A ANÁLISE DE SINES COMO ATIVO GEOESTRATÉGICO NACIONAL: UM CLUSTER SUPORTADO NAS REDES MARÍTIMAS MUNDIAIS

Moreira, Paulo Pires (2012): A ANÁLISE DE SINES COMO ATIVO GEOESTRATÉGICO NACIONAL: UM CLUSTER SUPORTADO NAS REDES MARÍTIMAS MUNDIAIS. Published in: Biblioteca ISCTE No. http://catalogo.biblioteca.iscte-iul.pt/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=80081 (2013)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The current competition in port activity is not just a competition between ports but in terms of logistics networks to which they belong. If the geographic scope of competition corresponds to its competitive hinterland, the corresponding phase, the port regionalization of the hinterland, will be dependent upon the efficiency and reliability of the flow of goods transported, which requires investment in rail links, the earthly element, without neglecting the development of its foreland, the maritime element. This premise directs the analysis of Sines, throughout this paper, in a systemic perspective based on its validity as a triple sea-land interface port, a logistics platform and an area of industrial activity enabling to form as a regional cluster. Only this holistic analysis can hope to describe an in-depth, forward-looking, of one that emerges as a major strategic asset for Portugal. The enlargement of the Panama Canal is referred to as a great growth opportunity for Sines, the regional and the national economy. But to what extent this is true and how Sines, derived from its position, could become a really great port of the Atlantic coast of Europe? But above all, and most importantly, will be to pave the way to make Sines as a reference port in the market world, a challenge that is also an opportunity and that the country cannot lose. The port performance, measured in terms of efficiency and effectiveness, emerges as central to achieve this goal, not only in microeconomic terms, but also because the good or bad port performance, ultimately, influence the good or bad performance of an economy.

RESUMO A competição atual em termos portuários não se resume apenas a uma competição entre os portos mas sim em termos de redes logísticas aos quais pertencem. Se o espaço geográfico da competição corresponde ao hinterland competitivo, a fase correspondente, a de regionalização portuária do hinterland, passa obrigatoriamente pela eficiência e fiabilidade dos fluxos de mercadorias transportados, o que obriga ao investimento nas ligações ferroviárias, o elemento terrestre, sem descurar o desenvolvimento do seu foreland, o elemento marítimo. Esta premissa orienta a análise de Sines ao longo deste trabalho, numa perspetiva sistémica assente na sua tripla valência como interface marítimo-terrestre, plataforma logística e zona de atração de atividade industrial que permita constituir-se em cluster regional. Apenas analisado nesta perspetiva holística se pode aspirar a descrever uma análise profunda, direcionada para o futuro, daquele que surge como um dos grandes ativos estratégicos para Portugal. O alargamento do Canal do Panamá é referido como uma grande oportunidade de crescimento para Sines, da economia regional e da economia nacional. Mas até que ponto isso será verdade e como é que Sines, derivado do seu posicionamento, se poderá tornar efetivamente num grande porto da fachada atlântica da Europa? Acima de tudo, e talvez mais importante, será preparar o caminho para fazer de Sines uma referência no mercado portuário mundial, um desafio que é também uma oportunidade e que o país não pode perder. O desempenho, medido em termos de eficiência e de eficácia, surge como fulcral para lograr tal objetivo, não apenas em termos microeconómicos, mas também porque o bom ou mau desempenho portuário influencia, em última instância, o bom ou mau desempenho de uma economia.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: The Analysis of Sines as a Geostrategic Asset: A Cluster Supported in the Maritime Chain
• Language: Portuguese
• Keywords: Palavras-chave: Sines; cadeia marítima; desempenho portuário, cluster marítimo. Keywords: Sines; maritime chain; port performance, maritime clusters.
