Leverage ratios and Basel III: proposed Basel III leverage and supplementary leverage ratios

Ojo, Marianne (2013): Leverage ratios and Basel III: proposed Basel III leverage and supplementary leverage ratios.

Abstract

The Basel III Leverage Ratio, as originally agreed upon in December 2010, has recently undergone revisions and updates – both in relation to those proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision – as well as proposals introduced in the United States. Whilst recent proposals have been introduced by the Basel Committee to improve, particularly, the denominator component of the Leverage Ratio, new requirements have been introduced in the U.S to upgrade and increase these ratios, and it is those updates which relate to the Basel III Supplementary Leverage Ratio that have primarily generated a lot of interests. This is attributed not only to concerns that many subsidiaries of US Bank Holding Companies (BHCs) will find it cumbersome to meet such requirements, but also to potential or possible increases in regulatory capital arbitrage: a phenomenon which plagued the era of the original 1988 Basel Capital Accord and which also partially provided impetus for the introduction of Basel II.

This paper is aimed at providing an analysis of the recent updates which have taken place in respect of the Basel III Leverage Ratio and the Basel III Supplementary Leverage Ratio – both in respect of recent amendments introduced by the Basel Committee and proposals introduced in the United States. It will also consider the consequences – as well as the impact - which the U.S Leverage ratios could have on Basel III. There are ongoing debates in relation to revision by the Basel Committee, as well as the most recent U.S proposals to update Basel III Leverage ratios and whilst these revisions have been welcomed to a large extent, in view of the need to address Tier One capital requirements and exposure criteria, there is every likelihood, indication, as well as tendency that many global systemically important banks (GSIBS), and particularly their subsidiaries, will resort to capital arbitrage. What is likely to be the impact of the recent proposals in the U.S.?

The recent U.S proposals are certainly very encouraging and should also serve as impetus for other jurisdictions to adopt a pro-active approach – particularly where existing ratios or standards appear to be inadequate. This paper also adopts the approach of evaluating the causes and consequences of the most recent updates by the Basel Committee, as well as those revisions which have taken place in the U.S, by attempting to balance the merits of the respective legislative updates and proposals. The value of adopting leverage ratios as a supplementary regulatory tool will also be illustrated by way of reference to the impact of the recent legislative changes on risk taking activities, as well as the need to also supplement capital adequacy requirements with the Basel Leverage ratios and the Basel liquidity standards.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: global systemically important banks (G-SIBs); risk weighted assets; leverage ratios; harmonisation; accounting rules; capital arbitrage; disclosure; stress testing techniques; U.S Basel III Final Rule
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services; G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance; K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law

References

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 'Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: The Impact of the Basel Accord' Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Working Papers April 1999

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 'Consultative Paper on a New Capital Adequacy Framework' 3rdJune 1999 <http://www.bis.org/press/p990603.htm>

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 'The Internal Ratings Based Approach' Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord 2001 http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca05.pdf

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Consultative Document, Standard Approach to Credit Risk, Supporting Document to the New Basel Accord January 2001 http;//www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca04.pdf

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Principles for Sound Stress Testing Practices and Supervision May 2009 at pages 8-12 http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs155.htm

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Consultative Document Revised Basel III Leverage Ratio Framework and Disclosure Requirements June 2013 http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs251.pdf

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Discussion Paper 'The Regulatory Framework: Balancing Risk Sensitivity, Simplicity and Comparability“ July 2013 Bank for International Settlements Publications

Basel Committee for Banking Supervision, 'Global Systemically Important Banks: Assessment Methodology and the Additional Loss Absorbency Requirement' July 2013 http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs207.pdf

DB Research, 'Leverage Ratio: Pressure on Europe is Rising' http://www.dbresearch.de/servlet/reweb2.ReWEB?addmenu=false&document=PROD0000000000317297&rdShowArchivedDocus=true&rwnode=DBR_INTERNET_DE-PROD$NAVIGATION&rwobj=ReDisplay.Start.class&rwsite=DBR_INTERNET_DE-PROD

Federal Reserve, 'Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital, Enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio Standards for Certain Bank Holding Companies and their Subsidiary Insured Depository Institutions' http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/bcreg20130709a1.pdf.

Federal Reserve, Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital, Implementation of Basel III, Capital Adequacy, Transition Provisions, Prompt Corrective Action, Standardized Approach for Risk-weighted Assets, Market Discipline and Disclosure Requirements, Advanced Approaches Risk-Based Capital Rule, and Market Risk Capital Rule http://www.federalreserve.gov/bcreg20130702a.pdf

Federal Reserve, 'Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2013: Supervisory Stress Test Methodology and Results' March 2013 B O A R D O F G O V E R N O R S O F T H E F E D E R A L R E S E R V E S Y S T E M http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/bcreg/dfast_2013_results_20130314.pdf

Financial Stability Board, Update of Group of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) (Nov. 1, 2012) http://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_121031ac.pdf

Morgan JP, 'Basel III Implementation: Is the Industry Running Out of Time?' http://www.jpmorgan.com/tss/General/Basel_III_implementation_Is_the_industry_running_out_of_time_/1320504512062

Myles D, 'How U.S 5% Leverage Ratio Could Catch Foreign Banks' <http://www.iflr.com/Article/3234308/Banking/How-US-5-leverage-ratio-could-catch-foreign-banks.html

Polk D, 'Basel III Leverage Ratio: US Proposes American Add-On, Basel Committee Proposes Important Denominator Changes“ July 19 2013

Rodriguez Valladares M, 'Why Basel' Latest Leverage Ratio is Better' http://www.americanbanker.com/bankthink/why-basels-latest-leverage-ratio-is-better-1060635-1.html

Saidenberg M and Schuermann T, 'The New Basel Capital Accord and Questions for Research' (2003) Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper 2003