Yefimov, Vladimir (2004): On pragmatist institutional economics.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49016.pdf Download (363kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The movement of New Institutional Economics (NIE), born in the seventies, followed the Institutional Economics of John R. Commons by putting the notion of ‘transaction’ in the centre of its study. The seventies were a period of appearance of an absolute authority of neoclassical economics with its hypothetic-deductive (Cartesian and positivist) methodology and the NIE followed this methodology. The NIE was assimilated by many of the members of its community with ‘transaction costs economics’. In this way they have distorted totally the initial design of Commons’ institutional economics who saw the transaction as a unit of activity common to law, economics and ethics. Instead of Cartesian analytic philosophy, which is the philosophical foundation of neoclassical economic theory, he based his institutional economics on pragmatist philosophy of Charles S. Peirce and John Dewey. As Philip Mirowski has noted “these two traditions have a profound conflict over their respective images of a ‘science’, and therefore profoundly incompatible images of ‘economic man’ and ‘rationality’” (Mirowski, 1987). Commons used the pragmatism as a model of human behaviour and as a method of research. The paper discusses the pragmatist methodology and techniques from an institutional economist point of view. It is based on a personal experience of the author in application of these methodology and techniques for economic institutional investigations. This paper is an appeal to economists to adopt the pragmatist method. This method, in its modern form related to social sciences, is Qualitative Research. It is called ‘qualitative research’ because it deals with primarily qualitative data but its most important characteristic is its affiliation to the pragmatist paradigm.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On pragmatist institutional economics |
English Title: | On pragmatist institutional economics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Pragmatism, Peirce, Dewey, institutional economics, Commons, qualitative research |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B40 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 49016 |
Depositing User: | Dr Vladimir Yefimov |
Date Deposited: | 11 Aug 2013 17:13 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 16:55 |
References: | Atkinson R. (1998), The Life Story Interview, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Alston L.J., T. Eggertsson and D.C. North, eds. (1996), Empirical Studies in Institutional Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bazzoli L. (1999), L’économie politique de John R. Commons. Essai sur l’institutionnalisme en sciences sociales, Paris: L’Harmattan. Berger P. and T. Luckman (1991), The Social Construction of Reality, London: Penguin Books. Blaug M. (1985), Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Blumer H.(1969), Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Englewood cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Bush P.D. (1993), “The Methodology of Institutional Economics: A Pragmatic Instrumentalist Perspective”, in (Tool, 1993), pp. 59 – 118. Commons J.R. (1924), Legal Foundations of Capitalism, reprinted New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1995. Commons J.R. (1932) “The problem of correlating law, economics and ethics”, in Rutherdord M. and W.J. Samuels (eds) John R. Commons. Selected Essays, Volume Two. New York : Routledge, 1996, pp. 453- 473. Commons J.R. (1934a), Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy, reprinted New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1990. Commons J.R. (1934b), Myself. The Autobiography of John R. Commons, reprinted Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1964. Comte August (1975), Cours de philosophie positive, Paris : Hermann. Corei T. (1995), L’Economie Institutionnaliste, Paris: Economica. Cyert R.M. and J.G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Davis D.B., D.W. Hands and U. Maki, eds. (1998), The Handbook of Economic Methodology, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar. Davis D.D. and C.A. Holt, eds. (1993), Experimental Economics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Debzau A.T. and D.C. North (1994), “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions”, Kyklos, 47 (1), pp. 3 – 30. Denzin N.F. and Y.S. Lincoln, eds. (2000), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Denzin N.K. (2001), Interpretive Interactionism, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Dey I. (1999), Grounding Grounded Theory. Guidelines for Qualitative Research, London: Academic Press. Dewey J. (1938), Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, New York: Henry Holt and Company. Earl P.E., ed. (1988), Behavioural Economics, Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar. Ferber R. and W.Z. Hirsch (1982), Social Experimentation and Economic Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fligstein