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O52 - Europe; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics > R42 - Government and Private Investment Analysis ; Road Maintenance ; Transportation Planning

References

Aronietis, R. et al. (2010), Some Effects of Hinterland Infrastructure Pricing on Port Competitiveness: case of Antwerp, 12th WCTR, July 11-15, 2010 – Lisbon, Portugal. Associação dos Portos de Portugal, http://portosdeportugal.pt/. Beckett, Jeannie, (2007), The Agile Port Efficient Marine Terminal, AAPA Port Operations, Safety and IT Seminar, April 25, 2007. Brooks, M.R. e Pallis, A.A. (2008), Assessing port governance models: Process and performance components. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(4), pp. 411-432. Brooks, M.R, Schellinck, T. e Pallis, A.A. (2011), A systematic approach for evaluating port effectiveness. Maritime Policy and Management, vol. 38, n.º 3, pp. 315-334. Commercial Deployment of Transportation Technologies, http://aapa.files.cms- plus.com/SeminarPresentations/07_OPSAFIT_Beckett_Jeanne.pdf. Caldeirinha, V. (2010), A Influência dos Factores Caracterizadores dos Portos no Desempenho, Tese de Mestrado, MBA-ISEG/UTL. Caldeirinha, V. (2011), Gestão Portuária II. Cargo Edições. Caschili, S. e Medda, F. (2011), Shipping as a Complex Adaptive System: A new Approach in Understanding International Trade, http://www.stt.aegean.gr/econship2011/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_vi ew&gid=53&tmpl=component&format=raw&Itemid=20. Comissão Europeia, (2011), MEMO/11/706, Brussels, October 19. Commission Staff Working Document. “The New Trans-European Transport Network Policy Planning and implementation issues”. Bruxelas, 19.01.2011 SEC (2011). Conteinerisation Internacional, http://www.ci-online.co.uk/. Coto-Millán, P. et al. (2011), Determinants of demand for international maritime transport: An application to Spain. Macmillan Publishers Ltd., Maritime Economics & Logistics Vol. 13, 3, 237–249. www.palgrave-journals.com/mel/. CTS, Container Trades Statistics, http://www.containerstatistics.com/. Cullinane, K. e Wang, Y. (2012), The hierarchical configuration of the container portindustry: an application of multiple linkage analysis, Maritime Policy & Management. De Langen, P., Nijdam, M. e Van der Horst, M. (2007), New indicators to measure port performance, Journal of Maritime Research, Vol. IV, n.º 1, pp. 23-36, 2007. ISSN: 1697-4840. Drewry Shipping Consultants, www.drewry.co.uk. Ducruet, C., e Notteboom, T. (2010), The Worldwide Maritime Network of Container Shipping: Spacial Structure and Regional Dynamics, GaWC Research Bulletin, 364. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/rb/rb364.html. Ducruet, C. e Notteboom, T. (2012), The worldwide maritime network of container shipping: spatial structure and regional dynamics, Global Networks, doi:10.1111/j.1471- 0374.2011.00355.x, http: //www.porteconomics.eu. Ducruet, C., Koster, H. e Van der Beek, D. (2010), Commodity variety and port performance, Regional Studies, Vol. 44.9, pp. 1221–1240, November 2010, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00343400903167904.pdf. European Sea Ports Organization, http://www.espo.be/. Eurostat, Illustrated Glossary for Transport Statistics, 4th edition, (2009), ISBN 978-92-79- 17082-9. Goss, R. (1990), Economic policies and seaports: The Economic Functions of Seaports. Maritime Policy and Management 17, N° 3. Instituto Portuário e dos Transportes Marítimos, http:// www.imarpor.pt/. Kaluza, P. et al. (2010), The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J. R. Soc. Interface 7(48), 1093-1103. Kleinsteuber, S. (2002), The Jade-Weser Port, An Economic Impact Assessment, PhD Thesis, European Business School. Lopes, A. S. (2001), Desenvolvimento Regional. 5.