Alimi, R. Santos (2012): The Quantity Theory of Money and Its Long Run Implications: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. Published in: European Scientific Journal , Vol. 8, No. 12 : pp. 272-288.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49598.pdf Download (306kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The Quantity Theory of Money (QTM) is one of the popular classical macroeconomic models that explain the relationship between the quantity of money in an economy and the level of prices of goods and services. This study investigates this relationship for Nigeria economy over the period of 1960 to 2009. To check the stationarity properties, we employed Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (PP) test and found all the concerned variables are stationary only in the first differenced form. Using Johansen cointegration method, the empirical findings indicate that there exists long run cointegrating relationship among the concerned variables. Then applying the Granger causality test, we found a unidirectional causal relationship running from money supply to inflation which provides evidence in support for monetarist‟s view. In addition, this study does not provide evidence in supporting the well known fisher effect for Nigeria. Causality does not strictly run from inflation to interest rates as suggested by the Fisher hypothesis, instead a reversed causality between the variables is found. We finally used Wald test to verify the restrictions imposed on money aggregates and output, and we concluded and confirmed the proposition of quantity theory of money that inflation is a monetary phenomenon.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Quantity Theory of Money and Its Long Run Implications: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria |
English Title: | The Quantity Theory of Money and Its Long Run Implications: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Quantity Theory of Money, Co-integration, Nigerian Economy. |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers |
Item ID: | 49598 |
Depositing User: | mr santos alimi |
Date Deposited: | 09 Sep 2013 16:04 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 12:06 |
References: | Amin, SB & Rahman A.F.M.Ataur (2011), „Energy-Growth Nexus in Bangladesh: An Empirical Study‟, International Review of Business Research Papers, Vol.2, No.2, pp.182-195. Anoruo, E. (2002). Stability of the Nigerian M2 Money Demand Function in the SAP Period. Economics Bulletin 14: 1-9. Apinya Wanaset (20099), The Quantity Theory of Money : Cointegration Test of Thailand, RMUTT Global Business and Economics Review, Vol.4 No.2 March. Blejer M.I, Ize A, Leone AM & Werlang S. (2000), „Inflation Targeting in Practice: Strategic and Operational Issues and Application to Emerging Economies‟, International Monetary Fund. Duck, N. (1993). Some International Evidence on the Quantity Theory of Money. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 25: 1-12. Emerson, J. (2006). The Quantity Theory of Money: Evidence from the United States. Economics Bulletin, 5: 1-6. Ferdinand Nwafor, Hudsan Nwakanma and Paul Nkansah (2007), The Quantity Theory of Money in Developing Economy : Empirical from Nigeria. African Economics Review vol.5 no.1 Spring Fisher, I. (1911). The Purchasing Power of Money: Its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest, and Crises. New and revised edition, 1922. New York: McMillan, 1922. Reprinted by Augustus M. Kelley, 1963, 1971 (1922 edition). Friedman, Milton (Ed.) (1956). Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago: University of Chicago Press The Chicago Manual of Style Friedman, M. (1956). The Quantity Theory of Money – A Restatement, Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, (Ed.) Milton Friedman, The University of Chicago Press, 3-21 Granger, C. W. J. (1986). Developments in the Study of Cointegrated Economic Variables, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48/3, 213-228. Granger, C.W.J. and Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious Regressions in Economics, Journal of Econometrics, vol. 2,no 2, 111-120. Jagdish Handa (2009), Monetary Economics, Abingdon Second edition Routledge Jalil Totonchi (2011), Macroeconomic Theories of Inflation, 2011 International Conference on Economics and Finance Research IPEDR vol.4 IACSIT Press, Singapore Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-with Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, pp.169-210. Karfakis, C. (2002). Testing the Quantity Theory of Money in Greece, Applied Economics, 34, 583-587. King, M 1999, „Challenges for Monetary Policy: New and Old, in New Challenges for Monetary Policy‟, Proceedings of the Symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. M. S. Goodfriend, "A Framework for the Analysis of Moderate Inflations", Elsevier, Elsevier, The Journal of Monetary Economics, 39(1), P 45-66, 1997. Miyao, R. (1996) “Does a Cointegrating M2 Demand Relation Really Exist in the United States?” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 28 (3), 365-380. Miyao, R. (1996). Does a Cointegrating M2 Demand Relation Really Exist in the United States? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 28: 365-80. Moazzami, B. and K. L. Gupta (1996) “The quantity theory of money and its long-run implications.” Journal of Macroeconomics 17, 667-682. Moosa, I. A. (1997) “Testing the long-run neutrality of money in a developing economy: The case of India.” Journal of Developmental Economics 53, 139-155. Gujarati DN (2003). Basic Econometrics 4th. Ed. (Tata McGraw- Hill Edition). New Delhi: Tata McGraw- Hill Publishing Company Ltd Nelson, C. and Plosser, C. (1982). Trend and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10, 130-162. Nwafor F, Nwakanma P & Thompson, F 2007, „The Quantity Theory of Money in a Developing Economy: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria‟, African Economic and Business Review, Vol.5, No.1, pp.1-9. Nwaobi, G. (2002). A Vector Error Correction and Nonnested Modeling of Money Demand Function in Nigeria. Economics Bulletin, 3: 1-8. Omanukwue, P. N. 2010, The Quantity Theory of Money: Evidence from Nigeria Central Bank of Nigeria Economic and Financial Review Volume 48/2 June Owoye, O. and Onafowora, O. A. (2007) „M2 targeting, money demand, and real GDP growth in Nigeria: Do rules apply?‟, Journal of Business and Public Affairs 1, 1-20 Özgür Aslan* Levent Korap (2007), Testing Quantity Theory of Money for the Turkish Economy, BDDK Bankac›l›k ve Finansal Piyasalar Cilt: 1, Say›: 2, 2007 Qayyum, A 2006, „Money, Inflation and Growth in Pakistan‟, The Pakistan Development Review, Vol.45, No.2, pp.203-212. Wicksell, K. (1906). Lectures on political Economy. Vol. 2, "Money." Translated by E. Classen. Lionel Robbins (Ed.), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1935, reprinted New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1978. Wicksell, K. (1958), „Ends and Means in Economics‟, in his Selected Papers on Economic Theory (ed. E. Lindahl), London: Allen and Unwin. Wicksell, K. (1989). Interest and Prices. Translated by R. F. Kahn. London: Macmillan, 1936, reprinted, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1978. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49598 |