Araujo, Ricardo and Trigg, Andrew (2013): A Neo-Kaldorian Approach to Structural Economic Dynamics.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_49758.pdf Download (503kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Although the Structural Economic Dynamic approach provides a simultaneous consideration of demand and supply sides of economic growth, it does not take into fully account the possible role played by demand in the generation of technical progress. From a neo-Kaldorian perspective, this paper seeks to establish the concepts of demand and productivity regimes in an open version of the pure labour Pasinettian model. In order to derive the demand regime, a disaggregated version of the Keynesian multiplier is derived for an open economy, while the productivity regime is built in terms of disaggregated Kaldor-Verdoorn’s laws. The upshot is a multi-sector growth model of structural change and cumulative causation, in which an open version of the Pasinettian model may be obtained as a particular case. Besides, it is highlighted that the evolution of demand patterns, while being affected by differential rates of productivity growth in different sectors of the economy, also play an important role to establish the pace of technical progress.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Neo-Kaldorian Approach to Structural Economic Dynamics |
English Title: | A Neo-Kaldorian Approach to Structural Economic Dynamics |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cumulative causation, structural change, Kaldor-Verdoorn’s law |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O19 - International Linkages to Development ; Role of International Organizations |
Item ID: | 49758 |
Depositing User: | Ricardo Araujo |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2013 09:27 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 18:14 |
References: | Araujo, R. 2013. Cumulative Causation in a Structural Economic Dynamic Approach to Economic Growth and Uneven Development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 24, 130 – 140. Araujo, R. and Lima, G. 2007. A Structural Economic Dynamic Approach to Balance of Payment Constrained Growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31(5), 755 – 774. Araujo, R. and Teixeira, J. 2004. A Pasinettian Approach to International Economic Relations: The Pure Labour Case. Review of Political Economy, 16(1), 117 – 129. Arena, R. and Porta, P. 2012. Introduction: Structural Dynamics and Contemporary Growth Theory. In: Structural Dynamics and Economic Growth. Edited by: R. Arena and P. Porta. Cambridge University Press, New York. Blecker, R. 2010. Long-run growth in open economies: export-led cumulative causation or a balance-of-payments constraint? Paper prepared for the 2nd Summer School on “Keynesian Macroeconomics and European Economic Policies”, Berlin, Germany, 2-9 August 2009. Cornwall, J. and Cornwall,W. 2002. A Demand and Supply Analysis of Productivity Growth. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 13(2), 203–229. Dixon, R. and Thirlwall, A. 1975. A model of regional growth rate differences along Kaldorian lines, Oxford Economic Papers, 27, 201 – 214. Echevarria, C. 1997. Changes in Sectoral Composition Associated with Economic Growth. International Economic Review, 38(2), 431 – 452. Gualerzi, D. 1996. Natural Dynamics, Endogenous Structural Change and the Theory of Demand: A Comment on Pasinetti. Structural Change and Economic Dynamic 7(2), 147 – 162. Gualerzi, D. 2001. Consumption and Growth: Recovery and Structural Change in the US Economy. Edward Elgar, Chelternham, UK. Gualerzi, D. 2012. Towards a Theory of the Consumption-Growth Relationship. Available at: http://notizie.unimo.it/campusfile/file/ECO_DEP/file2556.pdf. Goodwin, R. 1949. The Multiplier as Matrix. The Economic Journal, 59(236) , 537 – 555. McCombie, J. 2006. The Nature of Economic Growth and the Neoclassical Approach: More Questions than Answers? In: Growth and Economic Development: Essays in Honour of A.P. Thirlwall. Editors: P. Arestis, J. McCombie and R. Vickerman. Edward Elgar, Chelterham, UK. McCombie, J. and Thirlwall, A. 1994. Economic Growth and Balance-of-Payments Constraint. St. Martins Press. New York. McMillan, M. and Rodrik, D. 2011. Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth. NBER Working Paper No. 17143. Miyazawa, K. 1960. Foreign Trade Multiplier, Input-Output Analysis and the Consumption Function. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74(1), 53 – 64. Ngai, R. and Pissarides, C. 2007. Structural Change in a Multisector Model of Growth, American Economic Review, 97(1), 429 – 443. Ocampo, J., Rada, C. and Taylor, L. 2009. Growth and Policy in Developing Countries: A Structuralist Approach. Columbia University Press. Pasinetti, L. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth – A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of the Nations. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. Pasinetti, L. 1993. Structural Economic Dynamics – A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. Pasinetti, L. 2005. The Cambridge School of Keynesian Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 837 – 848. Roberts, M. 2002. Cumulative Causation and Unemployment. In: Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law. Editors: J. McCombie, M. Pugno, and B. Soro. Palgrave McMillan, New York. Roberts, M. and Setterfield, M. 2007. What is Endogenous Growth Theory? In P. Arestis, M. Baddeley and J. McCombie (eds.). Economic Growth: New Directions in Theory and Policy, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 14 – 31. Setterfield, M. 2010. Endogenous Growth: A Kaldorian Approach. Trinity College Deparment of Economics. Working Paper 10-01. Setterfield, M. and Cornwall, J. 2002. A neo-Kaldorian Perspective on the Rise and Decline of the Golden Age. In M. Setterfield, ed., The Economics of Demand-led Growth:Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Silva, E. and Teixeira, A. 2008. Surveying Structural Change: Seminal Contributions and A Bibliometric Account. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 19, 273–300. Solow, R. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65–94. Thirlwall, A. 1979. The Balance of Payments Constraint as An Explanation of International Growth Rates Differences, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 128, 45 – 53. Thirlwall, A. 1983. A Plain Man’s Guide to Kaldor’s Growth Law. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics V(3), 345 – 358. Trigg, A. 2006. Marxian Reproduction Schema. London: Routledge. Trigg, A. and Lee, F. 2005. Pasinetti, Keynes and the multiplier, Review of Political Economy, 17(1), 29 – 43. Uzawa, H. 1961. On a Two-Sector Model of Economic Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 29(1), 40 – 47. Young, A. 1928. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress. Economic Journal, 38 (52), 527 – 542. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/49758 |