ª Edição, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian. MDS Transmodal, http://www.mdst.co.uk/. Meersman, H. (2009), Future challenges for the port and shipping sector: a research agenda. University of Antwerp. www.let.fr/fr/actualites/18- 19.03/slides%20meersman.pdf. Meersman H., Van de Voorde, E. e Vanelslander T. (2002), Port Pricing Issues: Considerations on Economic Principles, Competition and Wishful Thinking. University of Antwerp (UFSIA-RUCA and ITMMA). Papers. Brussels, 14th/15th May. Merk, O. et al. (2011), The Competitiveness of Global Port-Cities: the Case of the Seine Axis (Le Havre, Rouen, Paris, Caen) - France, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2011/07, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg58xppgc0n-en. Milan, G. S. et al. (2010), Simpósio de Excelência em Gestão e Tecnologia. A proposição de um modelo conceitual em torno da prática da governança em clusters portuários, http://www.aedb.br/seget/artigos10/419_GC_Ports_Seget.pdf. Ministério da Economia e do Emprego, Plano Estratégico de Transportes (PET) - Mobilidade Sustentável, Horizonte 2011/2015. Minju, B., et al. (2011), Container transshipment and port competition, http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/ecs/events/pe2011/Bae.pdf. NEA et al. (2010), Ports and their connections within the TEN-T – Final Report, Vigie Fiche 394-1, B1. TREN/R1/350-2008 Lot 2. Newton, S. (2008), WORLDNET: applying transport modeling techniques to long distance freight flows, European Transport Conference. Paper. Ng, K. (2006), Assessing the Attractiveness of Ports in the North European Container Transhipment Market: An Agenda for Future Research in Port Competition. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 8(3), 234-250. Ng, K. e Pallis, A.A. (2010), Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: Generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environment and Planning A, vol. 42, n.º9, pp 2147-2167. Notteboom, T. (2006), Container throughput dynamics in the East Asian container port system, Journal of International Logistics and Trade 4(1), pp. 31-52. Notteboom, T. (2012a), Global economic and trade trends: game changer for ports?. http://www.porteconomics.eu/downloads-section/cat_view/22-invited- presentations.html?orderby=dmdate_published. Notteboom, T. (2012b), Towards a new intermediate hub region in container shipping? Relay and interlining via the Cape route vs. the Suez route. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 164-178. Notteboom, T., e Rodrigue, J-P. (2005), Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy and Management, 32(3), 297–313. Notteboom, T. e Rodrigue, J-P. (2006), Challenges in the Maritime-Land Interface: Maritime Freight and Logistics, http://people.hofstra.edu/jeanpaul_rodrigue/downloads/TN_JPR_KRIHS_Paper%201. pdf. Notteboom, T. e Rodrigue, J-P. (2009), Challenges to and challengers of the Suez Canal, http://people.hofstra.edu/jean-paul_rodrigue/downloads/PT51-11_2.pdf. Notteboom, T. e Rodrigue, J-P. (2011a), The Panama Canal expansion: business as usual or game-changer?, http://www.porttechnology.org/technical_papers/the_panama_canal_expansion_busine ss_as_usual_or_game_changer. Notteboom, T. e Rodrigue, J-P. (2011b), The next box wave - can containerization reinvent itself?, Presentation at the TOC Conference, June 2011, Antwerp, Belgium. Notteboom, T. e Winkelmans, W. (2001), Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?, Maritime Policy and Management 28(1), pp. 71–89. Pallis, A e Brooks, M. (2007) Linking port performance and post-devolution port governance models, Paper presented at International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) 2007 Conference, Athens, July 2007. Patrício, M. P. (1991), A Estratégia Política e Económica do Estado Português num pólo de crescimento; O Projeto industrial de Sines, (repositório do IUL) in Sociologia, Problemas Práticos, n.º 10, pp 10-19. Port Technology International, http://www.porttechnology.org/. Puertos del Estado, http://www.puertos.es/. Relatório da Execução do II Plano de Fomento, 1959/1964. Presidência do Conselho, Secretariado Técnico, Edições da Imprensa Nacional. Revista Porto de Sines (vários números), APS. Ribeiro, J. F. et al. (1987), Grande indústria, banca e grupos financeiros —1953-73. Revista de Análise Social, vol. XXIII (99), 5.º, 945-1018. Rodrigue, J-P. (2006), Transportation and Globalization, in Encyclopedia of Globalization, Routledge, London. Rodrigue, J-P. (2012), Supply Chain Management, Logístics Changes and the Concept of Friction. Chapter 4. For Hall and M. Hesse (eds) (2012) Cities, Regions and Flow, London: Routledge, http://people.hofstra.edu/jeanpaul_rodrigue/downloads/Chapter%204%20Supply%20Chain%20Management_Rodrigue.pdf. Rodrigue, J-P. e Notteboom, T. (2006), Challenges in the Maritime-Land Interface: Port Hinterlands and Regionalization, http://people.hofstra.edu/jeanpaul_rodrigue/downloads/TN_JPR_KRIHS_Paper%202. pdf. Rodrigue, J-P. e Notteboom, T. (2010), Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands, Research in