : une innovation pour financer l’investissement de l’agriculture familiale au Sénégal. Atelier d’écriture sur la microfinance au Sénégal, PAMIF1-CRES-CTB, 15p

Pearce, D.; Goodland, A. and Mulder A. (2004) - Microfinance Institutions Moving into Financing for Agriculture. Information note on microfinance and rural finance. CGAP No. 2, January 2004, 4p.

Périlleux, A. (2010) - Maturity Mismatch and Governance of Microfinance Cooperatives: Lessons from History. Centre Emile Bernheim Working Paper N° 10/005, 28p.

Périlleux, A. (2011) - Governance and Growth of Cooperatives in Microfinance. Thèse de doctorat en sciences économiques et de Gestion. Faculté Warocqué d’Economie et de Gestion, Université de Mons, Belgique. 160p.

Pistelli, M.; Simanowitz, A. and Thiel, V. (2011) - State of Practice in Social Performance Reporting and Management: A survey of 405 MFIs reporting to MIX in 2009-2010. Microbanking Bulletin, Imp-Act Consortium & Microfinance Information Exchange, Washington, DC, USA, 35p

Rosenberg (2009) Measuring Results of Microfinance Institutions: Minimum Indicators That Donors and Investors Should Track. A Technical Guide, CGAP, Washington, USA, 27p

Rutherford, S. (2011) - Boosting the Poor’s Capacity to Save: A Note on Instalment Plans and their Variants in Armendáriz, B. and Labie, M. (eds): The Handbook of Microfinance. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, Singapore, pp 517-535

Sos-Faim (2007)- Vers une Structuration du Secteur de la Microfinance au Sénégal : Dynamique de Mise en Réseau- L’Expérience de la FONGS. Zoom Microfinance N°22, Juillet 2007,10p.

von Stauffenberg, D.; Jansson, T.; Kenyon, N. and Barluenga-Badiola, M-C. (2003) – Performance indicators for Microfinance Institutions: Technical guide. MicroRate and Inter-American Developmemnt Bank, 3rd Edition, 51p.

Kumar P, V.V. (2011) - Analysis of Performance Indicators on Sustenance of Micro Finance Institutes: A Comparative Study of East Asian & Pacific, and South Asian Countries, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Volume 2, No 3, 2011, pp 1-15.

Wele (2009) – La qualité de la gouvernance microfinancière dans les pays de l’UEMOA, Université d’Economie d’Orléans, 9p.

Zerai, B. and Rani, L. (2012) - Is There a Tradeoff between Outreach and Sustainability of Micro finance institutions: Evidence from Indian Microfinance Institutions, European Journal of Business and Management, Vol 4, N°2, pp 90-94.