N. (2001), The Architecture of Markets. An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Society, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Friedman D. and S. Sunder (1994), Experimental Methods. A primer for Economists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Friedman M. (1953), “Methodology of Positive Economics”, in Milton Friedman, Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 3 - 43. Fullbrook E., ed. (2003), The Crisis in Economics, The post-autistic economics movement: the first 600 days, London: Routledge. Furubotn E.G. and R. Richter (1998), Institutions and Economic Theory. The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Glaser B.G. and A.L. Straus (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategy for Qualitative research, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. Gomm R., M. Hammersley and P. Foster, eds., (2000), Case Study Method : Key Issues, Key Texts, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Greenblat C.S. and R.D. Duke, eds. (1975), Gaming-Simulation. Rational, Desighn, and Applications, Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Greenwood D.J. and M. Levin (1998), Introduction to Action Research. Social Research for Social Change, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Guerrien B. (2002), “Is There Anything Worth Keeping in Standard Microeconomics”, in (Fullbrook, 2003), pp. 104 – 107. Hamel J. (1993), Case Study Methods, Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Hands D.W. (2001), Reflection without Rules. Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. Hey J.D. and G. Loomes, eds. (1993), Recent Developments in Experimental Economics, 2 vols., Aldershot (UK): Edward Elgar Hodgson, G.M. (1988), Economics and Institutions, Cambridge: Polity Press. Hodgson, G.M., W.J. Samuels and M. R. Tool, eds. (1994), The Elgar Companion to Institutional and Evolutionary Economics, in two volumes, Aldershot (UK): Edward Elgar. Hodgson, G.M. (2003), “John R. Commons and the Foundations of Institutional Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXXVII, n° 3, September, pp. 547-576. James W. (1890), Principles of psychology, New York: Holt. Joas H. (1993), Pragmatism and Social Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Joscow P.W. (2003), New Institutional Economics: A Report Card, www.isnie.org Kagel J.H. and A.L. Roth (1995), The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Kasper W. and M. E. Streit (1998), Institutional Economics, Social Order and Public Policy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1998. Kuhn T.S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Levin M. and D. Greenwood (2001), “Pragmatic Action Research and the Struggle to Transform University into Learning Communities”, in (Reason and Bradbury, 2001), pp. 103 – 113. Locke K. (2001), Grounded Theory in Management Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Martin J. (2001), Organizational Behaviour, London: Thomson Learning. Mead G.H. (1934), Mind, Self, & Society, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Ménard C., ed. (2000), Institutions, Contracts and Organizations. Perspectives from New Institutional Economics, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham. Merriam S.B. (2001), Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education, San Francisco: John Wi1ey & Sons. Mini P. (1994), “Cartesianism in Economics”, in (Hodgson, Samuels and Tool, 1994), pp. 38 - 42) Mirowski Ph. (1987), “The Philosophical Bases of Institutionalist Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XXI, n° 3, September, pp. 1001 – 1038. Morse J.M. ed., (1994), Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Morales A. , ed. (2003), Renascent Pragmatism, Aldershot: Ashgate. Mucchielli A., ed. (1996), Dictionnaire des méthodes qualitatives en sciences humaines et sociales, Paris: Armand Colin. North D.C. (1981), Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: W.W. Norton & Company. North D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. North D.C. (1998), “Institutions and Economics”, in Bechtel W. and G. Graham, eds., Companion to Cognitive Science, Blackwell Publishers: Oxford, pp. 713 - 721. North D.C. (2000), “Understanding institutions”, in Ménard (2000), pp. 7 – 10. North D.C. (2003), The Role of Institutions in Economic Development, Occasional paper No.1, New York and Geneva: Economic Commission for Europe, United Nations. Peirce C.S. (1868) “Some Consequences of Four Incapacities”, in Peirce (1992), pp. 28 – 55. Peirce C.S. (1878), “How to Make Our Ideas Clear”, In Peirce (1992), pp. 124 – 141. Peirce C.S. (1903a), “The Nature of Meaning”. in Peirce (1998), pp. 209 – 225. Peirce C.S. (1903b), “Pragmatism as a Logic of Abduction”, in Peirce (1998), pp. 226 – 241. Peirce C.S. (1905), “What Pragmatism Is”, in Peirce (1998), pp. 331 – 345. Peirce C.S. (1992), The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 1, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Peirce C.S. (1998), The Essential Peirce. Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol. 2, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Polanyi K. (1957), “The Economy as Instituted Process”, In Granovetter M. and R. Swedberg, eds., (2001), The Sociology of Economic Life, Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 31 - 50. Poupart J. et al. (1997), La recherche qualitative. Enjeux épistémologiques et méthodologiques (Qualitative Research. Epistemological and Methodological Issues), Boucherville (Quebec): Gaëtan Morin. Ramstad Y. (1986), “A Pragmatist’s Quest for Holistic Knowledge: The Scientific Methodology of John R. Commons”, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XX, n° 4, December, pp. 1067-1105. Reason P. and H. Bradbury, eds. (2001), Handbook of Action Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Roth A. E. (1988), “Laboratory experimentation in Economics: A Methodological Overview”, Economic Journal, 98 (393), December, pp.947 – 1031. Rutherford M. (1996), Institutions in Economics: The Old and the New Institutionalism (Historical Perspectives on Modern Economics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Saunders D. and N. Smally, eds. (2000), The International Simulation and Gaming Research Yearbook Volume 8. Simulation and Games for Transition and Change, London: Kogan Page Limited. Schutz A. (1967), The Phenomenology of the Social World, Northwestern University Press. Seckler D. (1975), Thorstein Veblen and the Institutionalists: A Study in the Social Philosophy of Economics, Colorado: Colorado Associated University Press, Boulder. Silverman D. (1993), Interpreting Qualitative Data. Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Silverman D.,ed.(1997), Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Simon H. (1977), New Science of Management Decision, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Smith V.L. (1982), “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science”, American Economic Review, 72 (5), December, 923 – 55 (pp.61 – 93) Smith V.L. ,ed. (1990), Experimental Economics, Aldershot (UK): Edward Elgar. Stake R.E. (1995), The Art of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Sternberg R. J. and T. Ben-Zeev (2001), Complex Cognition. The Psychology of Human Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Strauss A. L. (1987), Qualitative Research for Social Scientists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Strauss A. and J. Corbin (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Stringer E.T. (1999), Action Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Thomas W.I. and F..Znaniecki (1926), The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, 2 vols., New York: Knopf. Tool M. R. ed. (1993), Institutional Economics: Theory, Method, Policy, Boston /Dordrecht / London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1993. Usunier J.-C., Easterby-Smith M. et R. Thore (2000), Introduction à la recherche en gestion, Paris : Economica. Veblen T. (1919), The Place of Science in Modern Civilization, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, reprinted in 2002. Ward B. (1966), “Institutions and Economic Analysis”, in The Structure of Economic Science, ed. Roy Krupp, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall,, N.J., pp. 184 - 200. Weber M. (1978), Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, 2 vols., Berkeley: University of California Press; first published in 1921-1922. Wilkes A.L. (1997), Knowledge in Minds. Individual and Collective Process in Cognition, Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press. Williamson O.E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: The Free Press. Williamson O.E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press. Williamson O.E. (2000), “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead”, Journal of Economic Literature, XXXVIII (3), September, pp. 595 – 613. Yefimov V. (1970), “Dvoystvenye otsenki v usloviakh neopredelionnosti” (Shadow prices under uncertainty), Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody (Economics and Mathematical Methods) N° 3, Moscow: Nauka. Yefimov V. (1979), “On the nature of management simulation games”, Economicko-Matematicky Obzor (Review of Econometrics), vol. 15, N°.4, Prague: Academia, pp.403 -416. Yefimov V. (1981), “Gaming-simulation of the functioning of economic systems”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.2, N° 2, pp.187 - 200. Yefimov V. (1988), Imitatsionnaya igra dla systemnogo analysa upravlenia economikoy (Simulation Game for System’s Analysis of Economic Management), Moscow: Nauka. Yefimov V. (1997), “Approche institutionnelle de l'analyse de la transition” (Institutional approach for transition analysis). Revue d'études comparatives Est-Ouest. Paris : C.N.R.S., N° 2, pp.99 - 119. Yefimov V. (2001) « Structures sociales en Russie, cellules et réseaux » (Social structures in Russia : units and networks), Nouveaux Cahiers de l’IUED, Collection Enjeux, N° 12, Paris & Geneva : PUF, pp.29 - 52. Yefimov V. (2003), Economie institutionnelle des transformations agraires en Russie (Institutional Economics of Agrarian Transformations in Russia), Paris : l’Harmattan. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49016 |