Transportation Economics. Rodrigue, J-P. e Notteboom, T. (2010a) Containerized Freight Distribution in North America and Europe, http://people.hofstra.edu/Jean-paul_Rodrigue/downloads/Regionalism%20Freight%20Rodrigue+Notteboom-v4.pdf. Rodrigue, J-P., Comtois, C. e Slack, B. (2006), The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge, New York. Rodrigue, J-P., Comtois, C. e Slack, B. (2009), The Geography of Transport Systems, Second Edition, Routledge, New York, http://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch1en/appl1en/ch1a2en.html. Rudel, R. e Taylor, J. (2000), European sea Transport and Intermodalism – Consequences for Switzerland, Project B8 of the National Research Programme (NRP) 41,http://www.transportresearch.info/Upload/Documents/200604/20060411_142330_64063_Summary_B8_NRP_41.pdf. Schade, W. et al. (2010), The iTREN-2030 Integrated Scenario until 2030. Deliverable 5 of iTREN-2030 (Integrated transport and energy baseline until 2030). Project cofounded by European Commission 6th RTD Programme. Fraunhofer-ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany. Serrano, M., M., G. e Trujillo, L. (2006), La medición de la eficiencia en el sector portuario: revisión de la evidencia empiríca. Universidad de Las Palmas de G. C. Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado. http://www.innovamar.org/descargas/sectorial/Infraestructuras%20Portuarias/Eficienci a%20del%20sector%20portuario.pdf Slack, B. (1993), Pawns in the game: ports in a global transport system, Growth and Change, 24: 579–588. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.1993.tb00138.x. TEN-T, http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/index_en.htm. The World Bank (2007), Port Reform Toolkit, Alternative Port Management Structures and Ownership Models. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6607-3. Tongzon, J. (2008) Port choice and freight forwarders, Transportation Research Part E, Elsevier, http://202.114.89.60/resource/pdf/1850.pdf. Tongzon, J. e Heng, W. (2005), Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals), Transportation Research Part A 39 (2005) 405–424, http://202.114.89.60/resource/pdf/2024.pdf. Tovar, B. e Nombela, G. (1999), Privatization and regulation of the seaport industry, http://www.wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1999/1 0/07/00009 4946_99092311540210/additional/104504322_20041117155008.pdf Tovar, B., Trujillo, L. e Jara-Díaz, S. (2004), Organization and regulation of the port industry: Europe and Spain, http://www.cec.uchile.cl/~dicidet/sjara/OrganizationAndRegulation.pdf. Van de Voorde, E. e Vanelslander, T. (2009), Market Power and Vertical and Horizontal Integration in the Maritime Shipping and Port Industry, Discussion Paper No. 2009-2, January 2009, OECD, Joint Transport Research Centre. Van Diepen, Arjen (2011), Msc Thesis Presentation, http://www.tmleuven.be/methode/goederenmodel/20111024_WCM_vanDiepen.pdf. Verhoeven, P. (2009), A Review of Port Authority Functions: Towards a Renaissance?, IAME-Final 18/05/09 (Paper 2-34), http://www.bpoports.com/assets/files/2- 34%20paper.pdf. Verhoeven, P. (2011), European Port Governance - Report of an enquiry into the current governance of european seaports. http://portosdeportugal.pt/UserFiles/espofactfindingreport2010.pdf. Vieira, M., e Vieira, E. (2003), Geoestratégia dos Espaços Económicos: Transformação e Poder no Sítio Portuário-Retroportuário do Rio Grande-RS, Revista de Ciências da Administração, Volume 5, n.º 9, Janeiro/Julho de 2003. http://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/include/getdoc.php?id=98&article=44&mode=pdf. Vitsounis, T. (2009), An economic and legal analysis of the fators determining the competitiveness of ports. Port Economics, http://www.porteconomics.eu. Wilsmeier, G. e Notteboom, T. (2010), Determinants of liner shipping network configuration : a two region comparison. Proceedings of the 2009 International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference, June, Copenhagen, Denmark. Yap, W. e Notteboom, T. (2009), Unraveling dynamics in inter-container port relationships through an examination of liner service patterns, http://www.porteconomics.eu. Zondag, B. et al. (2008), A model for maritime freight flows, port competition and hinterland transport. European Transport Conference, http://www.etcproceedings.org/paper/a-model-for-maritime-freight-flows-port-competition-and-hinterland-transport.