Alimi, R. Santos (2013): Keynes' Absolute Income Hypothesis and Kuznets Paradox.

PDF
MPRA_paper_49310.pdf Download (440kB)  Preview 
Abstract
The study investigates how consumption expenditure is determined by income according to Keynes’ Absolute Income Hypothesis (AIH) for the case of Nigeria and thus presents a consumption function for Nigeria for the period 1970 to 2011, estimating total household consumption expenditure against total income. The AIH model was tested by ordinary least squares over the period using data obtained from the World Bank national accounts data and Ivan Kushnir’s Research Center. We described and tested two important theoretical predictions of the Keynesian AIH model; first, that the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is constant and, second, that the average propensity to consume (APC) declines as income increases. Using Nigeria economic data, we estimated parameter MPC and APC both for short run and long run time series. The results shows that MPC conform with Keynes earlier proposition that MPC is less than one, however it is not stable and the value of the autonomous consumption is negative in the long run. We found also that the APC did not vary systematically with income as conjectured by Keynes that it declines as income increases. As a result, the income elasticity of consumption does not follow Keynes prediction. The absolute income hypothesis fits well for Nigeria data in the short run. In the long run, with the elasticity of consumption of about 1 or above 1, evidently there are other important determinants of consumption other than income.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Keynes' Absolute Income Hypothesis and Kuznets Paradox 
English Title:  Keynes' Absolute Income Hypothesis and Kuznets Paradox 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Consumption function; Average Propensity to Consume; Marginal Propensity to Consume 
Subjects:  C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2  Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C22  TimeSeries Models ; Dynamic Quantile Regressions ; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models ; Diffusion Processes E  Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2  Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21  Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth 
Item ID:  49310 
Depositing User:  mr santos alimi 
Date Deposited:  26 Aug 2013 14:05 
Last Modified:  26 Sep 2019 08:25 
References:  AlvarezCuadrado, F. & Long, N V (2011). The Relative Income Hypothesis. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 35, 14891501 Ando, A. and Modigliani, F. (1963). The lifecycle hypothesis of saving: Aggregate implications and tests. American Economic Review, 53, May: 5584. Baranzini, M. (2005.). Modigliani’s lifecycle theory of savings fifty years later. BNL Quarterly Review, vol. LVIII, nos 233234, JuneSeptember, pp. 10972. Baykara, S. and Telatar, E (n.d.). The Stationarity of ConsumptionIncome Ratios with Nonlinear And Asymmetric Unit Root Tests: Evidence from Fourteen Transition Economies Blanchard, O. J., and Fischer, S. (1989). Lectures in Macroeconomics. Cambridge: MIT Press. Branson, W. H. (1989). Macroeconomic Theory and Policy, New York: Harper and Row Publishers. Bunting, D. (2001). Keynes’s Law and Its Critics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 24, p.149163. Dickey, D., and Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution Of The Estimators For Autoregressive Time Series With A Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:427–731. Duesenberry, J.S. (1948). Income  Consumption Relations and Their Implications, in Lloyd Metzler et al., Income, Employment and Public Policy, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Engle, R.F., and Granger C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica, 55,391407 FernandezCorugedo, E. (2004). Consumption Theory.Handbooks in Central Banking, No. 23, Centre for Central Banking Studies, Bank of England Fischer, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest. New York: Macmillan Granger, C. W. J. (1986). Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48/3, 213228. http://kushnirs.org/macroeconomics/household_consumption_expenditure/household_consumption_expenditure_nigeria.html Jeffrey Parker. (2010). 16 Theories of Consumption and Saving (Economics 314 Coursebook). Retrieved from www.academic.reed.edu/economics/parker/ Johansen, S. & Juselius, K., (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration – with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 52, 2:169210. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamic, 12(1): 231254. Kankaanranta, P. (2006). Consumption Over the Life Cycle: A Selected Literature Review. Aboa Centre for Economics, Discussion Paper No. 7. Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Harcourt, Brace. Kockesen, L. (n.d.). Relative Income Hypothesis. International Encyclopedia of the Social Science, 2nd Edition p. 153 Kuznets, S. (1946). National Product Since 1869 (assisted by L. Epstein and E. Zenks), New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Kwiatkowski, D. et al. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root. Journal of Economics, 54, 159178. Maddala, G. S. and Kim, I. (1998). Unit roots, cointegration, and structural change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Modigliani, F. (1986). Life Cycle, Individual Thrift, and the Wealth Of Nations. Nobel Lecture delivered in Stockholm, Sweden, December 9, 1985, The AmericanEconomic Review, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 297313. Modigliani, F. (2001). Adventures of an Economist. Texere, New York and London. Modigliani, F. and Ando, A. (1957). Tests of the Life Cycle Hypothesis of Saving: Comments and Suggestions. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Statistics, Vol. 19, pp. 99124. Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954). Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of CrossSection Data in K.K. Kurihara ed., PostKeynesian Economics, (pp. 388436), Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick. Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1980).Utility Analysis and Aggregate Consumption Functions: An Attempt at Integration in A. Abel ed., The Collected Papers ofFranco Modigliani, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Muellbauer, J. N. and Lattimore, R. (1994). The Consumption Function: A Theoretical and Empirical Overview in Pesaran, H. and Wickens, M.R. (eds) Handbook of Applied Econometrics. Nelson, C., and C. Plosser (1982). Trends And Random Walks In Macroeconomics Time Series: Some Evidence And Implications. Journal of Monetary Economics 10: 139162. Palley, T. I. (2008). Relative Permanent Income and Consumption: A Synthesis of Keynes, Duesenberry, Friedman, and Modigliani and Brumbergh. Political Economy Research Institute, UMASS, Working Paper Series, Number 170 Phillips, P.C.B., and P. Perron (1988). Testing For Unit Roots In Time Series. Biometrika 75: 335–346. Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical Theory of Saving. Economic Journal, 38, pp 543559 Thomas, J. (1989). The Early History of The Consumption Function. Oxford Economic Papers 41, p131149. Tsenkwo, J.B. (2011). Testing Nigeria's Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) Within the Period 19802004. Journal of Innovative Research in Management and Humanities, 2(1), April. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/49310 